|
|
| (30 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = Thesis Outline First Draft = | | <div style='text-align:center'> |
| | <b style=' font-size:20px; '>~[[Media:ArtemisGryllaki-Thesis.pdf | Syster Systems]]~</b><br><br><br> |
|
| |
|
| ==I. Introduction== | | <br> |
| #Background:
| | <div style='text-align:center'> |
| This summer I got an email which was an open call for participation in The Eclectic Tech Carnival (/ETC), a gathering of feminists who critically explore and develop everyday skills and information technologies in the context of free speech, free software and open hardware. While reading the description, I wondered why this international group of people, identified by their gender, have the need to gather in their own spaces in order to speak about computing, technology, art and activism.
| | [[User:Artemis_gryllaki/Thesis_outline |Thesis Outline]]<br><br><br> |
| #Thesis Statement:
| |
| There is a need for feminists and activists to come together in order to discuss and shed light on the problematic issues of Technology and Software development, as gender-biased fields. In order to imagine alternative inclusive environments for collective knowledge production and Do It Together practices, feminist and activist collective work need to be documented, archived, shared and protected. This is essential in order to learn from the histories of these movements and shape future imperatives.
| |
|
| |
|
| ==II. Body==
| |
| First Topic: Hidden history or underrepresentation of female contributors in technology.<br>
| |
| Point A: Understanding of technology is gendered and different kinds of account of history shape what our assumptions are.
| |
| #The women who built "ENIAC" were until recently, written out of historical accounts.
| |
| #Missing Women biographies on Wikipedia.
| |
|
| |
|
| Second Topic: Technology is situated and shaped by the social relations that produce and use it.<br>
| | <s>[https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Artemis_Thesis_Outline_2.1 Thesis Outline 3rd Draft]</s><br> |
| Point A: Technologies are gendered by design and use.
| | <s>[https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Artemis_Thesis_Outline_2 Thesis Outline 2nd Draft]</s><br> |
| #Technological objects that convey patriarchal ideologies and reveal gender inequality.
| | <s>[https://pad.xpub.nl/p/artemis_thesis_outline Thesis Outline 1st Draft]</s> |
| | | </div> |
| Third Topic: Stories of exclusion of female computer programmers.<br>
| |
| Point A: The IT field is appropriated by men and reproduces a "male geek culture" which pushes out female and gender diverse people.
| |
| #Stories and anecdotes from the biography of Ellen Ullman "Life in Code: A Personal History of Technology"
| |
| #Stories and anecdotes from women programmers in software companies, tech forums, floss communities...
| |
| | |
| Fourth Topic: Groups of activists/feminists and their collective knowledge and memories.<br>
| |
| Point A: There is a need for Tools, methods and infrastructures to ensure that data, projects and memory of feminist groups are properly accessible, preserved and managed.
| |
| #We have seen feminist and activist work being deleted from the Internet, censored, and/or prevented from being seen, heard or read.
| |
| #Gender-based online violence in the form of trolling and hateful machoists harassing feminists/activists online and offline.
| |
| | |
| ==III. Conclusion ==
| |
