User:Emily/RW&RM/Trimester 02/02

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
< User:Emily
Revision as of 00:39, 26 January 2015 by Emily (talk | contribs) (Created page with "why would you do a digital photo book why photo book official / typical in Holland help to get to text/news/events tell story in different way coffee table book specific char...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

why would you do a digital photo book why photo book official / typical in Holland help to get to text/news/events tell story in different way coffee table book specific character of photo book

the experience of going through a book flip the page - different interaction book - linear generate their own book via keyword digital generated book with physical outcome physical manifestation

Anymeric Man; digital information presented in material form Codex archive digital content make a photo book with just metadata

Martin Brink (animated gif) Grass

can a website be a book books: borders

worm last year book greyscalepress.com Chinese Hackers—- data hemmer

p-dpa.net boem sebastianschmieg,com

any books with photos are photo books?

travel book without really travelling with only found images

on the sunset strip by Edward Ruscha

search by image

Agrippa (a book of the dead)

james patteron’s self-destruct after 24 hours

factory records sandpaper


digital book idea: page hyperlink to another (unstable) page keywords as hyperlink once a keywords being clicked then they are deleted

narrative etherpath



I PAGE ONE

A work of art has always been reproduced in order to help practice, diffuse, pursuit of gain etc. Mechanical reproduction of a work of art represents something new. When lithography began to keep pace with printing, it surpassed by photography, the same situation being revealed, when the pictorial reproduction could keep pace with speech, it foreshadowed the sound film. The technical reproduction had reached a standard that not only permitted it to produce all transmitted works of art and thus cause the most profound change in their impact upon the public.

II PAGE TWO
History and authenticity demands for presence of the original, because even the most perfect reproduction of a work of art lacks of its presence in time and space, what’s more, the authenticity of a thing is the essence of all that is transmissible and historical testimony rests on the authenticity. However, technical reproduction is more independent and can make copies out of its own context but enables the original to meet the beholder halfway. Making many reproductions leads to a circle shattering the tradition, within which a plurality of copies substitute for a unique existence by making reproductions, and then it reactivates reproductions after permitting reproduction to meet audiences in its own particular situation. Film is the most representative agent, liquidating of the traditional value of the cultural heritage.

III PAGE THREE
Human sense perception changes by nature and more historical circumstances. Social transformations are expressed by these changes of perception. the aura decays in the contemporary bases. It is revealed in two circumstances, the desire of contemporary masses to bring things closer spatially and humanly; overcoming the uniqueness of every reality by accepting its reproduction.

IV PAGE FOUR
The aura of art works as its uniqueness has its basis in ritual, the location of its original use value. Whereas, art reacted with a theology, it gave rise to pure art.
to be continue