Calendars:Networked Media Calendar/Networked Media Calendar/14-06-2022 -Event 2

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki

LB2: Final assessment: 9:00 - 18:30, day-2, as chair: Simon Pummell, with assessors Rossella Nisio, Cihad Caner, Barend Onneweer; Natasha Soobramanien as notetaker and external examiner Mieke Bernink (plus Laura Huertas Millan as an observer) in the small project space WH4.139

Please have your assessment presentation archived by the start of the day Thursday the 9th, this preliminary presentation is just to give the assessors a chance to read over what you are preparing to show. You have the weekend to tweak them. [link below of page]

  • And, please send via wetransfer the same documents to Ine, Leslie and Simon. Leslie will forward them to Mieke Bernink.
    • 20 Minutes: give a presentation, making use of the wiki and/or any visual presentation you create to show us: your graduation project (and thesis should they overlap and support each other)
    • 10 Minutes: the panel can ask questions regarding what you presented
    • 15 Minutes: we ask you to leave, so the panel can discuss your research and presentation
    • 20 minutes: we will discuss with you your Final project and give you feedback.
    • 5 minutes: panel compare notes and finalise decisions
    • Total per student:  1 hour 10 minutes
  • 09:00 - 09:15 day 2 assessor meet and greet
  • 09:15- 10:25 CANDIDATE 08 - Adèle Grégoire
  • 10:25- 11.35 CANDIDATE 09 - Luca Tichelman

11.35 - 11.50 15 MINUTES BREAK

  • 11.50: - 13.00. CANDIDATE 10 - Sacha Dufils
  • 13.00- 14.10. CANDIDATE 11. Georgiana Barcan

14.:10 -14.55 —-> 45 MINUTE LUNCH BREAK

  • 14.55 - 16.05 CANDIDATE 12. - Alecio Ferrari
  • 16.05 - 17:15 CANDIDATE 13 - Dachen Bao
  • 17.15 - 18.00 CANDIDATE 14- - SIMON B - TRIMESTER 02 ASSESSMENT
  • 18:00 - 18.30 - wrap-up - and final grade confirmation

WdKA student archive: https://hrnl.sharepoint.com/sites/WdKA-XPub/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?id=%2Fsites%2FWdKA%2DXPub%2FShared%20Documents%2FLB%2DXPUB%2DArchive%2FMFAD%5Ftrim1%2D6%5FStudWorkA%5F2020%2D2022%2FLB%2F49114%5F99%2DMFAD%5FLB%5Ftrim05%2D06%2FMDCSDR56LB%5FTrim05%2D06%5F2020%2D2022%5FSDR&viewid=e14ca528%2D7cdc%2D46e3%2Dbabb%2Dc8a8797f2268


  • as taken from the handbook 2021-2022

Assessment Criteria for a Graduation Project   The graduation project should result in a presentation of new work, that combined with the thesis demonstrates the student’s attainment of the agreed learning outcomes (as laid out in the Course handbook Section 3.2 ).  In this way the programmes’ agreed Final Competencies from the basis of the Assessment Criteria for a Graduation Project at a Master level. 

    1.	Creative ability: They have developed the independent learning ability required to create innovative, challenging, significant, and coherent projects that are based on clearly articulated approaches and intention. 
    2.	Capacity to conduct self-directed research: They can identify relevant subject matter, questions, and formulate distinct areas of research. 
    3.	Research methodologies: They can harness skills of research, analysis and synthesis to the development of creative projects. 
    4.	Technical fluency: They can demonstrate an analytical grasp of the underlying technical and conceptual principles of practices relevant to their field and work. 
    5.	Organisational skills: They have the capacity to design, manage and execute effectively, complex and creative projects on their own or in collaboration with others, which bring together original combinations of media forms. 
    6.	Capacity for innovation: They have developed flexible work practices that can be employed in a wide variety of production contexts and have the technical conceptual skills for dealing with new forms and unforeseen challenges. 
    7.	Critical reflection and awareness of context: They can critically reflect on relevant issues related to a larger social context and make informed decisions about the positioning of their work and methods of production. This critical reflection should be expressed through both practice, and verbal analysis of intention: reflections on process and creative output. 
    8.	Communication skills: They can communicate their intention, context, process and perceived results– with clear written and oral descriptions to both experts and general audiences.