The Archive of the Transcendental Archive: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==== Question 2.0: How to access the T.A.? ==== | ==== Question 2.0: How to access the T.A.? ==== | ||
Direct access to the T.A. is prohibited to human beings. Entities such as God, for example, would probably have access, but at the same time these entities will be archivable objects inside the T.A. – thus | Direct access to the T.A. is prohibited to human beings. Entities such as God, for example, would probably have access, but at the same time these entities will be archivable objects inside the T.A. – thus lacking the authority of the archivist or 'archon.'<ref name="fever"> Jacques Derrida, ''Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression'', diacritics 25.2, 1995. p10</ref> | ||
It has been previously suggested (in 1790), that it would be possible to have an indirect glimpse into the Transcendental Archive through the experience of the sublime. Yet even this experience is rather unsatisfactory, in terms of open access and democratic archive control. The sublime would only suggest to the human mind at most 2 or perhaps 3 objects contained in the T.A. | It has been previously suggested {{citation needed}} (in 1790), that it would be possible to have an indirect glimpse into the Transcendental Archive through the experience of the sublime. Yet even this experience is rather unsatisfactory, in terms of open access and democratic archive control. The sublime would only suggest to the human mind at most 2 or perhaps 3 objects contained in the T.A. | ||
And even then, we cannot be sure. | And even then, we cannot be sure. | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 00:25, 21 September 2014
Project Description
'The Archive of the Transcendental Archive' is a project currently managed by Lucas Battich and Benjamin Antman, working through an application controlled by procedural Dadaist algorithms. Seeking to try the limits of the traditional archive and the new media archive 'The Archive of the Transcendental Archive' was first conceived over a group-reading on Derrida and Foucault together with Thomas Walskar and Eliza Marcu.
Project Notes
Note 0.1: Toward the development of a methodological approach to the Transcendental Archive (and its Archive) by way of pataphysical questioning
Question 42: What?
Given that there may (or may not) exist a realm completely unknowable to human thought, it may be inferred that such realm would contain (or not) a series of objects/artefacts/manifestations which may (or may not) be archivable. The Transcendental Archive is composed of such unknowable noumena. It may even contain itself as the Archive-in-itself, the Dinge-an-sich.
Come again, what?
Question 3: Why?
In 1923 George Mallory was asked by unsympathetic journalists 'Why climb Everest?' He supposedly replied with the now famous words: 'Because it's there.'
We, on the other hand, cannot know whether the Transcendental Archive is there or not. It is for this reason, however, that we sense the urge to develop an Archive of the Transcendental Archive.
Question 2.0: How to access the T.A.?
Direct access to the T.A. is prohibited to human beings. Entities such as God, for example, would probably have access, but at the same time these entities will be archivable objects inside the T.A. – thus lacking the authority of the archivist or 'archon.'[1]
It has been previously suggested [citation needed] (in 1790), that it would be possible to have an indirect glimpse into the Transcendental Archive through the experience of the sublime. Yet even this experience is rather unsatisfactory, in terms of open access and democratic archive control. The sublime would only suggest to the human mind at most 2 or perhaps 3 objects contained in the T.A. And even then, we cannot be sure.
- ↑ Jacques Derrida, Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression, diacritics 25.2, 1995. p10