Andreas EYE Moodboard: Difference between revisions
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
How is the moving image becoming its sense? Where does this sense end? And if it ends, what is beyond this end? This exercise is trying to find the „modest“ or „appropriate“ amount of communication. It shall remove decoration, accessories and digression or even add all these redundancies to find the essence of the disobedient narrative. | How is the moving image becoming its sense? Where does this sense end? And if it ends, what is beyond this end? This exercise is trying to find the „modest“ or „appropriate“ amount of communication. It shall remove decoration, accessories and digression or even add all these redundancies to find the essence of the disobedient narrative. | ||
20. November 2018: | '''20. November 2018:''' | ||
The term of brevitas has been explored a lot in verbal/written communication extensively [[As much as necessary - as less as possible|(see my research on that here)]] Also in product design, architecture (baroque vs minimalist design) or visual communication there has been big research on the topic of reduction vs excess. I want to explore „brevitas“ in moving image and bring it into a series of semiotics. | The term of brevitas has been explored a lot in verbal/written communication extensively [[As much as necessary - as less as possible|(see my research on that here)]] Also in product design, architecture (baroque vs minimalist design) or visual communication there has been big research on the topic of reduction vs excess. I want to explore „brevitas“ in moving image and bring it into a series of semiotics. | ||
Revision as of 17:16, 5 December 2018
1) individual presentation
What are you planning to make?
Work in progress How is the moving image becoming its sense? Where does this sense end? And if it ends, what is beyond this end? This exercise is trying to find the „modest“ or „appropriate“ amount of communication. It shall remove decoration, accessories and digression or even add all these redundancies to find the essence of the disobedient narrative.
20. November 2018:
The term of brevitas has been explored a lot in verbal/written communication extensively (see my research on that here) Also in product design, architecture (baroque vs minimalist design) or visual communication there has been big research on the topic of reduction vs excess. I want to explore „brevitas“ in moving image and bring it into a series of semiotics.
It will be non-linear.
References
Narrative inspiration:
Quentin Dupieux – WRONG (sundance teaser)
Visual inspiration for minimalism and excess:
Jonas Lindström – ES WAR GUT ABER DAS IST BESSER
Jonas Lindström – MMOTHS – EVA
metahaven – THE SPRAWL (Propaganda about Propaganda) Trailer
Starting points
Research on the topic As much as necessary - as less as possible in relation to modern media reception. In terms of creating the visuals I would just start doing asap to create imagery that can be talked about. Feedback is essential.
2) collaboration
Possible