|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==copyright== | | ==free culture== |
|
| |
|
| <blockquote>
| | https://sound.constantvzw.org/Authors-of-the-future/recordings/5_Aymeric_Mansoux_Free_Only_if.wav |
| A copyright is a type of intellectual property that gives the creator of an original work, or another right holder, the exclusive and legally secured right to copy, distribute, adapt, display, and perform a creative work, usually for a limited time.
| |
| </blockquote>
| |
|
| |
|
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright | | See also for a deeeep dive: https://www.bleu255.com/~aymeric/dump/aymeric_mansoux-sandbox_culture_phd_thesis-2017.pdf |
|
| |
|
| ==4 free software freedoms== | | ===xerox mark=== |
|
| |
|
| <blockquote>
| | [[File:A-Xerox-Mark-Radical-Software-1973.png|500px]] |
| - The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0).<br> | |
| - The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.<br> | |
| - The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help others (freedom 2).<br> | |
| - The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this. | |
| </blockquote>
| |
|
| |
|
| https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html
| | http://www.radicalsoftware.org/e/volume1nr3.html |
|
| |
|
| ==free culture== | | ===copy it right=== |
|
| |
|
| <blockquote>
| | [[File:COPY-IT-RIGHT-3195163650 73d1e7ed3e o.jpg|500px]] |
| In this first part, I counter two points that have been taken for granted
| |
| with free and open source software production, and the subsequent rise
| |
| of free culture.
| |
|
| |
|
| The first point is the idea that free and open source software is primarily the opposition to closed source, proprietary, software
| | [[File:COPY IT RIGHT-morton distributionreligion intro.jpg|500px]] |
| and standards, and this for reasons that can be articulated on the grounds
| |
| of either ethics or economics.
| |
|
| |
|
| The second point is the notion that all the | | Morton developed an approach he called COPY-IT-RIGHT, an anti-copyright approach to making and freely sharing Media art. The Distribution Religion and Morton’s individual and collaborative Media art works were released under his COPY-IT-RIGHT license. COPY-IT-RIGHT encouraged people to make faithful copies, caring for and distributing the work as widely as possible. |
| things derived from free and open source software are simple variations
| |
| on the same theme, and are bound together in a common struggle with
| |
| a shared intention or agenda, from which every participating group can
| |
| benefit.
| |
|
| |
|
| These two elements have led to misunderstandings, or to be more
| | ===GPL=== |
| precise, have prevented an acknowledgement of the tension between different attempts to normalise and rationalise free culture and the richness
| |
| of its practices and contexts.
| |
|
| |
|
| In particular, I want to falsify first the notion
| | GNU General Public License |
| of free and open source software as a paradigm shift, by showing another
| |
| side of this revolutionary dimension in the fabrication of virtual communities which emulate endangered and speculative practices, and second,
| |
| demonstrate that the culture of free and open things is a in fact a struggle,
| |
| but not against an external hegemony, but a struggle within itself which
| |
| is symptomatic of liberal democratic and post-political systems.
| |
| | |
| Each of
| |
| these arguments will be expressed in two chapters: Chapter 1 Paradigm
| |
| Maintenance and User Freedom, and Chapter 2 In Search of Pluralism.
| |
| </blockquote>
| |
| | |
| Aymeric Mansoux, Sandbox Culture, A Study of the Application of Free and Open Source Software Licensing Ideas to Art and Cultural Production
| |
| | |
| https://www.bleu255.com/~aymeric/dump/aymeric_mansoux-sandbox_culture_phd_thesis-2017.pdf#page=40
| |
| | |
| OR
| |
| | |
| https://sound.constantvzw.org/Authors-of-the-future/recordings/5_Aymeric_Mansoux_Free_Only_if.wav
| |
|
| |
|
| ==the rising ethical storm==
| | https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html |
|
| |
|
| {{#Widget:Video|mp4=https://archive.org/download/copyleftconf2020-ehmke/Salle%20des%20Arches%201340%20-%20The%20Rising%20Ethical%20Storm%20In%20Open%20Source.mp4|style=width:700px;}}
| | ===copyleft=== |
|
| |
|
| Coraline Ada Ehmke on ethical open licenses, presented at CopyleftConf 2020.
| | the "viral" element used in some of the open licenses |
|
| |
|
| https://archive.org/details/copyleftconf2020-ehmke
| | ===Creative Commons=== |
|
| |
|
| The blog post that Ehmke refers to in her presentation by Bruce Perens, in which he critiques the Hippocratic License: https://perens.com/2019/09/23/sorry-ms-ehmke-the-hippocratic-license-cant-work/
| | https://creativecommons.org/ |
