Unintended Images: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Graduation work
{{Graduation work
|Creator=Artyom
|Creator=Artyom Kocharyan
|Date=2015
|Date=2015
|Bio=Artyom Kocharyan (AM) is visual artist based in Rotterdam. His work explores the contemporary visual culture, namely the culture of images that increasingly dominate the world of communication. Artyom’s work is concerned with the representation aspect of images and their ability to determine our vision of the world. Artyom is engaged with the representation apparatus that is peculiar to current digital and online culture.
|Bio=Artyom Kocharyan (AM) is a visual artist based in Rotterdam. His work explores the peculiarities of current image culture, namely the relationship between images and technology that encompasses them.
|Thumbnail=Screen Shot 2014-10-26 at 16.10.08.jpg
|Thumbnail=Vietnam-3.jpg
|Website=www.artyomkocharyan.com
|Website=http://www.artyomkocharyan.com/
|Description=Artyom’s work entitled “New Image” is a series of images of that have been made using Google Image search results. In his work Artyom explores the relations between images and the technology that is responsible for their production and distribution. Namely how technological endeavors came to affect the dynamics within image culture.  
|Description=“Unintended Images” is a series of digital paintings based on Google’s image search. Artyom uses screenshots of search results, exploring the multiplicity of images within them. Drawing inspiration from painting, particularly those of Pieter Bruegel the Elder, that regardless their overcrowded aesthetics managed to retain a coherent composition. Artyom’s work reflects on the inability of Google’s search results to be read as a whole and attempts to introduce the coherence of a single image.
With the advance of digital cameras and Internet images moved from the era of analogue photography and printed media as its agency of distribution, to the new era of digital imagery and numerous online databases. Google Images is arguably the most important distributor of images within this context. It serves as the agency that stands in between the user and the images that are stored in different corners of the web. It function as an encyclopedia that is able to give a visual representation of any given subject, even to ones of abstract and metaphysical nature.}}
|Catalog-Text1=Apocalypse (Viet-google.jpg - turned vertically+title+full page)
}}


Photography, shortly after its invention, took on itself the responsibility of documenting history and giving us images of our world that was previously granted to painting. Photography was the first image of the kind, one that is conceived through technologies – camera, that were products of modern science. Photography democratized the image making proses allowing anyone to produce an image with a click of a button. As well us taking images out from the realm of aesthetics and art which was peculiar to painting, and making them relevant to almost every aspect of culture. As technology developed giving us television and the general media establishment, the bigger part of our world became to be seen through those images than by our own eyes. In today’s online world images function as distinct communication medium and seem do be a better fit to the quick and accumulated online culture where they serve as windows through which we can access the world far beyond our reach.
<gallery>
File:Vietnam-3.jpg
File:Viet-google.jpg
File:Bruegel.jpg|Pieter Bruegel the Elder “Netherlandish Proverbs” (1559)
</gallery>


Photography as an image is known for its ability to give an objective representation of the world – it shows the world ‘as it is’. This notion although has been disproved by number of studies, is till excepted by the wider culture. Because of it scientific nature, namely the fact that the subject prescribes itself on the film without the involvement of human hand – without human subjectivity, photography came to gain its objective status. This notion went as far as making photography an image that can stand as a ‘proof’ for something. Similarly Google Images established itself as an agency that gives a precise and accurate representation of a subject. Its algorithms that developed in such way to display the most relevant and the most popular images of the subject. So its objective notion seems to rely again on its scientific factor, namely on the algorithmic analysis that automatically choose the content and arranging them by their on the page by their relevance.
As a result of image proliferation the online world become a space where images appear to their viewer within multiplicity. Google’s image search is a prime example of this phenomenon. By gathering multiple images inside one space, Google creates a new ‘large image’ that is being framed within our computer screens. However as a tool that is intended to find single images, Google disregards the aesthetic form of those ‘large images’, which it creates rather unintentionally. It arranges individual images within the search result according to their relevance to the topic rather then their visual coherence with each other. As a result those images appear as ‘broken’ and fragmented, and refuse to be read as a single image.
 
Artyom’s work reflects on the incoherence that comes with the multiplicity of images within the online world. He uses screenshots of different Google search results, which he manipulates in Photoshop by using ‘healing’ and ‘patching’ tools. For his work Artyom draws inspiration from painting, particularly those of Pieter Bruegel the Elder, which regardless of their overcrowded and noisy aesthetics managed to retain their wholeness as an image. Those paintings took into account the gaze of the viewer, providing pathways through which the human eye could travel and explore the image. Similar Artyom’s work attempts to rehabilitate those ‘broken’ images and reintroduce a coherence that would allow them to be read as a whole.

Latest revision as of 16:34, 13 February 2017

Unintended Images
Creator Artyom Kocharyan
Year 2015
Bio Artyom Kocharyan (AM) is a visual artist based in Rotterdam. His work explores the peculiarities of current image culture, namely the relationship between images and technology that encompasses them.
Thumbnail
Vietnam-3.jpg
Website http://www.artyomkocharyan.com/

“Unintended Images” is a series of digital paintings based on Google’s image search. Artyom uses screenshots of search results, exploring the multiplicity of images within them. Drawing inspiration from painting, particularly those of Pieter Bruegel the Elder, that regardless their overcrowded aesthetics managed to retain a coherent composition. Artyom’s work reflects on the inability of Google’s search results to be read as a whole and attempts to introduce the coherence of a single image.



As a result of image proliferation the online world become a space where images appear to their viewer within multiplicity. Google’s image search is a prime example of this phenomenon. By gathering multiple images inside one space, Google creates a new ‘large image’ that is being framed within our computer screens. However as a tool that is intended to find single images, Google disregards the aesthetic form of those ‘large images’, which it creates rather unintentionally. It arranges individual images within the search result according to their relevance to the topic rather then their visual coherence with each other. As a result those images appear as ‘broken’ and fragmented, and refuse to be read as a single image.

Artyom’s work reflects on the incoherence that comes with the multiplicity of images within the online world. He uses screenshots of different Google search results, which he manipulates in Photoshop by using ‘healing’ and ‘patching’ tools. For his work Artyom draws inspiration from painting, particularly those of Pieter Bruegel the Elder, which regardless of their overcrowded and noisy aesthetics managed to retain their wholeness as an image. Those paintings took into account the gaze of the viewer, providing pathways through which the human eye could travel and explore the image. Similar Artyom’s work attempts to rehabilitate those ‘broken’ images and reintroduce a coherence that would allow them to be read as a whole.