User:Simon/Annotation typologies: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
http://simonbrowne.biz/projects/from-the-books-slv-rbrr-000-099/ | http://simonbrowne.biz/projects/from-the-books-slv-rbrr-000-099/ | ||
ACCIDENTAL DOG-EAR | ACCIDENTAL DOG-EAR | | ||
ANNOTATION | | |||
ANNOTATION | ASTERISK | | ||
ASTERISK | |||
BOOK PRICE<br> | BOOK PRICE<br> | ||
BOOKMARK<br> | BOOKMARK<br> | ||
CIRCLED TEXT<br> | CIRCLED TEXT<br> | ||
CREASED PAGE<br> | CREASED PAGE<br> | ||
CROSS<br> | CROSS<br> | ||
DEAD ANT<br> | DEAD ANT<br> | ||
DOG-EAR<br> | DOG-EAR<br> | ||
ERASER RUBBING<br> | ERASER RUBBING<br> | ||
ERRATA<br> | ERRATA<br> | ||
FINGERPRINT<br> | FINGERPRINT<br> | ||
FOLD<br> | FOLD<br> | ||
HANDWRITTEN LETTER<br> | HANDWRITTEN LETTER<br> | ||
INK BLOT<br> | INK BLOT<br> | ||
LIBRARY DOCUMENT<br> | LIBRARY DOCUMENT<br> | ||
LIFTED PRINT<br> | LIFTED PRINT<br> | ||
LINE<br> | LINE<br> | ||
LOOSE PAGE<br> | LOOSE PAGE<br> | ||
NOTEPAPER BOOKMARK<br> | NOTEPAPER BOOKMARK<br> | ||
NOTES<br> | NOTES<br> | ||
PAGES REMOVED<br> | PAGES REMOVED<br> | ||
POST-IT NOTE<br> | POST-IT NOTE<br> | ||
RECEIPT BOOKMARK<br> | RECEIPT BOOKMARK<br> | ||
REPLACED IMAGE<br> | REPLACED IMAGE<br> | ||
SCUFF<br> | SCUFF<br> | ||
SMUDGE<br> | SMUDGE<br> | ||
SQUIGGLE<br> | SQUIGGLE<br> | ||
STAIN<br> | STAIN<br> | ||
STRIKETHROUGH<br> | STRIKETHROUGH<br> | ||
TICK<br> | TICK<br> | ||
TORN PAGE<br> | TORN PAGE<br> | ||
TORN PAPER BOOKMARK<br> | TORN PAPER BOOKMARK<br> | ||
UNDERLINING<br> | UNDERLINING<br> | ||
WARPED PAGE<br> | WARPED PAGE<br> | ||
WEAR AND TEAR<br> | WEAR AND TEAR<br> | ||
These formed a loose classification system that indexed these books not by bibliographic reference, but by the frequency of occurrence, taking a "bag of words" approach. | These formed a loose classification system that indexed these books not by bibliographic reference, but by the frequency of occurrence, taking a "bag of words" approach. | ||
Problems that arose were linguistic - it was difficult assigning a word to an example as this already had some assumption of intention (e.g. a doodle as an intentional drawing vs squiggle as unintentional drawing). | Problems that arose were linguistic - it was difficult assigning a word to an example as this already had some assumption of intention (e.g. a doodle as an intentional drawing vs squiggle as unintentional drawing). | ||
Revision as of 11:03, 1 June 2019
Typologies identified from a previous project, which explored "marks of use" in books from a section of the State Library of Victoria.
http://simonbrowne.biz/projects/from-the-books-slv-rbrr-000-099/
ACCIDENTAL DOG-EAR | ANNOTATION | ASTERISK |
BOOK PRICE
BOOKMARK
CIRCLED TEXT
CREASED PAGE
CROSS
DEAD ANT
DOG-EAR
ERASER RUBBING
ERRATA
FINGERPRINT
FOLD
HANDWRITTEN LETTER
INK BLOT
LIBRARY DOCUMENT
LIFTED PRINT
LINE
LOOSE PAGE
NOTEPAPER BOOKMARK
NOTES
PAGES REMOVED
POST-IT NOTE
RECEIPT BOOKMARK
REPLACED IMAGE
SCUFF
SMUDGE
SQUIGGLE
STAIN
STRIKETHROUGH
TICK
TORN PAGE
TORN PAPER BOOKMARK
UNDERLINING
WARPED PAGE
WEAR AND TEAR
These formed a loose classification system that indexed these books not by bibliographic reference, but by the frequency of occurrence, taking a "bag of words" approach.
Problems that arose were linguistic - it was difficult assigning a word to an example as this already had some assumption of intention (e.g. a doodle as an intentional drawing vs squiggle as unintentional drawing).
thoughts and reflections
Whereas my previous approach was one of identification based on nouns, which presented problems. In a sense, to name something is to own it. Things become property much more easily than actions. Perhaps a different approach of identifying actions may be more open and associative than a noun-based classification scheme.