Newtextnikos

♯in progress♯

Im interested in the issue of identity in the networked society and particularly in online identity. According to Foucault in industrial society individuality is constructed. The self can be seen as a defensive mechanism. In postindustrial society the self encounters new paths through informational interchanges and the rise of new technologies. The work of Harraway and her notions of fragmented identites express the optimistic view on technological liberation and the self ,that seems to be around since the early internet 90s, where critical attitudes with concepts like the institutional self (Illouz), multiple selfs (Lovink), posthuman critisism(Hayles) emerge. Some fragments of positivism can though be detected in more contemporary writers, for example Cheungs approach to personal homepages as emancipatory media and Turkles new internet identities. Transhumanist NVitaMore speaks about the right on the design of the self but agrees with Hayles on some aspects of criticism. Why would we like to have an uploaded version of a person without the person? Hayles particulary expresses some anxiety about how our consciousness would change and be something we cant imagine. It is very critical to understand the concepts of identity, individuality and the self. Are they constructions? Humans consist of biological information but if the self and identity are constructions (of the mind) we could also argue that parcitularly in the networked society they are constructed and built on information collections, metadata and in a distributed context. And a model to understand this construction and the design of them is the database. Morevoer we could emhpasize the fact that the person of participatory capitalism is the outcome of participatory (self) design methodologies that share a lot with curator and librarian practises, like narrative approaches, mixing objects, taxonomy and folskonomy. Identity seems to have been always built on metadata. "Who am i ? I am (name), child of (names), I live (place), I am (number) years. etc. Modern identity includes all above but also biological charakteristics, political and religion beliefs, entry numbers in a variety of catalogues, locations, photographs, signarutes, stamps, traces of bureocracy and stability, control and demand. Postmodern identity has been exposed in a new spectrum of possibilities, related with the movements of the 60s and 70s, ICT and the rise of neoliberalism. In parallel, during the 70s information literacy concepts emerge. Is this new personality model desired within the competative service based marketplace or a way to form a more strong skilled person that would be also flexible in managing its own information collections in order to reestablish a coherent personal narrative in the sense of the reflexive project of the self of Giddens? Networked/ online identites can be read as the identities of the societies of dictributed network, computer and protocol. In a transition taking place withing the information age that virtualy consists of the transformation of information societies to postinformation societies, new possibilites and new anxieties emerge related with identity and the self. From identity exploration we are driving to identity curation and and self preservation. This seems to underline the consructed charakter of identity. What has changed in the way we perceive and present ourselves? Is the self still a defensive mechanism that would support the individual or as Jaime de Val believes, the self is a part of imperialistic tradition and historical continuity? Is identity a coherent expression of ourselves, something useless or a problem? ♯in progress♯