User:Joak/rwrm1-joak/description1

description in dyslexic-style

A short manual for a machine for man: what
This description descripes a mobile machine, specially a masturbation machine that is controlled by mind. The user must put on the belt of the machine around his hip and now he can put his penis in the two clamps of the machine. After that it is necessary to put the EEG on the head, to connect the ear-clips to the ears and to connect the EEG-plug in the box of the machine on the belt. Now you can turn on the machine. If the EEG recognized the users brain-activities, it will immediately start with the movement of the fronter clamp. The movement of the machine will get faster, if the user is more concentrated in the use of the machine. There is also available a machine for woman, where the mind controls the vibration-movement of a dildo.
why
The idea of "direct" human/machine symbiosis, gives many people a queasy feeling, at the same time there is always this big naive of faith in technology in daily human/machine interaction. Historical and current concepts of procedure in the brain have always something strange about, how it can be observed discussions in neuroscience or about mindcotrolled whatever-devices. You can go in a future-new-media-(art-)theme-park-museum with their high-end mindreading electroencephalography machines and the guide will tell you the machine reads now every thought. To comment this situation in a bizarre form and with a fascination for the bachelor machine myth, was built this machine. And anywho, satisfaction with the machine with a direct feedbacksituation in the mind/matter construct should be a consideration for a postfuturistische "maybe-vision" of pleasure.

at the moment i am fascinated by descriptions in patent entries. i think that can/should be a good form/style for re/presentation of the project
for example: http://www.google.com/patents/US5845540?printsec=abstract&hl=de#v=onepage&q&f=false http://www.google.com/patents/US20110082333?printsec=abstract&hl=de#v=onepage&q&f=false --Joak 04:07, 26 September 2012 (CEST)