SI17 summaries of group meetings

08.02.2022

Facilitators of meeting: Kimberley, Chae

Pad: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/role-playing-structure

Summary

Chae and Kimberley prepared the role play game Experimental kitchen for us. Every one of us got a a random role attributed that we needed to embody during our group meeting. The goal of the meeting was to change group dynamics while still trying to find consent when discussing the SI17.

Things we discussed:

Keep the historic part shortly. Wouldn't it be better to read on our own and use the meetings to take actual decisions?
Implement methods for discussion and decision taking (maybe ask ref to Cristina/Manetta?)
We don't know yet how we will use the prototyping classes for SI17.
Purpose and use of meetings: Use the meeting as decision moments rather then production.
2 facilitators/ meeting

Pay attention to: Have a clear idea about the principles of a loot box and how we want to change/intervene/disrupt its ideology ASAP

the need for research the history of loot boxes and to ask Steve to elaborate on this
When we have in our minds what a classic loot box is, we can think better strategies to subvert it.
The importance for good work distribution and everyone's well being
The importance on realistic goals because when we have too many good ideas on table we don't have time to finish them.

Let's discuss first ideas sooner of what message do we want to pass on; who is the audience and how can we present the project? Once we have a concept of it, we can elaborate on more prototypes of how it would look like. We need to have a clear idea of what a "classic" loot box is as soon as possible and then also bring concrete options of how we could interpret the principles of a loot box to subvert it?
Maybe we can also really ask to use the prototyping classes for production and at some point stop getting more input?

To action:

Formulate a demand to Steve for next wednesday's class (writing exercise to define the lootbox and what we want to subvert from it)
Pre-Launch Event @ PNF - 23rd WED (9:00-13:00) or 21st Mon (??:??-??:??)

18.02.2022

Facilitators of meeting: Erica, Mitsa

Pad: https://hub.xpub.nl/soupboat/pad/p/group_meeting_18022022

Summary

Possible loot box scenarios:

Form:

scenario 1: the loot box is a physical box that contains something (f.e.: perfumed shiny coloured box, or jewelryb ox or like a gift or... )

scenario 2: The loot box is not a box but another object that contains something (it's a usb-key, a jar, a shrine ...)

scenario 3: The loot box is not a box but a physical object that points or redirects towards something else (f.e.: glasses you wear, something you already own, something you don't have, a gift card, an invitation to do something)

Features:

traditional loot box

scenario1 1: the loot box works as a traditional loot box, you buy it at the store and its contents are a critique about lootboxes, gamification, labour etc.

Accessibility scenario:

Scenario 2: The loot-box can be accessed (= opened or purchased) upon solving a quest (a puzzle?)

Scenario 3: The loot-box can be accessed with a key (password, physical key).

Scenario 4: The loot box can be accessed after following a set of instructions.

Scenario 5: The loot-box can be purchased under a set of conditions.

Community/audience building scenario:

Scenario 6: The purchase of the loot-box grants an access to a community. It is possible to chat/meet with other loot-box owners.

Scenario 7: The items in the loot-box are complementary and it is necessary to connect with other loot-box owners in order to assemble the pieces together.

Scenario 8: The purchase of a loot-box can only be made if it involves more than one individual.

Contents:

collection of different games scenarios:

scenario 1: the loot box is a collection of well known games with uncommon rules

scenario 2: the loot box is a collection of the prototyped games we did so far curated in some kind of form (matrioska boxes, critical settimana enigmistica, onesentencegame etc)

scenario 3: the loot box is a collection of mini-games + an ultimate game that has to be performed with other players that purchased the LB

Variation on the same item scenarios:

scenario 4: the loot box contains a variation of something (cards, maps, mazes, fortune cookies, annotated texts, advices to gamificate your life) on the themes we have discussed so far

scenario 5: the loot box is the same game but every week the rules change (through online platform)

scenario 6: the loot box contains a series of jigsaw puzzles but their pieces are scattered through all the boxes and there is a platform online where you can see the missing tiles.

Single game scenarios:

scenario 7: the loot box is a karaoke with some instructions or added text-based material

scenario 8: the loot box is a RPG (with cards or masks) that allows players/payers to interact

scenario 9: the loot box is a usb stick with a modding program or a crack (also a crack for our game)

scenario 10: the loot box is a book (something between a D&D manual and the crosswords thing)

21.02.2022

Facilitators of meeting: Miriam, Gersande

Pad: https://hub.xpub.nl/soupboat/pad/p/group_meeting_21022022

Summary

Dates set:

Pre-Launch: 16th (9.00 to 13.00) Installation: Monday 21 (9:00-13:00), Wednesday 23 (9:00-13:00) and of course Friday 25 (from 9:00 onward)

Form:

The loot box is one format. It has a modular shape and same size in order to be able to display it in various ways, together or alone. The design of all the box is the same, with variations in additional features (stickers, price tags, labels, or else).

To discuss/propose/prototype:

The size of the box
The shape of the box
The design (color/content) on the box
Additional features

Focus of the box: the surprise inside!

Features and public intentions:

Present traditional features of a loot box
Relatable games inside the box with socio-critical twist
Play with the public’s expectations

Loot box can be accessed/distributed within the context of certain conditions/instructions
Limited amount of LB purchased at once
Time challenge: instant vs. delayed gratification/reward

The loot box should give something not just take something
Subvert idea collectible by inserting meaningful contents in collectible items

Community building: the purchase of the loot box grants access to a community
Cannot be use alone
Online platform to chat
Online platform to share/archive game outcomes
Accentuate collectiveness through small production features
Continue to share your experiences with the loot box after purchasing it

Monetary value (prices) of the LB should have a twist to it
Different prices, same content

Balance single player/multi-player aspect of the LB

Content:

Overall

Use the material we gathered in class until now as core of the games
Physical game(s) or token(s) for online ones
Aware audience but don’t need to over-explain the critic> discussion with public? (PLACEBO/SOBER Lootbox) (program launch)

Two main currents

Multiple games (already prototyped/made in class or similar to them) curated in a more or less random way within one LB, needs to have some kind of common thread to attach them
Collection of mini-games
The “ultimate game”: a game within the game (connected to the community building)
See Chae’s proposal see image

One game or one kind of game declined in different variations in the LBs
Might offer less diversity but brings focus and consistency
Share outcomes and experience online (can also be done with multiple games)
See Kamo&Erica’s proposal: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/chaotic-evil-puzzles

Launch:

Display made with identical Loot boxes
Appealing display
Emphasise surprise feature

The Launch is a game
Space for experiment, leisure, excitement
Play with the LB during the launch

Epic introduction where the Loot Boxes came from
Have public reflect/critic/question LB’s topics and mechanisms on their own
Discussions during the launch

Accentuate collectiveness of the LB
Publication fit to experienced and non-experienced public
Public should have agency over the LB

Scatter the “ultimate game” during launch

Aftermath and benefits

Line of conduct
The LB goes beyond the launch
What do we wanna do with the benefits made with the publication?
Produce more copies with earnings
Swap remaining copies

Yet to be discussed:

Price loot-box
Selling/buying restriction
Community (multiplayer game)

Updates and thoughts

(dump your ideas/additions/thoughts/fears here)

28.02.2022

Facilitators of meeting: Emma, Supi

Pad: https://hub.xpub.nl/soupboat/pad/p/group_meeting_28022022

Summary

Decision making:

1.) Describe what/how you see the loot box

   1.) FORM: one item (+ small publication) or several items (ex: jigsaw, booklets, sticky notes, usb stick)
   2.) INTERACTION: physical + digital (online platform for community/collaboration)
   3.) TOPIC: a reflection of one topic but with different approaches/angles/learnings/POV

2.) Work distribution

   a.) Only the game inside
   b.) Only the box
   c.) Only the line of conduct/launch/narrative around the box

3.) Surface

   a.) One surface, one content
   b.) One surface, several contents
   c.) Multiple surfaces & contents

Concerns:

- forcing different types of content to work all together in one surface

- rigid form means you can only focus on making the visual image

- too many things interconnecting

- unbalanced workload

- production: time constraint - can we make so many different items?

Insights:

- the surprise moment is based on the fact that we have different things

- fixed form = we can focus on the content

- the (drawing) is a gate to other games

Questions:

- what does it mean to have one content?

- a game inside a game–is this a problem?

- what are we individually interested in bringing inside the box?

- what do we want to put inside the box? (see list of prototypes)

- what would make us happier?

Updates and thoughts

(dump your ideas/additions/thoughts/fears here)