Tessel thesis drafts and notes: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Graduate_Seminar_2021-2022 | https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Graduate_Seminar_2021-2022 | ||
Been working with 'Dictaphone' and talking about the work... the thesis is changing, after having worked on the project: New emphasis: benefited from discussing my own work. | |||
theis: look into minimal music = the mantric power, making a film as a mantra, repeating but changing slowly sound and images working together. Investigating minimal art -and got to-abstract expressionism. | |||
Q: howso? | |||
T: There is a field; there is room for coincidence [restraints= a series of conditions which result in an outcome.] Ambient video. | |||
Cage | |||
Brian Eno = ambient music = ambient video | |||
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNwYtllyt3Q | |||
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYCVke7TqlA | |||
David Byrne= book on music | |||
Books: | |||
Alex Ross: The Rest is Noise | |||
Fred Turner: The Democratic Surround (how since the 1940s the desire for total emersion developed) | |||
https://hub.xpub.nl/fabulousloopdeloop/index.php/The_Fabulous_Loop_de_Loop | |||
What is the new question?: research in the parameters for my work. Look at parameters that exist in music and see how they could be applicable to video; look for instances in similar methods are applied (restraints, repetition).. | |||
Plan: | |||
Chapter 1: about my work; talk about my own parameters and methods. Analise my own obsessions and interests; examine my own modes of looking (gaze); how do my methods build into a work?. | |||
Chapter 2: Diving into method by which minimal-serial music is made provides a lens for understanding my own work. Theoreis about ... | |||
Chapter 3: what conclusion can we come to? What have we learned about the horizon of possibilities? Outline framework for methods (= what I want to capture). | |||
Conclusion | |||
Outcome for next meeting | |||
Aim: | |||
1: have chapter one written; have literature for chapter two ; | |||
2: continue to make notes (record) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:58, 13 January 2022
Realistic outcome for next meeting=
https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Graduate_Seminar_2021-2022
Been working with 'Dictaphone' and talking about the work... the thesis is changing, after having worked on the project: New emphasis: benefited from discussing my own work.
theis: look into minimal music = the mantric power, making a film as a mantra, repeating but changing slowly sound and images working together. Investigating minimal art -and got to-abstract expressionism.
Q: howso?
T: There is a field; there is room for coincidence [restraints= a series of conditions which result in an outcome.] Ambient video.
Cage
Brian Eno = ambient music = ambient video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNwYtllyt3Q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYCVke7TqlA
David Byrne= book on music
Books: Alex Ross: The Rest is Noise Fred Turner: The Democratic Surround (how since the 1940s the desire for total emersion developed) https://hub.xpub.nl/fabulousloopdeloop/index.php/The_Fabulous_Loop_de_Loop
What is the new question?: research in the parameters for my work. Look at parameters that exist in music and see how they could be applicable to video; look for instances in similar methods are applied (restraints, repetition)..
Plan:
Chapter 1: about my work; talk about my own parameters and methods. Analise my own obsessions and interests; examine my own modes of looking (gaze); how do my methods build into a work?.
Chapter 2: Diving into method by which minimal-serial music is made provides a lens for understanding my own work. Theoreis about ...
Chapter 3: what conclusion can we come to? What have we learned about the horizon of possibilities? Outline framework for methods (= what I want to capture).
Conclusion
Outcome for next meeting
Aim:
1: have chapter one written; have literature for chapter two ;
2: continue to make notes (record)
Key Dates and Deadlines
- 19 November - Graduate Proposal Deadline = DONE
- 19 November - Thesis Outline Deadline = DONE
- 3 Dec - Deadline First Chapter = ?
- 18 Feb - Deadline First Draft Thesis
- 18 March - Deadline Second Draft thesis (texts to 2nd readers)
- 1 April - Deadlines Second readers' comments
- 14 April - DEADLINE THESIS
Grading procedure (Thesis):
Early May: Steve, Marloes and Natasha draft feedback on the thesis texts they supervised
Mid-May: Steve, Marloes and Natasha review each other’s feedback and grades
End of May: Finalize feedback and grades.
Early June: Finalized feedback and grades communicated to students.