User:Nadiners/ unpublishing

Project Proposal

for 24th Nov

What do you want to make?

I propose to bring into existence the: Unpublishing house. (<--- see link here!!)

It will be a space for discussion, but can also resemble in some parts an enterprise for the structure of it. Following the strict definition of this this new verb, I will deal with digital content that must have been published in the first place, that had then been unpublished. By talking about the 'unpublished content' I am in fact republishing or reviving what was intended to be buried and forgotten. The website will be a place for my research to go in, but also record the actions and events I will do out side of it.

Title questions for thesis that should also answer questions and explain project!

• Who is in power to unpublish digital content?

Coders-of-the-world-unite-can-silicon-valley-workers-curb-the-power-of-big-tech-podcast

• To what extent can digital content be unpublished ?

Guardian Edward Snowden

• Unpublishing digital content : Where is the line drawn between censorship and a human right?

INC - the ends of the internet

• Whose reputation is saved/ is at stake when unpublishing?

The trouble with unpublishing the news

• What are the consequences of unpublishing?
• How does unpublishing digital content affect the very own content that has been unpublished? (meta stuff)

The Streisand Effect

The content – two main opposing issues

1. Human rights: An individual wanting to unpublish their own work has become a basic human right (the right to be forgotten implemented in the EU), because we create so much content constantly thoughtlessly we should have the right to regret it, but there is also content about ourselves that we are mostly unaware of that should never have been published in the first place. Self quantification. Self publishing. Overproduction. Mass consumption.
2. Censorship: When large coorporations and states 'unpublish' anything from an individual's content, to another cooporation or state, the matter becomes troublesome. If they publish something in the first place it is because there was a reason, going back on it is censorship.

When does something become censored, when is something a human right? Who decides on the rules?

How do you plan to make it?

I plan to structure the website, which will simultaneously structure my thoughts. Inside the pages there are plans for events, interactions with the public. Preparation for these interactions be my second step. Then I will propose to realise them (discussion with Karin; printroom).

Everytime I hear of an event on the news of someone commiting an unpulishing act, they will become part of the team:

• anonymous unpublishers
• robot.txt unpublisher (employee of the month!)
• nipple unpublisher
• trump's twitter unpublisher
• DRM unpublisher
• scientologist unpublishers
• government unpublishers
• army unpublishers
• Snowdens files unpublisher

Why do you want to make it?

I would like to investigate the impact upon the act of unpublishing digital content and its inevitable consequences. The question arises, who is in power? are those who can choose what to unpublish the most powerful leaders of the world? How can one disappearance bring more reactions to life? And who controls the reaction, are they controlled? The decision to create an 'unpubishing house' relates to me personally, indirectly/subconsciously having parents with a publishing house, does make me question why/what/who should/can/will publish. This intrigue, has grown to be more relevant in today's world. Big data, privacy, surveillance, censorship, archibing.. denial... are all topics we discuss often, and we should carry on talking about them, however in my project i'd like to try approach these topics from a different angle!

Relation to previous practice

This thematic comes from a reversal of my previous topics of interest, where I dealt with the revealing or highlighting unpublished or leaked documents. In one project I collected three different documents relating to drone attack, one being the instruction manual, the second a transcript from leaked audio files of pilots talking during an attack in Afghanistan, and the third was a list of the resulting number of deaths from each attack that was recorded. In another project I created a food wiki where I would collect processed factory packed foods and divide the information found on the packing (on the surface) to information about the corporation (under the surface) in order to make it easier for consumers to know what is in and where their products come from, at the same time revealing the industries secrets.

Relation to a larger context

An individual unpublishing his own material is considered to be his right, an organisation or a nation unpublishing someone else’s material can be seen as censoring. A group burning another’s material can lead to murder. (Heinrich Heine "Wherever books are burned, human beings are destined to be burned too.”)

references

• Eva and Franco Matte on content moderation: http://0100101110101101.org/abuse-standards-violations/
• Memory: to remember and forget – http://poeticcomputation.info/chapters/ch.2/
• 404 Before there was something cool here. But now, there is nothing, you just deleted it. – http://chloedesmoineaux.com/rien.html

---

previous stuff

What do you want to make?

I want to open an Unpublishing House, an entreprise that limits the public's access. Make a sort of graveyard, dead content, or dead virtual beings.

To make an unpublishing house I must deal with previously published content, then physically reverse the actions, maybe by removing word by word a text, or images pixel by pixel. Rather than deletion which is an immediate action, I would take the time and effort to remove. This is a reflective action. mention the unsaid, from A to B and back again.

There are 2 main opposing issues:

1. Human rights

An individual wanting to unpublish their own work has become a basic human right (the right to be forgotten implemented in the EU), because we create so much content constantly thoughtlessly we should have the right to regret it, but there is also content about ourselves that we are mostly unaware of that should never have been published in the first place. Self quantification. Self publishing. Overproduction. Mass consumption.

2. Censorship

When large coorporations and states 'unpublish' anything from an individual's content, to another cooporation or state, the matter becomes troublesome. If they publish something in the first place it is because there was a reason, going back on it is censorship.

I would like to begin researching this topic through visual traces of unpublished material, meaning things that have been published but then removed from the public sphere. An example would be traces of a torn down poster, or a website leaving a text saying “this post has been removed”. In parallel to making a collection of visual ‘proof’ I will research unpublishing in history, examples that only have written traces, or remain in the collective memory.

How do you plan to make it?

Begin with a Hackpact, so one small production a day. This will clarify my intentions and ideas. I will need to plan the structure of the business, from mission statement/manifesto to graphic identity, content and audience. business plan. money..

Publish the 'hackpact' with tor.. finding out how to publish anonymously

What is your timetable?

Why do you want to make it?

I would like to investigate the impact upon the act of unpublishing a certain content, having so many different perspectives on the matter will bring up lots of conclusions. I am interested to see the different reactions one disappearance could bring to life!

Who can help you and how?

I would like to talk to people or interview them, to get a better idea of what the "service" could provide, what would they like to unpublish?

Richard with his stalky story

Use Karin from Printroom

Relation to previous practice

This thematic comes from a reversal of my previous topics of interest, where I dealt with the revealing or highlighting unpublished or leaked documents. In one project I collected three different documents relating to drone attack, one being the instruction manual, the second a transcript from leaked audio files of pilots talking during an attack in Afghanistan, and the third was a list of the resulting number of deaths from each attack that was recorded. In another project I created a food wiki where I would collect processed factory packed foods and divide the information found on the packing (on the surface) to information about the corporation (under the surface) in order to make it easier for consumers to know what is in and where their products come from, at the same time revealing the industries secrets.

Relation to a larger context

An individual unpublishing his own material is considered to be his right, an organisation or a nation unpublishing someone else’s material can be seen as censoring. A group burning another’s material can lead to murder. (Heinrich Heine "Wherever books are burned, human beings are destined to be burned too.”)

references

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/04/the-trouble-with-unpublishing-the-news/390282/

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/08/28/the-fight-over-free-speech-online?mbid=social_facebook

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/20/facebook-rohingya-muslims-myanmar

https://www.andfestival.org.uk/events/online-launch-how-to-appear-offline-forever-sebastian-schmieg/

-Destruction of the Library of Alexandria (only written traces)

-Isis destroy ancient monuments Palmyra ? unpublishing an entire culture

-Nazi book burning (photographic traces)

-The right to be forgotten

-suicide machine (art)

- static glow Audrey