User:Ssstephen/Reading/1988 interview about technical revolution

https://youtu.be/lyfOcAAcoH8?feature=shared

the structure of images involved a specific way of looking at the world which is the mythical way

and (this note written after the next to be less linear) in breughel the most mystical images are the deepest into the picture, a demon speaking with an angel far into the sky, a cross or gallows deep back on a hilltop.

hostorical progressive thinking is being replaced by a new type of thinking that i would like to call systemic or structural

maybe. but multithreading is usually an illusion. not to say it cant have an effective apparent parallelism. and not to say that serial is in any way better, it is in many ways worse. but i suppose right now im questioning is this really non linearity, can we break further. in a breughel painting it is impossible to resist being pulled into the distance, being sunk to ground. to the extent that the figures are hard to focus on. berlant says something about flatness when they are talking about in the air in the commons chapter:

another use of flatness: to put a wedge in causality. here the liberal world picture crashes to the floor as the group stands still in the absence of confidence about connection

abraham moles