User:Ssstephen/prototype/20231002

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
< User:Ssstephen
Revision as of 13:18, 2 October 2023 by Ssstephen (talk | contribs) (Created page with "As well as making connections I want to examine ones that are already there, and examine my own practices as they exists generally. Simultaneous and consecutive interpreting: what are you doing here stephen? Documenting old and new things that I am doing and how they connect. What does it mean to perform? <pre>per- word-forming element common in words of French and Latin origin, meaning primarily "through," thus also "throughout; thoroughly; entirely, utterly," from...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

As well as making connections I want to examine ones that are already there, and examine my own practices as they exists generally.

Simultaneous and consecutive interpreting: what are you doing here stephen? Documenting old and new things that I am doing and how they connect.

What does it mean to perform?

per- 
word-forming element common in words of French and Latin origin, meaning primarily "through," thus also "throughout; thoroughly; entirely, utterly," from Latin preposition per (see per (prep)).
The verb was used with wider senses in Middle English than now, including "to make, construct; produce, bring about;" also "come true" (of dreams), and to performen muche time was "to live long." Related: Performed; performing; performable.

How can a performance be open in the same way as an object can, to refuse to be finished?

Is switching to linux a performance? who are the audience? where is the performance happening, how is it being documented?

I have an email from a freelance client so I will switch to a different thread. I read the email in a specific mode because I know if contains a direction to be followed. They would like an edit to be made to a date in a document I created. It is a simple line edit so I decide to make the change now, rather than add it to the to-do list. I open Adobe InDesign 2022 now as it takes a few moments to load. I'm still using 2022 because I know it is very stable and my files open on it correctly. At the moment I dont have time to use the 2023 version, although I also have that installed on my HP Windows laptop.

I find the indd file to be edited. I keep the files organised: one directory per client, within this one directory per job, within this versioned files so I have backups. I open the latest version of this file. Oops I opened it in 2023 InDesign. Try again. I got distracted talking to Aglaia but it was loading anyway. But it takes me a second to focus again.

I use InDesign's "Find/Change" palette to locate the page of the document. I type "resources reque", no need for the full title of the page. I press Alt+Tab to switch between my email, InDesign, and of course this tab to write these notes. I triple check that I am making the correct edit, and that it does indeed only need to be changed in one place. Better to confirm now than have to edit again. I check one extra time because this annotation process is distracting me.

When I am sure, I save the file (not a new version as this was a minor edit) and I export a new pdf. The pdf's are both dated and given a letter to show which version of the file it is. This one is version E. I use keyboard shortcuts throughout this process, to find, to save, to export, to open the directory, to switch tabs. I save the file one more time (why?) and close InDesign.

I quickly write a response to the email and attach the file.

No problem *****, attached here.

Thanks,
Stephen

In total the process took about fifteen minutes, including this documentation. Without the documentation maybe 3-4 minutes.