User:Marie Wocher/Thesis Proposal: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The web cheated on me
Like I said in my project proposal, the reason why I want to investigate how we acquire, participate and process knowledge on the web is, because I grew up believing that the web knows everything and that it will change everything. I believed that the web would help me in finding answers to all questions I have. But I start realizing that the knowledge on the Web is very limited and I don't get my questions answered which leads to disappointment. I would like to find out where this promise, that the Web knows everything and will change everything has its origin and from whom I adapted this belief. What where the general expectations of the web , what did the web actually promise? What did we believe concerning the Web in the beginning, how did it change and where are we now? Which promises are fulfilled and which are not fulfilled?


Throughout my time at PZI I want to investigate how we experience knowledge on the web. I am interested in the way users of the Web act in popular structures, such as Wikipedia, Facebook and Google. By means of surveys and Cultural Probes I want to find out how we acquire, participate and process knowledge on the web […]


Why?
My aim is to answer the question Why there is a disillusion of promises from different positions
For my part, I grew up believing that the web knows everything. And that it will change everything. I believed that the web would help me in finding answers to all questions I have. But I start realizing that the knowledge on the Web is very limited and I don't get my questions answered which leads to disappointment. I would like to find out where this promise, that the Web knows everything, has its origin and from whom I adapted this belief.




Why and is there a disillusion of promises?


'''a) ideologists'''


My aim is to answer the question if the web failed (or its promises) from different positions


like Bruno Latour and Michelle Serres who saw the web as this massive opportunity and predict that the web will cause a deep social and educational transformation


a) ideologists
*Manuel Castells - The Theory of the Network Society


like Bruno Latour and Michelle Serres who saw the web as this massive opportunity and predict that the web will cause a deep social and educational transformation
*
Michel Serres -
 

*Jean-Francois Lyotard – The Postmodern Condition




b) technologists


Corry Doctrow
'''b) technologists'''
(?)


1) going back to the very beginning of the idea of the network


c) the market
2) looking to newer 'technologists' like Corry Doctrow who are criticizing the situation with Social Network Sites during the Arab spring for example


the opportunists that where tapping into this idealism and make a product out of it. They use the opportunities of the web to make money out of it
*Charlie Gere - Digital Culture


the question of idealism versus pragmatism
*Richard Barbrook - The California ideology


*Stewart Brand - From Counterculture to Cyberculture




The example of Wikipedia


In 2001 they started with the idea of bringing together the knowledge of the world by inviting everyone to participate. Now the debate is about commercial advertising and legal issues and the disillusionment that Wikipedia is not written by the population at large
'''c) the market'''


the opportunists that where tapping into this idealism and make a product out of it. The market used the opportunities of the web to make money out of it
(idealism versus pragmatism)




Manuel Castells - The Theory of the Network Society



Michel Serres
'''Disillusion of the web by the example of Wikipedia
'''



Jean-Francois Lyotard – The Postmodern Condition
In 2001 they started with the idea of bringing together the knowledge of the world by inviting everyone to participate. Now the debate is about commercial advertising and legal issues and the disillusionment that Wikipedia is not written by the population at large
Why did Wikipedia fail, did it fail?

Revision as of 18:24, 9 January 2013

Like I said in my project proposal, the reason why I want to investigate how we acquire, participate and process knowledge on the web is, because I grew up believing that the web knows everything and that it will change everything. I believed that the web would help me in finding answers to all questions I have. But I start realizing that the knowledge on the Web is very limited and I don't get my questions answered which leads to disappointment. I would like to find out where this promise, that the Web knows everything and will change everything has its origin and from whom I adapted this belief. What where the general expectations of the web , what did the web actually promise? What did we believe concerning the Web in the beginning, how did it change and where are we now? Which promises are fulfilled and which are not fulfilled?


My aim is to answer the question Why there is a disillusion of promises from different positions


a) ideologists


like Bruno Latour and Michelle Serres who saw the web as this massive opportunity and predict that the web will cause a deep social and educational transformation

  • Manuel Castells - The Theory of the Network Society
  • 
Michel Serres -


*Jean-Francois Lyotard – The Postmodern Condition


b) technologists

1) going back to the very beginning of the idea of the network

2) looking to newer 'technologists' like Corry Doctrow who are criticizing the situation with Social Network Sites during the Arab spring for example

  • Charlie Gere - Digital Culture
  • Richard Barbrook - The California ideology
  • Stewart Brand - From Counterculture to Cyberculture


c) the market

the opportunists that where tapping into this idealism and make a product out of it. The market used the opportunities of the web to make money out of it (idealism versus pragmatism)


Disillusion of the web by the example of Wikipedia

In 2001 they started with the idea of bringing together the knowledge of the world by inviting everyone to participate. Now the debate is about commercial advertising and legal issues and the disillusionment that Wikipedia is not written by the population at large Why did Wikipedia fail, did it fail?