User:FLEM/2.0.0: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
''How might the work sessions be evaluated beyond asking whether the participants enjoyed them? What's at stake for you? When does a notebook "work"? When not?''  
''How might the work sessions be evaluated beyond asking whether the participants enjoyed them? What's at stake for you? When does a notebook "work"? When not?''  


What I would like to answer to this is that there is not a precise method
What I would like to answer to this is that there is not a precise method to evaluate if a notebook works or does not work.


The criteria is does it become evident, or obvious that the form impacts the writing. If yes, this is what I want to achieve.
The criteria is does it become evident, or obvious that the form impacts the writing? If yes, this is what I want to achieve.


My aim is to create consciousness to enable people to go further in the process. This can be evaluated mostly because
My aim is to create consciousness to enable people to go further in the process. This can be evaluated mostly from their reactions, the results of the sessions.


--> use cases that prove my point from my personal use of notebooks.
it's not only me experimenting, but also others.
 
--> use cases that prove my point from my personal use of notebooks and also from others (Erica & Supi) -->include as case studies


''How can you more precisely articulate your own values and concerns in this work?''  
''How can you more precisely articulate your own values and concerns in this work?''  
Line 35: Line 37:
c) I do not only want to rely on my own opinions therefore I decided to invite other perspectives on this topic by organising the CES
c) I do not only want to rely on my own opinions therefore I decided to invite other perspectives on this topic by organising the CES


''What is the form of publishing that you're working toward?''  
''What is the form of publishing that you're working toward?''
 
A toolkit that will present, in different shapes, how to go through the analysis of self and the creation of their own paper notebooks.
 
The Toolkit will present
 
- the thesis, printed on different papers, different sizes, every chapter, or paragraph will be different.
 
- together with the printed part, papers of different type will be included, a cardboard to hold everything together, and other materials to help in the playground (metal rings, threads etc..)
 
- a "10 steps to make your own notebook", an instructional piece to go through different experiments
 
- a set of cards with questions to trigger the imagination
 
- a selection of short fictional stories based on the notebooks participants made during the sessions, and the stories they told me. 


''What are your assumptions around standardization?''  
''What are your assumptions around standardization?''  
Line 50: Line 66:




make templates for sessions
 
make templates for sessions?
 
create a structure to follow what is the process, outcome, theme, materials, questions, inspirations, learning, reflective thoughts..


== 02.02.22 ==
== 02.02.22 ==
Line 60: Line 79:


C) Build a hybrid/digital prototype: an online tool to create and print layouts and customised instructions [the magic modular notebooks kits]. This digital tool will be gathered together with research results and documentation on an online interface.
C) Build a hybrid/digital prototype: an online tool to create and print layouts and customised instructions [the magic modular notebooks kits]. This digital tool will be gathered together with research results and documentation on an online interface.
I understood that the workshops are just one of the methods that I am using

Revision as of 18:13, 2 February 2023

start of XPUB 5th semester documentation period in January 2023.

i decided to start again from here as the past documentation has been submitted already + I need a fresh start as I have not been able to do it in the last 2 months.

18.01.22

It is hard to document the work here at the moment. I do not know how to come back to it. I have been writing in all other platforms.

Today I contacted the locations for possible C.E.S. in the next 2 months. (see pdf)

The plan is to finish by the end of March with 4 sessions, to be able to add the materials from the sessions in the thesis. to see old session's documentation go to: User:FLEM/Analysis of sessions

I am writing the thesis: i am currently working on the context section, that gives an overview of the concept of paper notebook and the relations with the world.

AT the same time, I am planning new exercises for the sessions. I hate that I cannot do the batch upload here so it is a bit hard to document without pictures.

31.01.22

Feedback (things to keep into consideration):

How might the work sessions be evaluated beyond asking whether the participants enjoyed them? What's at stake for you? When does a notebook "work"? When not?

What I would like to answer to this is that there is not a precise method to evaluate if a notebook works or does not work.

The criteria is does it become evident, or obvious that the form impacts the writing? If yes, this is what I want to achieve.

My aim is to create consciousness to enable people to go further in the process. This can be evaluated mostly from their reactions, the results of the sessions.

it's not only me experimenting, but also others.

--> use cases that prove my point from my personal use of notebooks and also from others (Erica & Supi) -->include as case studies

How can you more precisely articulate your own values and concerns in this work?

a) I am concerned that people do not use notebooks with consciousness and do not see the impact this medium can have on their lives

b) with my research i can try to work with the knowledge I am creating and make it accessible to more people

c) I do not only want to rely on my own opinions therefore I decided to invite other perspectives on this topic by organising the CES

What is the form of publishing that you're working toward?

A toolkit that will present, in different shapes, how to go through the analysis of self and the creation of their own paper notebooks.

The Toolkit will present

- the thesis, printed on different papers, different sizes, every chapter, or paragraph will be different.

- together with the printed part, papers of different type will be included, a cardboard to hold everything together, and other materials to help in the playground (metal rings, threads etc..)

- a "10 steps to make your own notebook", an instructional piece to go through different experiments

- a set of cards with questions to trigger the imagination

- a selection of short fictional stories based on the notebooks participants made during the sessions, and the stories they told me.

What are your assumptions around standardization?

The translation of materiality to web publishing could be worked on further.


Talk with Michael on feedbacks -->


Talk with Steve: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/NextStepEm

see joanna drucker performability of materials


make templates for sessions?

create a structure to follow what is the process, outcome, theme, materials, questions, inspirations, learning, reflective thoughts..

02.02.22

I had a bit of a hard time in understanding what to do with the materials i am gathering with thesis and CES, how to frame and publish this in a form that can be accessible to a public. I am going to insert here the options that were part of my project proposal since the beginning and that got left aside while going on:

A) For the project to continue after the end of the series of explorative sessions, I plan to create an instructional piece/text that users could use to go through the analysis of self and the creation of their own tools, in this case notebooks.

B) Create a collection of essays on the outcomes of the sessions and the discoveries of the participants (see thesis outline).

C) Build a hybrid/digital prototype: an online tool to create and print layouts and customised instructions [the magic modular notebooks kits]. This digital tool will be gathered together with research results and documentation on an online interface.


I understood that the workshops are just one of the methods that I am using