|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Are you spending much time at dream analysis? Freud's book. Are you interested in the mechanism of dreams?<br>
| |
| Interested in how do they're related to one another, also inside the dream.<br>
| |
| Are you more interested in the content or the structure?<br>
| |
| Not really, places are just place A and place B.<br>
| |
| Do you think of working with images? Do you think of doing the reverse (such as from text -> to images)<br>
| |
| Subjective patterns, and externalize them and make something completely different<br>
| |
| interested in the mechanism of dreams, and how can that be translated into a machine<br>
| |
| structure does have a certain pattern and interested in replicating it in some way<br>
| |
| Life of Manuel Swedenborg, scientist 1800s, inventor- very rational life- at some point, his dreams started to influence his own behaviour, and his life became influenced by his dreams. He became a theologian, all of a sudden, claiming that god was talking to him, and angels, and stuff.<br>
| |
| <br>
| |
| [[File:Inception.gif]]<br><br>
| |
| martin housen? version of the helmet of angels.<br>
| |
| also William Blake - stuff<br>
| |
| If there's a moment in which you claim there's some reality in what you dream - in that moment it becomes interesting to the rest of us / and psychoanalysis retroengineers the claim to reality (an encrypted version of a part of your life you don't wish to know about<br>
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Amy says: 'waking life' movie, protagonist in lucid dream
| |
XPUB & Lens-Based wiki