User:Andre Castro/2.1/semniar-2012-12-14

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The tutors considered your proposal and presentation, taken together, fulfill the assessment criteria.

Division

You seem to be divided between

  1. Making a generative system and
  2. Making an art piece that uses the form, structure and grammar of spam and which will require more intervention from you – these are two different possible outcomes.

Main points during discussion

Below are the bullet points made during our discussion that may help you untie the different elements

  • The questions that remain are: How are you going to make the bots agents that introduce individuals and successfully invite collaboration between them?
  • Are you going to spam (literally hit millions) or use spam as a form of para-literature machine? The tests you did were to a small sample known to you. So you have a choice about how you want to scale it: you can spam for real and get the bots working or use the language, protocols and mechanisms of spam to make a ‘meta spamsphere’ or fictive frame which you have more control over and which is of a smaller scale.
  • We talked about your project as an opportunity to ‘re-value’ spam. Keep this in mind. Explore the traditions within LIterary criticism of the 're-valuation of texts.'

Need to differentiate

There are three areas you need to differentiate in order to give the project clarity:

  1. The elevation of the cultural value of spam (spam as a form of literary critique)
  2. Spam as a network of texts which has a structure running through it
  3. Consider the forms of enacting spam (through your own performance, through sampling existing texts, through co-authorship and automatic generation)


Other notes (to unpack during tutorials)

  • Consider spam as a form of para-literature, which is part of a folk history and net of stories that has not yet been mediated or digested. This makes a form of ‘latent literature’.
  • Spam text has a distinct grammar, form and mode of address.
  • Re-writing e-mails as a form of play which allows for complexity

On your progress in the course as a whole:

there is an admirably clear connection between your practical work and your theoretical studies.