Group crit: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
Each crit will develop through the following structure:
Each crit will develop through the following structure:


'''15min:''' You begin by showing your work: your recent developments towards your graduation project to the rest of the group. Whatever is the form of your current work you are developing - a book, a workshop, a performance a networked piece - in whatever form you choose to present it to it - invite us to do exercise which, show us the outcome of one of your processes, present documentation. '''The focus should be in your recent efforts'''. Avoid justifying them or speculating how what you are presenting will lead to a graduation work.
'''15min:''' You begin by showing your work: your recent developments towards your graduation project to the rest of the group. Independently form of your current work you are developing - a book, a workshop, a performance a networked piece - you are invited to present it to us through the form you think it best communicates. You can invite us to do exercise, show us the outcome of one of your processes, present documentation, do a lecture or performace. '''The focus should be in your recent efforts'''. Avoid justifying the work you are presenting or speculating how what you are presenting will lead to a graduation work.


'''30min:''' The rest of the group discusses what they just saw/heard/did, expressing opinions, questions, criticism. You ought to remains silent, but attentive to the discussion.
'''30min:''' The rest of the group discusses what they saw/heard/did, expressing opinions, questions, criticism. You ought to remains silent, but attentive to the discussion. You can also choose to record it or annotate it.


'''15min:''' You are is free to join the discussion and share us your point of view or the questions raised. Be open for different perspectives on your work, they will give you an idea of how your work might be read by your audience.
'''15min:''' You are is free to join the discussion and share your point-of-view on the questions and issues raised. Be open for different perspectives on your work, they will give you an idea of how your work might be read by your audience.


The same process is repeated for the next one inline.
The same process is repeated for the next one inline.


 
If needed small adjustments might be made to this strucuture.  
If needed small adjustments might be made to this scheme.  


==Schedule==
==Schedule==

Revision as of 13:14, 5 February 2018

Every second Monday (furing February and March), from 4-6pm we will do a group critic dedicated to the graduation work of two or three of you.

The purpose of the crit is for you to present and receive feedback from others on your graduation project's developments.

Each crit, will be dedicated to the work of two or three of you. See schedule in http://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mw-mediadesign/index.php?title=Group_crit and add yourself to one of the dates.

structure

Each crit will develop through the following structure:

15min: You begin by showing your work: your recent developments towards your graduation project to the rest of the group. Independently form of your current work you are developing - a book, a workshop, a performance a networked piece - you are invited to present it to us through the form you think it best communicates. You can invite us to do exercise, show us the outcome of one of your processes, present documentation, do a lecture or performace. The focus should be in your recent efforts. Avoid justifying the work you are presenting or speculating how what you are presenting will lead to a graduation work.

30min: The rest of the group discusses what they saw/heard/did, expressing opinions, questions, criticism. You ought to remains silent, but attentive to the discussion. You can also choose to record it or annotate it.

15min: You are is free to join the discussion and share your point-of-view on the questions and issues raised. Be open for different perspectives on your work, they will give you an idea of how your work might be read by your audience.

The same process is repeated for the next one inline.

If needed small adjustments might be made to this strucuture.

Schedule

  • 12 Feb 4-6pm (2 students):
  • 12 March 3-6pm (3 students):
  • 19 March 4-6pm (2 students):

Pleun, Karina, Giulia, Emily, Nadine, Max, Franc