User:Simon/Reading, Writing & Research Methodologies SI9: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==IFL introductions==
==IFL introductions==
[[User:Simon/Profiling_shadow_libraries|Profiling shadow libraries: aaaaarg.fail, ubuweb & Project Gutenberg]]
[[User:Simon/Profiling_shadow_libraries|Profiling shadow libraries: aaaaarg.fail, ubuweb & Project Gutenberg]]
==Annotations==
How can annotation be useful to us, and a third party?
Possible ways:
    Keep text and annotations together
    - scan and overlay transparencies (more like a graphical representation but perhaps not very readable)
    - write, re-write, cut and paste the annotations in a bigger paper all together
    - use the annotation bot (a digital tool)(it would be cool if you could underline, etc - yes! including graphic elements)
    - if digital, create the  possibility to turn on and off the annotations to keep the original text
    - bind the pages into books and make a bootleg library with them
    Separate text and annotations (deconstruction / structure analysis)
    - only underlined text (in many ways: lines, circles, waves...)
    - list of questions, tags, notes + composition and mapping of them (different mapping techniques)
    - historical timeline
    - only drawings?
    - free graphical interpretation
    Computer driven annotation
    - scrape the text (words processing)
    - pattern recognition
    - delete all articles and implicit elements
    Combine the above possibilities
    - overlay of analog annotations to represent "heat patterns" (parts of the text with lots of/little engagement), as well as a digital version that is more legible
    HOW DO I KNOW WHAT I AM READING? We are discussing form how do we talk about content?
    How do you make the content readable for others?
    How do you communicate what you're interpreting?

Revision as of 11:25, 9 July 2019

IFL introductions

Profiling shadow libraries: aaaaarg.fail, ubuweb & Project Gutenberg

Annotations

How can annotation be useful to us, and a third party?

Possible ways:

   Keep text and annotations together
   - scan and overlay transparencies (more like a graphical representation but perhaps not very readable)
   - write, re-write, cut and paste the annotations in a bigger paper all together
   - use the annotation bot (a digital tool)(it would be cool if you could underline, etc - yes! including graphic elements)
   - if digital, create the  possibility to turn on and off the annotations to keep the original text
   - bind the pages into books and make a bootleg library with them


   Separate text and annotations (deconstruction / structure analysis)
   - only underlined text (in many ways: lines, circles, waves...)
   - list of questions, tags, notes + composition and mapping of them (different mapping techniques)
   - historical timeline
   - only drawings?
   - free graphical interpretation


   Computer driven annotation
   - scrape the text (words processing)
   - pattern recognition
   - delete all articles and implicit elements


   Combine the above possibilities
   - overlay of analog annotations to represent "heat patterns" (parts of the text with lots of/little engagement), as well as a digital version that is more legible


   HOW DO I KNOW WHAT I AM READING? We are discussing form how do we talk about content? 
   How do you make the content readable for others?
   How do you communicate what you're interpreting?