User:Rita Graca/specialissue8: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
 
(50 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<big>'''THE NETWORK WE (DE)SERVED'''</big>
== Infrastructour ==  
== Infrastructour ==  


Line 6: Line 8:
[[File:INFRASTRUCTOUR 01.jpg|300px]]
[[File:INFRASTRUCTOUR 01.jpg|300px]]


== Editing with Lídia Pereira ==  
== Editing ==  
=== 13/02/2019 ===
=== 13/02/2019 ===


Line 12: Line 14:
more in: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/special_issue_19_02_13
more in: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/special_issue_19_02_13


<b> Artemis && Simon </b>
Tancredi & Rita:


— Is the federated network orientated towards answering a common goal? How is it initiated?
— How can control and freedom co-exist inside a federated network that should allow different levels of moderation of content, choosing between using your identity or anonymity, content advisory …



— How is the common goal of the network shaped: is it formed in order to answer an internal need of the group?
— Is it possible to have a self-sustainable network? How can the federated systems address common goals of well-being, economic security, …?


— Is being a part of the network as important as being a custodian of it?
— In a future where decentralized and federated networks became the common practice, is there future for centralized and closed networks? Are there any benefits in a co-existence of both? Is convergence possible?


— Who maintains the network, what is its lifespan, and how can it be sustained with economic, ecological and time-efficient means? Is scale important in determining the mutual benefit to all members of the network?
=== 07/03/2019 ===
More in https://pad.xpub.nl/p/2019-03-27-rwrm


— Who are the caretakers of the network? How can their differences support the network, and by extension, each other?


— What are the connections and relationships to those outside of the network, and what channels of communication and resources are available to help include them?
'''Personal introduction to the ''Infrastructour'''''


— Is coexistence possible with non-federated networks? What attitudes/approaches will be useful in achieving this? Are they conceived as threats?
Before going to everyone’s house, we had to make sure we had access to our router, with a username and password. In most cases, the service companies seemed to leave everything as it came (a very username:admin, password:1234 approach). However, that wasn’t my case. The building where I live is managed by one company, and somehow me having access to any credentials would compromise the safety of other residents. I cannot explain this argument very well, not only because I lack the IT knowledge, but also because when I contacted the company that maintains the routers they didn’t know what “host your own server” meant. It seems that being self-hosted is not an aspiration shared by most individuals.


— Who owns the data produced/shared within the network? What type of measures are taken to ensure the protection of member's privacy?
This way, I had to rely on another person’s router (and goodwill) to host my own server. The first option was Tancredi’s place, but the lack of available network sockets was a constraint. I then became dependent on Artemis' house. Biyi usually calls the people who rely on other people’s servers “the parasites”, which is quite a good analogy if we think how we are literally sucking resources from our host.
Slowly we started to build our interdependencies inside the network.


Creating a network between ourselves, being nodes and sharing links with each other, seemed fascinating, but I wasn’t really sure what that actually meant, nor was I acquainted with the specific jargon.
Exploring our routers was the first step to becoming autonomous by hosting ourselves and starting to build digital evidence of our network, but that wasn’t a linear process. All the difficulties and hardship grew on me and I started wondering if there was a future for decentralized, self-hosted networks. If we, as students of the subject, found it hard to manage all the specifications of setting up a server, how could this ever become a comfortable norm?
In this way, I also speculated on some inconveniences, such as what would happen if someone moved house, changed routers, became a dead node in the network, etc. The sustainability of our digital bond was the trigger point for my personal research.
I started to look at other networks, physical or digital, online and offline. I was searching for common paths they followed, how they dealt with some problems that we were also encountering and for how long these networks survived. Alongside this, I was prototyping some tools, small experiments to scrape links, images, sources, anything that could prove that our network had existed at some point in space and time.
The documentation and anecdotes of other communities helped me understand better the focal point of my doubts: a digital network can indeed be fragile and ephemeral, but the cooperation aspect is important and I believe it can outlive the web version of a network.


<b>Biyi && Bo</b>
[[File:Specialissue8.jpg|300px]]


— How can we show outsiders to show that the alternatives are valuable than the mainstream? (ex. Facebook or Mastodon - network effect.) What contents this alternative will provide that will radically make everyone feel different? (anciety) (Geert Lovink's text.)
== Florian Cramer workshop ==


— Is there a critical point of the amount of nodes(users) that network has gathered to determine if it’s mainstream network? This critical point is defined by what? Would it be a market percentage? Or by public's preference? Whati is the consequences? in terms of economy etc..
Session one https://pad.xpub.nl/p/14_02_19_Florian_seminar_01<br />
Session two https://pad.xpub.nl/p/07_03_19_Florian_seminar_02


— Do the alternative federated networks want to preserve itself always as an alternative to mainstream, or do they aim to overthrow the mainstream overall? what are the assumption? Can alternative have this ambition? Should alternative have this ambition?
== Personal Research ==


Sustainability and finalicality of the platform:
[[File:Si8 event.jpg|600px| si8_event]]


— Should the alternative establishes a code of conduct (set rules) to control of its own behaviour to distinguish itself from the mainstream? (Ex. Facebook is gathering the information to sell data, pitching it  advertisement… )
=== Sketch of questions to work on===


— If you don’t do this mainstream, how can alternatives sustain themselves?
The very first goal of this trimester was setting up our home servers and starting hosting content online. But that was a challenge, has taken some time and energy, and even with all the support we had, some things weren’t working properly. E.g.: Not everyone could have the HTTPS, I couldn’t use SSH to connect to my network, …<br />
I was curious about the stability of our network and that was the trigger point for my personal research.


'''1 — Explore and see what happened to some networks: common paths they followed, duration, what happened after the collective ended, or if it is still continuing, etc.'''


<b> Tancredi && Rita</b>
I found a lot of broken links and pages, which didn’t give me a lot of information. However, in other networks, there was archives, documentation, texts, and anecdotes and that was very interesting to read. All of the testimonies recognized the importance of the spirit of cooperation.


— How can control and freedom co-exist inside a federated network that should allow different levels of moderation of content, choosing between using your identity or anonymity, content advisory …

[[File:Broken networks.gif|thumbnail|400px|left|Networks linking to broken links]]
<br clear=all>


— Is it possible to have a self-sustainable network? How can the federated systems address common goals of well-being, economic security, …?
'''2 — The question then arises: are all digital networks ephemeral? '''


— In a future where decentralized and federated networks became the common practice, is there future for centralized and closed networks? Are there any benefits in a co-existence of both? Is convergence possible?
In the digital world, networks have a hypothetical expiration date. If links and nodes are not ephemeral, at least they appear fragile. What happens to links when they stop working, what happens to a social media account when the owner dies, what will happen to the network we built this semester when one server goes down, or someone moves houses?


I started some prototypes as fun experiences. What type of traces the network and different nodes leave behind, the connections that worked, broken links vs active links, …


<b> Paloma && Pedro</b>


Economics:
Ideas:<br />


— What will you need to be start a network. What are the resources (money, people, infrastructures) for this network? And to maintain it?
image index (only images + metadata)<br />
link dump<br />
link scrapping h1 + one image<br />
link scrapping print screen (connection to web archive)<br />
sees if a link is dead = puts a rip dead icon in front (connection to Whole Earth Catalog)<br />
title index (scrapes h1 and orders alphabetically)<br />
interest index (keyword index)<br />


— What does the funding model represent? Who is behind it? Why are they funding this project? (eg. Telegram (APP that is private. Telegram messages are heavily encrypted and can self-destruct. Cloud-Based.), founders are owners of VK, Russian social platform)


— How is my network going to support an expansion? How is it going to grow? How will you deal with a network effect?
'''3 — So, in what ways can our digital network live on, find new paths, reproduce in print version, etc.'''


Politics:
It was important to make the prototypes readable, and this culminated in the Index page of the website (nothat.bad.mn)
The print version follows the same “parasite” idea of the project, infiltrating in each publication.


— Is there any hierarchy? What are the rules? And limits? And who is the one that creates them?
=== Documentation ===
On January 2019 we cycled through each other’s homes to set our personal servers. We were learning about routers, service providers, and trying to grasp the concept of ''network.'' In order to have a better understanding of the subject, I started to look for other groups similar to ours. Because networks can morph into different shapes, I focused on small partnerships to find out how they dealt with the accountability, sustainability, and scalability of their projects.<ref>Some authors (Ned Rossiter, Geert Lovink and more) believe that networks in order to survive need to have a form of organization similar to business models. Geert Lovink talks about the accountability, sustainability and scalability of networks in “The principle of notworking concepts in critical internet culture”.</ref> I started my research and quickly understood that most websites were linking other websites and I was caught in an infinite loop of click click clicks. However, most links were broken and servers were down. I was late, and I’d just missed the party.


— How to control the decentralisation of Networks and its content?
[[File:Obn links.png|thumbnail|400px|left|Old boys network linking other pages. "The links listed above are considered as a collection of ressources for old boys networkers."]]
<br clear=all>


— What is the governance model of this project? Who establishes the rules, are there any?
Keeping a network alive is a challenge well described in Andreas Broeckmann’s text about Mag.net.<ref>[http://postdigitalprint.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/magnet_reader_experiences_in_electronical_cultural_publishing.pdf The Mag.net reader Experiences in Electronical Cultural Publishing, edited by Miren Eraso, Alessandro Ludovico, Slavo Krekovic]</ref> Mag.net was a magazine network for independent electronic publishers. Following the idea “Collaboration is Better than Competition”, the network intended to be a support group for independent publications. This culminated in the creation of a common subscription system to increase circulation and boost sales. The initiative didn’t accomplish much success, and in 2005 the Mag.net members acknowledged the end of the collective. Nonetheless, is curious to see how projects that came out of Mag.net, or later through their members, still continue today. Broeckmann confirms that the “short history of Mag.net (...) should however not be read as an obituary, but as a monument to the desire for sharing and working together.” Maybe the main goal of a network doesn’t need to be a material object or a final project but is in the in-betweens that are created unusual connections. Some would call this the paranodal space.


Privacy:
I wasn’t worried about our websites going down, but I was thinking about what would be the reminders of our efforts to host and build this network. Being online all the time is impossible, and may be undesirable. High availability and uptime usually mean more servers, electricity, and pollution. In 2014, a collective discussion about feminist servers<ref>Feminist Server Discussion at THF, August 2014 (Calafou) [http://pad.constantvzw.org/p/feministserver pad.constantvzw.org/p/feministserver]</ref> addressed this apparent weakness with normality: “[A feminist server] tries hard not to apologize when she is sometimes not available”.


— How can you maintain privacy while keeping it possible for you to connect to other people. What is the code that I need to find a user? There is no network if you are not connected to anyone.
Cyberfeminism was often brought up during my search. I found networks created by feminist media activists such as the Grrrl Zine Network,<ref>[http://grrrlzines.net grrrlzines.net] </ref> FACES<ref>[http://faces-l.net faces-l.net]</ref> or the Old Boys Network.<ref>Old Boys Network, The Mode is the Message — the Code is the Collective! [http://obn.org/ obn.org/]</ref> The Old Boys Network is a network that started in 1997 dedicated to cyberfeminism and they describe themselves as “a real and a virtual coalition”. Indeed most digital networks have actual places for meetings, discussions, exhibitions, etc. In our network (which I now realize is nameless) we were meeting several times per week and that was an important time to discuss the path for our group publication.


— What are your kind of agreements? (In facebook you are either in or out.) How to prevent this? How to give some power to the user, will this mean you will have to create limits to their access?
Meetings in the physical world, ''IRL'', are a requirement of Netless.<ref>Netless, independent, urban communication platform
[http://k0a1a.net/netless/ k0a1a.net/netless/]</ref> This is a project using the city transportation grid to deliver information, where devices travel concealed in trains, buses, trams, and others. When different devices are close to each other it’s possible to exchange information. Netless tries to create a network that dodges internet fees and government surveillance, investing in peer-to-peer connections. However, it stills relies on infrastructures built and maintained by the government, which to me seems like a paradox. The more we speak about decentralized networks and autonomy, the more I wonder if complete independence is even possible, as infrastructures become vital for the existence of digital networks. I also have to deal with another level of dependency. Because I couldn’t host myself, my server borrows space and internet access from Artemis’ house.


— How am I going to be linked to other people, categories, in FB you are either a friend or not.
[[File:Netless-3-s.png|400px|left|thumbnail| Image of ''Netless'' network. A node in a train ]]
<br clear=all>


— What kind of relations are you going to allow, and what are you going to label them?
As our network was lodging itself, I started prototyping some tools to freeze moments in time. The tools serve this purpose in an experimental way, without trying to provide one solution to the instability of a network. Between broken links and ''404-pages'', I was facing the vulnerability with my project: collecting the connection points between nodes in our network.


=== 07/03/2019 ===
For me, the process of becoming self-hosted was complicated and I wonder how an intricated process can become accessible without the same support I had. I found beyond interesting the chat protocol we discovered and installed, ''XMPP''. Funny enough, our network would still discuss things on ''Whatsapp''. It was hassle-free, user-friendly with a clean design. Being an alternative in a market where corporations make such profit that gives them unlimited resources, can be discouraging.
More in https://pad.xpub.nl/p/2019-03-27-rwrm


In the end, is important to remark how our network exists in the physical world. Not only in the zine version of the website, but in the servers that we built, all the cables and hardware, the work put on the websites, the energy we used, the waste, and all the conversations and new relationships between the members.


'''Personal introduction to the ''Infrastructour'''''
<references/>


Before going to everyone’s house, we had to make sure we had access to our router, with a username and password. In most cases, the service companies seemed to leave everything as it came (a very username:admin, password:1234 approach). However, that wasn’t my case. The building where I live is managed by one company, and somehow me having access to any credentials would compromise the safety of other residents. I cannot explain this argument very well, not only because I lack the IT knowledge, but also because when I contacted the company that maintains the routers they didn’t know what “host your own server” meant. It seems that being self-hosted is not an aspiration shared by most individuals.
=== Prototyping Tools ===


This way, I had to rely on another person’s router (and goodwill) to host my own server. The first option was Tancredi’s place, but the lack of available network sockets was a constraint. I then became dependent on Artemis' house. Biyi usually calls the people who rely on other people’s servers “the parasites”, which is quite a good analogy if we think how we are literally sucking resources from our host.
These small scripts are written in Python and are based on web scraping methods. Web scraping is the process of gathering data, in this case, through automated actions. During this project, I was using these tools to crawl information from our network: images, the status of links, names of pages. By exploring and using this content I was hoping to overview the success or failure of our pages. The fragility of the network, but also the ability to grow and to discover new connections, really relates to our learning process throughout this trimester.  
Slowly we started to build our interdependencies inside the network.


Creating a network between ourselves, being nodes and sharing links with each other, seemed fascinating, but I wasn’t really sure what that actually meant, nor was I acquainted with the specific jargon.
[[File:Tool 1.png|thumbnail|500px|left|Sketch for the first tool]]
Exploring our routers was the first step to becoming autonomous by hosting ourselves and starting to build digital evidence of our network, but that wasn’t a linear process. All the difficulties and hardship grew on me and I started wondering if there was a future for decentralized, self-hosted networks. If we, as students of the subject, found it hard to manage all the specifications of setting up a server, how could this ever become a comfortable norm?
[[File:img_list_screenshot.png|thumbnail|500px|left|Results]]
In this way, I also speculated on some inconveniences, such as what would happen if someone moved house, changed routers, became a dead node in the network, etc. The sustainability of our digital bond was the trigger point for my personal research.
[[File:wayback_machine.png|thumbnail|500px|left|Wayback Machine Internet Archive]]
I started to look at other networks, physical or digital, online and offline. I was searching for common paths they followed, how they dealt with some problems that we were also encountering and for how long these networks survived. Alongside this, I was prototyping some tools, small experiments to scrape links, images, sources, anything that could prove that our network had existed at some point in space and time.
<br clear=all>
The documentation and anecdotes of other communities helped me understand better the focal point of my doubts: a digital network can indeed be fragile and ephemeral, but the cooperation aspect is important and I believe it can outlive the web version of a network.


== Florian Cramer workshop ==
You can find the scripts in the XPUB git repository: https://git.xpub.nl/rita/tools


Session one https://pad.xpub.nl/p/14_02_19_Florian_seminar_01<br />
[[File:Tool 2.png|thumbnail|500px|left|Sketch for the second tool]]
Session two https://pad.xpub.nl/p/07_03_19_Florian_seminar_02
[[File:status_list.png|thumbnail|500px|left|Results]]
[[File:Whole earth catalog.png|thumbnail|500px|left|Dead turtle in Whole Earth Catalog]]
<br clear=all>


== Personal Research ==
<br clear=all>


[[File:Si8 event.jpg|600px| si8_event]]
[[File:Tool 3.png|thumbnail|500px|left|Sketch for the third tool]]
[[File:url_list_screenshot.png|thumbnail|500px|left|Results]]
<br clear=all>


=== Server & Website ===


[http://nothat.bad.mn nothat.bad.mn]


On January 2019 we cycled through each other’s homes to set our personal servers. We were learning about routers, service providers, and trying to grasp the concept of ''network.'' In order to have a better understanding of the subject, I started to look for other groups similar to ours. Because networks can morph into different shapes, I focused on small partnerships to find out how they dealt with the accountability, sustainability, and scalability of their projects.<ref>Some authors (Ned Rossiter, Geert Lovink and more) believe that networks in order to survive need to have a form of organization similar to business models. Geert Lovink talks about the accountability, sustainability and scalability of networks in “The principle of notworking concepts in critical internet culture”.</ref> I started my research and quickly understood that most websites were linking other websites and I was caught in an infinite loop of click click clicks. However, most links were broken and servers were down. I was late, and I’d just missed the party.
Website archived in Git here: https://git.xpub.nl/rita/si8_personal_website


Keeping a network alive is a challenge well described in Andreas Broeckmann’s text about Mag.net.<ref>[http://postdigitalprint.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/magnet_reader_experiences_in_electronical_cultural_publishing.pdf The Mag.net reader Experiences in Electronical Cultural Publishing, edited by Miren Eraso, Alessandro Ludovico, Slavo Krekovic]</ref> Mag.net was a magazine network for independent electronic publishers. Following the idea “Collaboration is Better than Competition”, the network intended to be a support group for independent publications. This culminated in the creation of a common subscription system to increase circulation and boost sales. The initiative didn’t accomplish much success, and in 2005 the Mag.net members acknowledged the end of the collective. Nonetheless, is curious to see how projects that came out of Mag.net, or later through their members, still continue today. Broeckmann confirms that the “short history of Mag.net (...) should however not be read as an obituary, but as a monument to the desire for sharing and working together.” Maybe the main goal of a network doesn’t need to be a material object or a final project but is in the in-betweens that are created unusual connections. Some would call this the paranodal space.
[[File:Nothatbad1.png|frameless]]
[[File:Nothatbad2.png|frameless]]
[[File:Nothatbad3.png|frameless]]
[[File:Nothatbad4.PNG|frameless| 100px]]


I wasn’t worried about our websites going down, but I was thinking about what would be the reminders of our efforts to host and build this network. Being online all the time is impossible, and may be undesirable. High availability and uptime usually mean more servers, electricity, and pollution. In 2014, a collective discussion about feminist servers<ref>Feminist Server Discussion at THF, August 2014 (Calafou) [http://pad.constantvzw.org/p/feministserver pad.constantvzw.org/p/feministserver]</ref> addressed this apparent weakness with normality: “[A feminist server] tries hard not to apologize when she is sometimes not available”.
==Event==
===Publication===


Cyberfeminism was often brought up during my search. I found networks created by feminist media activists such as the Grrrl Zine Network,<ref>[http://grrrlzines.net grrrlzines.net] </ref> FACES<ref>[http://faces-l.net faces-l.net]</ref> or the Old Boys Network.<ref>Old Boys Network, The Mode is the Message — the Code is the Collective! [http://obn.org/ obn.org/]</ref> The Old Boys Network is a network that started in 1997 dedicated to cyberfeminism and they describe themselves as “a real and a virtual coalition”. Indeed most digital networks have actual places for meetings, discussions, exhibitions, etc. In our network (which I now realize is nameless) we were meeting several times per week and that was an important time to discuss the path for our group publication.
[[File:Si8 event2.jpg|300px|frameless|text-top]]


Meetings in the physical world, ''IRL'', are a requirement of Netless.<ref>Netless, independent, urban communication platform
[http://k0a1a.net/netless/ k0a1a.net/netless/]</ref> This is a project using the city transportation grid to deliver information, where devices travel concealed in trains, buses, trams, and others. When different devices are close to each other it’s possible to exchange information. Netless tries to create a network that dodges internet fees and government surveillance, investing in peer-to-peer connections. However, it stills relies on infrastructures built and maintained by the government, which to me seems like a paradox. The more we speak about decentralized networks and autonomy, the more I wonder if complete independence is even possible, as infrastructures become vital for the existence of digital networks. I also have to deal with another level of dependency. Because I couldn’t host myself, my server borrows space and internet access from Artemis’ house.


As our network was lodging itself, I started prototyping some tools to freeze moments in time. The tools serve this purpose in an experimental way, without trying to provide one solution to the instability of a network. Between broken links and ''404-pages'', I was facing the vulnerability with my project: collecting the connection points between nodes in our network.
Stickers questioning the audience: "What networks you are not a part of anymore?"<br />


For me, the process of becoming self-hosted was complicated and I wonder how an intricated process can become accessible without the same support I had. I found beyond interesting the chat protocol we discovered and installed, ''XMPP''. Funny enough, our network would still discuss things on ''Whatsapp''. It was hassle-free, user-friendly with a clean design. Being an alternative in a market where corporations make such profit that gives them unlimited resources, can be discouraging.
[[File:Event interaction.jpg|300px|frameless|text-top]]


In the end, is important to remark how our network exists in the physical world. Not only in the zine version of the website, but in the servers that we built, all the cables and hardware, the work put on the websites, the energy we used, the waste, and all the conversations and new relationships between the members.
===Wrapper===


<references/>
Introduction booklet: [[File:Infrastructourintro.pdf|thumbnail]]<br />


Box:


[[File:Si8 box1.jpg|300px|frameless|text-top]]
[[File:Si8 box2.jpg|300px|frameless|text-top]]


[[Category:WttF]]
[[Category:WttF]]

Latest revision as of 11:40, 20 May 2020

THE NETWORK WE (DE)SERVED

Infrastructour

Infrastructour page


INFRASTRUCTOUR 01.jpg

Editing

13/02/2019

more in: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/special_issue_19_02_13

Tancredi & Rita:

— How can control and freedom co-exist inside a federated network that should allow different levels of moderation of content, choosing between using your identity or anonymity, content advisory …


— Is it possible to have a self-sustainable network? How can the federated systems address common goals of well-being, economic security, …?

— In a future where decentralized and federated networks became the common practice, is there future for centralized and closed networks? Are there any benefits in a co-existence of both? Is convergence possible?

07/03/2019

More in https://pad.xpub.nl/p/2019-03-27-rwrm


Personal introduction to the Infrastructour

Before going to everyone’s house, we had to make sure we had access to our router, with a username and password. In most cases, the service companies seemed to leave everything as it came (a very username:admin, password:1234 approach). However, that wasn’t my case. The building where I live is managed by one company, and somehow me having access to any credentials would compromise the safety of other residents. I cannot explain this argument very well, not only because I lack the IT knowledge, but also because when I contacted the company that maintains the routers they didn’t know what “host your own server” meant. It seems that being self-hosted is not an aspiration shared by most individuals.

This way, I had to rely on another person’s router (and goodwill) to host my own server. The first option was Tancredi’s place, but the lack of available network sockets was a constraint. I then became dependent on Artemis' house. Biyi usually calls the people who rely on other people’s servers “the parasites”, which is quite a good analogy if we think how we are literally sucking resources from our host. Slowly we started to build our interdependencies inside the network.

Creating a network between ourselves, being nodes and sharing links with each other, seemed fascinating, but I wasn’t really sure what that actually meant, nor was I acquainted with the specific jargon. Exploring our routers was the first step to becoming autonomous by hosting ourselves and starting to build digital evidence of our network, but that wasn’t a linear process. All the difficulties and hardship grew on me and I started wondering if there was a future for decentralized, self-hosted networks. If we, as students of the subject, found it hard to manage all the specifications of setting up a server, how could this ever become a comfortable norm? In this way, I also speculated on some inconveniences, such as what would happen if someone moved house, changed routers, became a dead node in the network, etc. The sustainability of our digital bond was the trigger point for my personal research. I started to look at other networks, physical or digital, online and offline. I was searching for common paths they followed, how they dealt with some problems that we were also encountering and for how long these networks survived. Alongside this, I was prototyping some tools, small experiments to scrape links, images, sources, anything that could prove that our network had existed at some point in space and time. The documentation and anecdotes of other communities helped me understand better the focal point of my doubts: a digital network can indeed be fragile and ephemeral, but the cooperation aspect is important and I believe it can outlive the web version of a network.

Specialissue8.jpg

Florian Cramer workshop

Session one https://pad.xpub.nl/p/14_02_19_Florian_seminar_01
Session two https://pad.xpub.nl/p/07_03_19_Florian_seminar_02

Personal Research

si8_event

Sketch of questions to work on

The very first goal of this trimester was setting up our home servers and starting hosting content online. But that was a challenge, has taken some time and energy, and even with all the support we had, some things weren’t working properly. E.g.: Not everyone could have the HTTPS, I couldn’t use SSH to connect to my network, …
I was curious about the stability of our network and that was the trigger point for my personal research.

1 — Explore and see what happened to some networks: common paths they followed, duration, what happened after the collective ended, or if it is still continuing, etc.

I found a lot of broken links and pages, which didn’t give me a lot of information. However, in other networks, there was archives, documentation, texts, and anecdotes and that was very interesting to read. All of the testimonies recognized the importance of the spirit of cooperation.

Networks linking to broken links


2 — The question then arises: are all digital networks ephemeral?

In the digital world, networks have a hypothetical expiration date. If links and nodes are not ephemeral, at least they appear fragile. What happens to links when they stop working, what happens to a social media account when the owner dies, what will happen to the network we built this semester when one server goes down, or someone moves houses?

I started some prototypes as fun experiences. What type of traces the network and different nodes leave behind, the connections that worked, broken links vs active links, …


Ideas:

image index (only images + metadata)
link dump
link scrapping h1 + one image
link scrapping print screen (connection to web archive)
sees if a link is dead = puts a rip dead icon in front (connection to Whole Earth Catalog)
title index (scrapes h1 and orders alphabetically)
interest index (keyword index)


3 — So, in what ways can our digital network live on, find new paths, reproduce in print version, etc.

It was important to make the prototypes readable, and this culminated in the Index page of the website (nothat.bad.mn) The print version follows the same “parasite” idea of the project, infiltrating in each publication.

Documentation

On January 2019 we cycled through each other’s homes to set our personal servers. We were learning about routers, service providers, and trying to grasp the concept of network. In order to have a better understanding of the subject, I started to look for other groups similar to ours. Because networks can morph into different shapes, I focused on small partnerships to find out how they dealt with the accountability, sustainability, and scalability of their projects.[1] I started my research and quickly understood that most websites were linking other websites and I was caught in an infinite loop of click click clicks. However, most links were broken and servers were down. I was late, and I’d just missed the party.

Old boys network linking other pages. "The links listed above are considered as a collection of ressources for old boys networkers."


Keeping a network alive is a challenge well described in Andreas Broeckmann’s text about Mag.net.[2] Mag.net was a magazine network for independent electronic publishers. Following the idea “Collaboration is Better than Competition”, the network intended to be a support group for independent publications. This culminated in the creation of a common subscription system to increase circulation and boost sales. The initiative didn’t accomplish much success, and in 2005 the Mag.net members acknowledged the end of the collective. Nonetheless, is curious to see how projects that came out of Mag.net, or later through their members, still continue today. Broeckmann confirms that the “short history of Mag.net (...) should however not be read as an obituary, but as a monument to the desire for sharing and working together.” Maybe the main goal of a network doesn’t need to be a material object or a final project but is in the in-betweens that are created unusual connections. Some would call this the paranodal space.

I wasn’t worried about our websites going down, but I was thinking about what would be the reminders of our efforts to host and build this network. Being online all the time is impossible, and may be undesirable. High availability and uptime usually mean more servers, electricity, and pollution. In 2014, a collective discussion about feminist servers[3] addressed this apparent weakness with normality: “[A feminist server] tries hard not to apologize when she is sometimes not available”.

Cyberfeminism was often brought up during my search. I found networks created by feminist media activists such as the Grrrl Zine Network,[4] FACES[5] or the Old Boys Network.[6] The Old Boys Network is a network that started in 1997 dedicated to cyberfeminism and they describe themselves as “a real and a virtual coalition”. Indeed most digital networks have actual places for meetings, discussions, exhibitions, etc. In our network (which I now realize is nameless) we were meeting several times per week and that was an important time to discuss the path for our group publication.

Meetings in the physical world, IRL, are a requirement of Netless.[7] This is a project using the city transportation grid to deliver information, where devices travel concealed in trains, buses, trams, and others. When different devices are close to each other it’s possible to exchange information. Netless tries to create a network that dodges internet fees and government surveillance, investing in peer-to-peer connections. However, it stills relies on infrastructures built and maintained by the government, which to me seems like a paradox. The more we speak about decentralized networks and autonomy, the more I wonder if complete independence is even possible, as infrastructures become vital for the existence of digital networks. I also have to deal with another level of dependency. Because I couldn’t host myself, my server borrows space and internet access from Artemis’ house.

Image of Netless network. A node in a train


As our network was lodging itself, I started prototyping some tools to freeze moments in time. The tools serve this purpose in an experimental way, without trying to provide one solution to the instability of a network. Between broken links and 404-pages, I was facing the vulnerability with my project: collecting the connection points between nodes in our network.

For me, the process of becoming self-hosted was complicated and I wonder how an intricated process can become accessible without the same support I had. I found beyond interesting the chat protocol we discovered and installed, XMPP. Funny enough, our network would still discuss things on Whatsapp. It was hassle-free, user-friendly with a clean design. Being an alternative in a market where corporations make such profit that gives them unlimited resources, can be discouraging.

In the end, is important to remark how our network exists in the physical world. Not only in the zine version of the website, but in the servers that we built, all the cables and hardware, the work put on the websites, the energy we used, the waste, and all the conversations and new relationships between the members.

  1. ↑ Some authors (Ned Rossiter, Geert Lovink and more) believe that networks in order to survive need to have a form of organization similar to business models. Geert Lovink talks about the accountability, sustainability and scalability of networks in “The principle of notworking concepts in critical internet culture”.
  2. ↑ The Mag.net reader Experiences in Electronical Cultural Publishing, edited by Miren Eraso, Alessandro Ludovico, Slavo Krekovic
  3. ↑ Feminist Server Discussion at THF, August 2014 (Calafou) pad.constantvzw.org/p/feministserver
  4. ↑ grrrlzines.net
  5. ↑ faces-l.net
  6. ↑ Old Boys Network, The Mode is the Message — the Code is the Collective! obn.org/
  7. ↑ Netless, independent, urban communication platform k0a1a.net/netless/

Prototyping Tools

These small scripts are written in Python and are based on web scraping methods. Web scraping is the process of gathering data, in this case, through automated actions. During this project, I was using these tools to crawl information from our network: images, the status of links, names of pages. By exploring and using this content I was hoping to overview the success or failure of our pages. The fragility of the network, but also the ability to grow and to discover new connections, really relates to our learning process throughout this trimester.

Sketch for the first tool
Results
Wayback Machine Internet Archive


You can find the scripts in the XPUB git repository: https://git.xpub.nl/rita/tools

Sketch for the second tool
Results
Dead turtle in Whole Earth Catalog



Sketch for the third tool
Results


Server & Website

nothat.bad.mn

Website archived in Git here: https://git.xpub.nl/rita/si8_personal_website

Nothatbad1.png Nothatbad2.png Nothatbad3.png Nothatbad4.PNG

Event

Publication

Si8 event2.jpg


Stickers questioning the audience: "What networks you are not a part of anymore?"

Event interaction.jpg

Wrapper

Introduction booklet: File:Infrastructourintro.pdf

Box:

Si8 box1.jpg Si8 box2.jpg

Retrieved from "https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mw-mediadesign/index.php?title=User:Rita_Graca/specialissue8&oldid=172084"