User:Tomas Navarro

Thesis 25/03/2012 TRUE HOLOGRAM Research working title: z-buffering, an informal inventory of avant-garde imaginery of 20 and 21 century.

intro

Z-buffer is an extra layer of a photographic image that contains a precise map of the three dimensional geometry of the scene. Is exactly what human stereopsis/binocular vision does. This document is driven by the research process of obtaining a true hologram, which we can widely defined as a 3D representation in photographic form.

expanded index

1. Photographic aesthetics

2. Holograms

3. Z-buffering, metadata and tracking.

4. Concept design of lens-based hologram

5. 360; Ubiquity

6. Test 1

'7. Communication and data

8. Videogames emulating cinema // cinema emulating videogames and back again. machinima.

9. New narratives: googling, fakes, viral, cross-media,''

LBDM reserach project

LBDM artwork research

The process that guides the thesis is my camera work investigation, focused this year in the possibility of create a 360 hologram to be projected in a smoke saturated medium.

Through the highlights of the research I’ll link the index above mentioned and therefore establish a sequential process that mix technological outcomes with aesthetics and personal motivation.

The hologram experiment is therefore a touchstone that gathers these concepts of modern videography:

1. 360 degrees view.

2. Z-buffering.

3. Metadata (Multi-layered data).

4. New screening devices.

5. 3d features (stereoscopy, stereograms).

6. Optical challenges and new devices.

7. Freeze frame, bullet time, frozen time.

8. Augmented reality.

9. Sampling.

PHOTOGRAPHIC AESTHETICS

The adjective photographic implies a realistic approach to imaginery. However the adjective photographic is understood in this document as any tool that can realistically record coordinates and reconstruct a projection of our world, which doesn’t necessarily means that we can recognize the empiric appearance of our world on those projections. Due to the shape I want to give to this thesis I’d like to define and expand the proper terminology of it. Photography is commonly strictly referred to the specific lenses technology, I’d like to spread it to the correlative eye-subject-memory axis of communication, which is the self-statement of the medium.

We accept the photorealism of the lenses devices as the true testimony of our environment; the core of the photographic medium is the social contract within itself, constantly reshaping and feed-backing our perception as a mirror. Photography is therefore any outcome that faithfully records and projects the 4 dimensions of a specific moment, subject, from a specific point of view, which defines the intention, author, audience and back again.

New approaches to reality depiction has been massively accepted, that means that our images inventory is nowadays embracing the digital era features. The above-mentioned social contract is now familiar with new keywords on images processing and new ways of data recording and visualization. The new interactive channel of broadcasting is gathering a new collection of visualization tools that will inevitably transcend our understanding of visual media.

As visual media developer I’d like to distinguish between two states of the whole visual phenomena. On one hand we have the intellectual approach to images; we use visual data for the unique purpose of mirror our concerns, both individually and socially. The mental state of visual phenomena is therefore the content of those images; the compromise with the medium will be defined by the self-statement of each person: an artist will actively interact with the medium, an ordinary citizen will use it for personal communication in a passive way. Consequently we can define two levels on images projection: the “realistic”, ordinary people visual culture, and the “post-realistic”, which is the possibility of operate from inside the channel of communication and transcend it.

Nevertheless the “post-realistic” outcomes always try to legitimize themselves in order to be accepted as part of the “realistic” amalgam. For example, a visionary or futuristic image needs to be legitimized as realistically possible; if it leaves the social contract agreed content it automatically becomes non legible and meaningless. In that sense we can deduce an immutability state of outcomes as we need to be anchored in a specific space of ideas that could changes form but not content.

On the other hand we must deal with the physic state of visual phenomena. The human being perceives and conceives images based on the inherent stereopsis; all the images that depicts reality for others eyes could be consequently analyzed as optical phenomena as a lens mechanism is always involved in the process and the final outcomes will be perceived through our binocular vision.

Technology brings a new platform of photographic lecture in which the physic states are being amplified through the incorporation of electronic achievements in society intellectia; we can define it as “transversal imaginery” as it extends across the length of the medium in cross direction, multi-disciplinarly interacting with different features.

Z-buffering is my own keyword to define the coordinates of transversal imaginery’s aesthetics, in which photography and stereopsis are being augmented and “realistically” accepted in unexpected outcomes.

HOLOGRAMS

Widely defined by futuristic movies the true holographic medium is still a sacred place for imaginary communication systems. The true holographic medium, the “realistic” and legitimized hologram, is the one which projects a 3d object floating in the space, can be surrounded, can be touched and not is based on “after images” brain perception. Even if the last outcomes fully depicts a photorealistic 3d projections they cannot be touched; conceptually implies that they are caught in a certain ether or non-natural substance, therefore their presence cannot take place plenty in our dimensional coordinates.

In a sensitive level the best performance in holography is the parabolic mirror ghost, in which all the focal points converges from a form’s reflection, therefore the 3d projection needs the presence of the physical subject. The presence of the object is precise enough to trick the mind and believe in the veracity of the 3d projection.

The physics of the holographic outcomes will help us in establish a quick catalogue of achievements. Holography is the process by which we could record the volume of any subject and then reproduce a 3D photographic representation of it. For many years the medium faced the unavoidable flat medium of screening; the volumetric images were formally a “multilayered photography”, a flat screen able to show different angles of an image.

Conceptually and not depending of the source and projection device (laser, parallax barrier, lenticular vision, stereograms) the flat medium is still today the holographic 3D territory; the hologram itself is inevitably an illusion of parallax. Apparently we can establish a common ground of all these disciplines: the source is inherently linked to the binocular vision, parallax is the key for a complete 3d experience as replica of our vision system . Curiously the stereoscopy as discipline is almost old as photography; the digital era lights up the fire.