User:Camilo/Thesis Guideline: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=<p style="color:DarkOrange; font-family: Alike Angular; font-weight: bold;"> ⇄. Thesis Outline</p>= | =<p style="color:DarkOrange; font-family: Alike Angular; font-weight: bold;"> ⇄. Thesis Outline</p>= | ||
<div style="font-family: Alike Angular;">__TOC__</div> | <div style="font-family: Alike Angular;">__TOC__</div> | ||
==<p style="color:black; font-family: Alike Angular; font-weight: bold;"> Index </p>== | |||
'''Introduction''' | |||
:'''1. Glossary''' | |||
:: 1.1. Challenging a recurrent element of a publication. | |||
:: 1.2. Possible ontologies and world-building with words. | |||
:'''2. System''' | |||
:: 2.1. The nature of this glossary: The publishing practice as a living open system | |||
:: 2.2. Weaving different realms: an inter-connected world. | |||
:'''3. Experiment''' | |||
:: 3.1. Playing with the system: Threads and weaving. Speculating on possible connections and processes. | |||
:'''4. Manifesto''' | |||
:: 4.1. Manifestos on Publishing practices. | |||
:: 4.2. The manifesto as a tool to reflect and diffract. | |||
:'''5. Conclusion.''' | |||
:'''6. Bibliography.''' | |||
==<p style="color:black; font-family: Alike Angular; font-weight: bold;"> Introduction </p>== | ==<p style="color:black; font-family: Alike Angular; font-weight: bold;"> Introduction </p>== | ||
The purpose of this thesis is to unpack and explore separately each component of the project. | The purpose of this thesis is to unpack and explore separately each component of the project "Glossary for a Diffractive publishing practice". This project is part of a collaborative publishing practice I'm working on with my friend Maria Paris. It is an experimental project that aims to connect multiple vocabularies from different practices of publishing with vocabularies of other realms, in order to reflect and expand the vision of our practice. | ||
The components are the glossary, the system, the experiment, and the manifesto. The glossary component is seen as the matter of the project. It refers to what is the project composed of. The system component is taken as the organization of the project, it explains how the project is organized. The experiment component refers to how the project moves and how it is been activated. The manifesto component is the intention. It refers to what the project aims for. | |||
In the second chapter, I will reflect on the glossary component, by thinking about what is a glossary beyond a list of words, and what are the potentialities of using such a structure for a publication. I will introduce the glossary as the common element inside a publication that creates meaning to a specific world inside a book. I will be looking at the collaborative workshop I made called "Glossary of glossaries" as an attempt to challenge the structure, and I will articulate the ontological capabilities by bringing the idea of world-building from the texts of Ursula K. Le Guin and Tiger Dingsun. | |||
In the third chapter, I will explain the system component, by describing how this system of words looks like and why it suggests seeing the publishing practice as a complex system. I will approach the publishing practice as a living system by recognizing its complexity beyond single descriptions or tags. For that, I will introduce an example of this from the text "soap" by Fabio Morais in which he describes the almost empty tag of saying 'Artist Book' to refer to a publication that is full of complexities. Furthermore, I will expose the interconnected capabilities of the system by describing the ontological inseparability described by Karen Barad and Donna Haraway. This will give me the opportunity to clarify why the link between different realms. | |||
In the fourth chapter, I will attempt to exemplify the experiment component by threading connections among the words by speculating about outcomes and giving examples. I will explain what do I call a thread and how the weaving process can activate an experimental activity that can bring up practices or present already existing projects. | |||
In the first chapter, I will explore the manifesto component of the project by stating the publishing manifesto as a tool to reflect on the practice, but furthermore as a tool for diffraction. I will show some examples of manifestos from the book Publishing Manifestos made by Miss Read. And I will articulate them to expose how by stating a mission for a future publishing practice we are reflecting proactively on the present of it. Afterward, I will introduce the term 'diffraction' to make clear that the approach of questioning the practice goes beyond a reflective attitude. A diffractive approach is going to be explored by the text Diffracting Diffraction by Karen Barad. | |||
==<p style="color:black; font-family: Alike Angular; font-weight: bold;"> Bibliography </p>== | ==<p style="color:black; font-family: Alike Angular; font-weight: bold;"> Bibliography </p>== | ||
| Line 35: | Line 38: | ||
* Intra-actions - Adam Kleinman (Mousee 34 - Karen Barad) | * Intra-actions - Adam Kleinman (Mousee 34 - Karen Barad) | ||
* Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart - Karen Barad | * Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart - Karen Barad | ||
* Staying with the | * Staying with the Trouble by Donna Haraway | ||
* Dancing at the Edge of the World - Ursula K. Le Guin | * Dancing at the Edge of the World - Ursula K. Le Guin | ||
* Against World-building by Nick James Scavo | * Against World-building by Nick James Scavo | ||
Revision as of 02:48, 22 November 2021
⇄. Thesis Outline
Index
Introduction
- 1. Glossary
- 1.1. Challenging a recurrent element of a publication.
- 1.2. Possible ontologies and world-building with words.
- 2. System
- 2.1. The nature of this glossary: The publishing practice as a living open system
- 2.2. Weaving different realms: an inter-connected world.
- 3. Experiment
- 3.1. Playing with the system: Threads and weaving. Speculating on possible connections and processes.
- 4. Manifesto
- 4.1. Manifestos on Publishing practices.
- 4.2. The manifesto as a tool to reflect and diffract.
- 5. Conclusion.
- 6. Bibliography.
Introduction
The purpose of this thesis is to unpack and explore separately each component of the project "Glossary for a Diffractive publishing practice". This project is part of a collaborative publishing practice I'm working on with my friend Maria Paris. It is an experimental project that aims to connect multiple vocabularies from different practices of publishing with vocabularies of other realms, in order to reflect and expand the vision of our practice.
The components are the glossary, the system, the experiment, and the manifesto. The glossary component is seen as the matter of the project. It refers to what is the project composed of. The system component is taken as the organization of the project, it explains how the project is organized. The experiment component refers to how the project moves and how it is been activated. The manifesto component is the intention. It refers to what the project aims for.
In the second chapter, I will reflect on the glossary component, by thinking about what is a glossary beyond a list of words, and what are the potentialities of using such a structure for a publication. I will introduce the glossary as the common element inside a publication that creates meaning to a specific world inside a book. I will be looking at the collaborative workshop I made called "Glossary of glossaries" as an attempt to challenge the structure, and I will articulate the ontological capabilities by bringing the idea of world-building from the texts of Ursula K. Le Guin and Tiger Dingsun.
In the third chapter, I will explain the system component, by describing how this system of words looks like and why it suggests seeing the publishing practice as a complex system. I will approach the publishing practice as a living system by recognizing its complexity beyond single descriptions or tags. For that, I will introduce an example of this from the text "soap" by Fabio Morais in which he describes the almost empty tag of saying 'Artist Book' to refer to a publication that is full of complexities. Furthermore, I will expose the interconnected capabilities of the system by describing the ontological inseparability described by Karen Barad and Donna Haraway. This will give me the opportunity to clarify why the link between different realms.
In the fourth chapter, I will attempt to exemplify the experiment component by threading connections among the words by speculating about outcomes and giving examples. I will explain what do I call a thread and how the weaving process can activate an experimental activity that can bring up practices or present already existing projects.
In the first chapter, I will explore the manifesto component of the project by stating the publishing manifesto as a tool to reflect on the practice, but furthermore as a tool for diffraction. I will show some examples of manifestos from the book Publishing Manifestos made by Miss Read. And I will articulate them to expose how by stating a mission for a future publishing practice we are reflecting proactively on the present of it. Afterward, I will introduce the term 'diffraction' to make clear that the approach of questioning the practice goes beyond a reflective attitude. A diffractive approach is going to be explored by the text Diffracting Diffraction by Karen Barad.
Bibliography
Bibliography:
- Intra-actions - Adam Kleinman (Mousee 34 - Karen Barad)
- Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart - Karen Barad
- Staying with the Trouble by Donna Haraway
- Dancing at the Edge of the World - Ursula K. Le Guin
- Against World-building by Nick James Scavo
- Chimeric Worldling: What Can Graphic Design Learn from Poetics and World-building? by Tiger Dingsun
- Soap - Fabio Morais
- Publishing Manifestos - Miss Read 2018
- Here and now? Explorations in urgent publishing - Insitute of Network Cultures