User:Nadiners/ Thesis draft: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
Line 11: Line 11:


Before entering the topic I'd like to introduce the DIKW classification model which represents the relationships between the follwing:  
Before entering the topic I'd like to introduce the DIKW classification model which represents the relationships between the follwing:  
* Data
* Data :
* Information  
* Information  
* knowledge
* knowledge
Line 17: Line 17:
Typically information is defined in terms of data, knowledge in terms of information, and wisdom in terms of knowledge
Typically information is defined in terms of data, knowledge in terms of information, and wisdom in terms of knowledge


To Publish: is to make knowledge public. Public comes from the latin 'populus' from latin meaning 'people', so to publish is to give knowledge to people.


If we agree on these definitions, then data, the raw segments, that are available to the public are not considered as publishing.


</div>
</div>

Revision as of 20:16, 30 January 2018

The Nature of information is impossible to Unpublish

Read this to begin: Overdue Account

Data, from 'Datum' in latin meaning 'something given'. Data constantly gives, but how do you give data back? I found that David Thorne's email thread with Jane, illustrate the essence of digital information. Once data is created it can only disseminate, the very idea of receiving your data back is absurd.

Before entering the topic I'd like to introduce the DIKW classification model which represents the relationships between the follwing:

  • Data :
  • Information
  • knowledge
  • Wisdom

Typically information is defined in terms of data, knowledge in terms of information, and wisdom in terms of knowledge

To Publish: is to make knowledge public. Public comes from the latin 'populus' from latin meaning 'people', so to publish is to give knowledge to people.

If we agree on these definitions, then data, the raw segments, that are available to the public are not considered as publishing.