User:Simon/Annotation typologies: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Typologies identified from a previous project, which explored "marks of use" in books from a section of the State Library of Victoria.
==traces of book use in ''from the books''==
Typologies of traces of use identified from a previous project called ''From the Books: SLV RBRR 000-099'', which explored books from the 000-099 section of the Redmond Barry Reading Room in the State Library of Victoria.


http://simonbrowne.biz/projects/from-the-books-slv-rbrr-000-099/
* ACCIDENTAL DOG-EAR
 
* ANNOTATION  
ACCIDENTAL DOG-EAR<br>
* ASTERISK  
ANNOTATION<br>
* BOOK PRICE  
ASTERISK<br>
* BOOKMARK  
BOOK PRICE<br>
* CIRCLED TEXT  
BOOKMARK<br>
* CREASED PAGE  
CIRCLED TEXT<br>
* CROSS  
CREASED PAGE<br>
* DEAD ANT  
CROSS<br>
* DOG-EAR  
DEAD ANT<br>
* ERASER RUBBING  
DOG-EAR<br>
* ERRATA  
ERASER RUBBING<br>
* FINGERPRINT  
ERRATA<br>
* FOLD  
FINGERPRINT<br>           
* HANDWRITTEN LETTER  
FOLD<br>
* INK BLOT  
HANDWRITTEN LETTER<br>
* LIBRARY DOCUMENT  
INK BLOT<br>
* LIFTED PRINT  
LIBRARY DOCUMENT<br>
* LINE  
LIFTED PRINT<br>
* LOOSE PAGE  
LINE<br>
* NOTEPAPER BOOKMARK  
LOOSE PAGE<br>
* NOTES  
NOTEPAPER BOOKMARK<br>
* PAGES REMOVED  
NOTES<br>
* POST-IT NOTE  
PAGES REMOVED<br>
* RECEIPT BOOKMARK  
POST-IT NOTE<br>
* REPLACED IMAGE  
RECEIPT BOOKMARK<br>
* SCUFF  
REPLACED IMAGE<br>
* SMUDGE  
SCUFF<br>
* SQUIGGLE  
SMUDGE<br>
* STAIN  
SQUIGGLE<br>
* STRIKETHROUGH  
STAIN<br>
* TICK  
STRIKETHROUGH<br>
* TORN PAGE  
TICK<br>
* TORN PAPER BOOKMARK  
TORN PAGE<br>
* UNDERLINING  
TORN PAPER BOOKMARK<br>
* WARPED PAGE  
UNDERLINING<br>
* WEAR AND TEAR<br>
WARPED PAGE<br>
WEAR AND TEAR<br>


These formed a loose classification system that indexed these books not by bibliographic reference, but by the frequency of occurrence, taking a "bag of words" approach.
These formed a loose classification system that indexed these books not by bibliographic reference, but by the frequency of occurrence, taking a "bag of words" approach.
Line 45: Line 44:


==thoughts and reflections==
==thoughts and reflections==
Whereas my previous approach was one of identification based on nouns, which presented problems. In a sense, to name something is to own it. Things become property much more easily than actions. Perhaps a different approach of identifying actions may be more open and associative than a noun-based classification scheme.
My approach was one of identification based on nouns, which presented problems in describing the traces we found and the possible intention (or lack of intention) in their making. To what extent could the noun communicate what had happened? Nouns point towards things affected by actions. In a sense, to name something is to own it, and things become property much more easily than actions.

Latest revision as of 22:39, 5 July 2020

traces of book use in from the books

Typologies of traces of use identified from a previous project called From the Books: SLV RBRR 000-099, which explored books from the 000-099 section of the Redmond Barry Reading Room in the State Library of Victoria.

  • ACCIDENTAL DOG-EAR
  • ANNOTATION
  • ASTERISK
  • BOOK PRICE
  • BOOKMARK
  • CIRCLED TEXT
  • CREASED PAGE
  • CROSS
  • DEAD ANT
  • DOG-EAR
  • ERASER RUBBING
  • ERRATA
  • FINGERPRINT
  • FOLD
  • HANDWRITTEN LETTER
  • INK BLOT
  • LIBRARY DOCUMENT
  • LIFTED PRINT
  • LINE
  • LOOSE PAGE
  • NOTEPAPER BOOKMARK
  • NOTES
  • PAGES REMOVED
  • POST-IT NOTE
  • RECEIPT BOOKMARK
  • REPLACED IMAGE
  • SCUFF
  • SMUDGE
  • SQUIGGLE
  • STAIN
  • STRIKETHROUGH
  • TICK
  • TORN PAGE
  • TORN PAPER BOOKMARK
  • UNDERLINING
  • WARPED PAGE
  • WEAR AND TEAR

These formed a loose classification system that indexed these books not by bibliographic reference, but by the frequency of occurrence, taking a "bag of words" approach. Problems that arose were linguistic - it was difficult assigning a word to an example as this already had some assumption of intention (e.g. a doodle as an intentional drawing vs squiggle as unintentional drawing).

thoughts and reflections

My approach was one of identification based on nouns, which presented problems in describing the traces we found and the possible intention (or lack of intention) in their making. To what extent could the noun communicate what had happened? Nouns point towards things affected by actions. In a sense, to name something is to own it, and things become property much more easily than actions.