User:Tisa/special issue 10
Session #1 [17-9-2019]:
Thinking ahead: Possibilities of the project:
- different aspects: synthesizer itself, the cover - thus interface, connectivity to the other modules - interrelationality
- software, hardware and the usage -> in practice and in thought.
- connecting modules augments the possibilites - modularity = great affordance
«««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
MY NOISE MACHINERY
In the meanwhile I went to Groningen and brought back all my diy sound machines, half of them are broken a bit. Bought a 2,5€ microphone with a mini jack in Action, but apparently it doesn't work. I will probably disassemble it, see what's inside, if anything at all. Maybe just a sheel, a sad shell without any sound in it, not even the waves. Eirik bought this dx-26 mixer for 5€ in Mamamini. Should I get it from him?
Also: My other noise machines are not really compatible with the module, only the bug is (but it's very high pitched and I don't like it.) (i want to have some machine that would make granular sound-wall, white noise). The 4-legged machine only has two legs - potentiometers -> fix it.
The plan is to make my performances more real-time, more based on improvisation, echoing all the knowledge about it that I have configurated in the past year and longer - through my first-hand experiences with it (through theater, playing instruments, vocal improvisation, free-writing etc.)
To perform in the material reality of the temporal-spatial setting of this (annoying) performative time. write about it #todo
«««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
Session #2 workshop with Olli Aarni
FIRST DAY [23-9-2019]
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/olliworkshop
My thoughts: The difficulties of describing sound. (Remember, the workshop w/Dré? -> getting meta) What are the parameters? VOCABULARY? How poetic can/could/should one be? Imagination when re-constructing a sound from language. Mind modulation.
Limitations, frameworks can be -> are beautiful. For example the 5 strings on the finish Kantele or the Etiopian Begena. How can the "vocabulary" expand, from simple words to complex sentences.
Exercise: Fictional designs, interfaces for the principle of string instruments. For example a harp in a tall staircase, strings being fixed on top and the bottom, played while ascending-descending. A giant that plays the bridge.
Buzzing against mosquitoes. Buzzing against young people.
Active listening - Pauline Oliveros
When listening - isolating sources of sound from one another. Specific - general sound. Being aware of the sound that we are producing? Hamburg trainstation - soundscape.
Negative-positive-neutral sound perception?
Snow playing on citre. or rain Drops of water in a cave. [ https://naturebliss.bandcamp.com/album/ochiruchirumichiru-kk034 beautifully randomised] Birds playing on guitars. Celeste Boursier-Mougenot
Randomness (lava lamp) generator.
Interfaces of language: spoken | symbolic | written
Where is the limit between language and music? Language and poetry?
What are the relevant questions here?
Pesniške figure -> research more.
Exercise: Describe a sound (from a 20-minute walk around the block), without referencing to its source.
"Shortly continuous, a swipe, a one time non-repeatable gesture, soft, mid + high spectrum, (a surprise under the feet), a memory of a complex unisono, in silence loudly perceived." -> krhkojemajoč, a leaf cracking under feet.
"Round and metalic, not intentional, broken in two repetitions, the second one prolonged, louder than the space around, when you flinch, loose control, a disruption." tonorijska zdrznitev, a spoon falling somewhere.
Listened to the beautiful Eliane Radigue: Feedback works (1969–1970): feedback with microphones, speakers and reel-to-reel tape machines Adnos III (1979–1980): arp2500 Occam Ocean II (2015): orchestra, oral instructions ->
// a whale on the edge almost crashing down in between skyscrapers, a swarm of wasps approaching from afar .. The extended moment of waiting, refusing to know the outcome that sometimes reveals we do not at all have control. Nauseous morning of stillness. States on the verge of admiration. Simplicities shifting between complex layers //
SECOND DAY [24-9-2019]
Overview of "some" sound terms.
I'm getting somehow annoyed, or shall I say stimulated by the nature of our debates. It's this silence that is painful for a full mind. The discrepancy between thinking and saying. I thought that in this environment people would be inspired and empowered to speak their mind, to invent thoughts and concepts as we go. (Is fear, self-image here the preventing factor?) Preconceived knowledge or ideas here as not as important as is the real-time process, an open collective workflow. Nobody has to apologize for the lack of their knowledge, come on. I guess I was mistaking and I'm going to be (again) in this ungrateful position of always having to say something but holding myself back in order not to override this (unproductive) group dynamic. I'm being cruel here. But this situation in itself is cruel to me.
Highlights:
Needing a reference to describe a sound - a question of approach and the logic of perception: do we want to speak about sound in a poetic or scientific way? In what way for what purpose? It is almost a question of metaphors (#todo add my "A plea for metaphors" text)
Exercise 1: 1) Listen to the sound & name the file with one word (attach it to the original name). 2) Listen to the sounds, try to find connections between them, link them together in folders (at least 3 categories), name the folders so that they describe their content. 3) Create a text file in a folder where you explain why they are similar/grouped together.
Exercise 2: Listen to the soundfiles and place them in categories you've created during the previous exercise. If they don't fit different categories perfectly, find one that's closest. You can place the sounds in the category folders or attach the names of the categories to their filenames. -> funny, most of them just fit into the category named "all around the place" - is it noise, or what?!
How would it be possible to make an overview, a statistic of the overlapping categories of all of us (very different approaches, mostly not connected to the definitions of words related to sound that we have started defining in the morning)? -> WORDS on the pad #todo construct a stable dictionary.
And again this question appears - in what way to describe? Ficitional, story-like, imaginative or generally valid PARAMETERS, theoretical. Is it a question of basic knowledge, vocabulary? Intent of the writing? How would you write an article/a report from a concert, a poem, a text msg for a friend, naming a sound file? So, is it intended to clearly represent the parameters or to augment the hearable? Who can hear it, who doesn't (along with reading). It's a question of abstract or concrete worlds colliding? Where is this line between the birocratic and the poetic language? They are always OVERLAPPING. How to handle this while trying to combine them into a system, a cathegorisation?
Metaphorically I can think of this matter by the analogy of a lightning bolt. Imagine, it strucks a tree, a primal human observing it catching fire. He finds the explanation of it in the abstract, imaginatory, a diety, a god is created, blamed for the magnificent phenomenon of fire. Moving up on the slider of time, humanity is faced with science. And then at some point we have Tesla that begins to understand the lightning and use it in other ways. The god here is just a memory of the mysteriousness. - - - Where are we, right now, on this time slider? Do we satisfy ourselves with the existence of god and mystery, or do we make an effort to step out of the comfort zones of divine abstraction, imagination and synchronize with contemporaneity that possesses scientifically proven and discovered phenomenon? Or a better direction of this thought is - how to combine the two - in order to understand reality. Here, I am speaking about a similar binary as the rational:sensory. Again this question of the relation between poetry and theory. How to think, to speak, to write about occurences? It is not a question of choosing in between the two "protocols". It is a question of HOW to approach the matter all together. Maybe just letting yourself exit the realm of the academic and confront concepts differently.
THIRD DAY [25-9-2019]
define cacophony: A harsh discordant mixture of sounds.
Making a playlist - each one of us, sharing what the core of sound is. Also the sound works/pieces that we've done.
Peter was expaining - Tetragamacilculaire by De Player, a publication without a strict format. "the anti record" Check out the previous publication TGC #3 here.
- Play this pattern #todo pending project (collect the material, choose the collaborators, write about it)
Check out: Nam Jun Paik #todo
RADAR radio show at Radio Student (first week of October) - a mashup reportage from Dutch modular fest, (merged with Sonica festival Ljubljana ?)
Exercise - find various sounds from the objects brought: short, quiet, long, texturalised, The ping pong ball is the meta example for all the phenomenon of sound.
-ASMR, foley.
Exercise - use the categories from yesterday as an inspiration, make a score for the objects, sketch the sound, write down a notation, perform it. #todo add the photo of the notation + the sound recording. «««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» THE LOVESTORY «««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
I'm thinking on how to adapt or confront.
My field is not the Terminal, it is Command prompt.
All instructions are for mac OS.
Windows has not provided me with a nice view.
«««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
In half-sleep watched this [19-9-2019]
«««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
Dennis suggests [20-9-2019]:
- installing https://www.cygwin.com/
- Depending on the Windows version you could either try [[1]] > (> win 10).
-You could use the PZI raspberry pi prolly -or use a linux 'live image' on bootable USB stick to boot into linux without hurting windows.
«««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
So, my decision [22-9-2019] seems to be to install Linux on a USB and run it.
So, what happens [23-9-2019] is that the Linux live (the non - stable one or how do you call this anyways?) makes the screen shiver, tilting it in randomized horizontal-vertical positions, surprisin, provoking a call of momentarity, a glimpse of a shock. It is said that this version of it does not remember, every installation would have to be made anew each time when running it. How is it like to not possess any memory? //So, can I empathize with a machine yet?//
When trying to upload my "ican" sound sample taken from this track the Arduino board and the Arduino nano ran on the linux do not communicate properly. After one burned board (by the accidentally distructive code from Dennis - she counts, gets too fast, disrupts the flow of information), then miraculously (another machine, another arduino) the sample gets uploaded. It sounds pretty jolly. Annoying after further tryouts at home.