Draft - Thesis outline Irma: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(46 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="background-color: #A9BCF5; color: black; border style: dots; font-family: Helvetica;">
DOCU : Terms and Conditions May Apply (2013) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncouFwTR6Qg
DOCU : genaration like (2014) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugaz-LwNPOk
DOCU : Tallhotblond (2009) (trailer) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYOIL7tsxqk
 
movie based on story Tallhotblond (2012)
 
Artists tips, David:
 
Leeds 13 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leeds_13 
 
Joseph Beuys https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2016/jan/30/fat-felt-fall-earth-making-and-myths-joseph-beuys
 
 
Article tip Marloes
https://blendle.com/i/de-limburger/ik-word-gevolgd-dus-ik-verdien/bnl-delimburger-20170814-40d37702_7db1_11e7_94d0_894f1a18177f?sharer=eyJ2ZXJzaW9uIjoiMSIsInVpZCI6ImlybWFvbGRlbmJ1cmciLCJpdGVtX2lkIjoiYm5sLWRlbGltYnVyZ2VyLTIwMTcwODE0LTQwZDM3NzAyXzdkYjFfMTFlN185NGQwXzg5NGYxYTE4MTc3ZiJ9
 
Other
https://blendle.com/i/the-new-york-times/drumming-up-business-get-a-you-tube-star-to-sell-your-product/bnl-newyorktimes-20160225-28_1?sharer=eyJ2ZXJzaW9uIjoiMSIsInVpZCI6ImlybWFvbGRlbmJ1cmciLCJpdGVtX2lkIjoiYm5sLW5ld3lvcmt0aW1lcy0yMDE2MDIyNS0yOF8xIn0%3D
 
How ‘Hunger Games’ Built Up Must-See Fever
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/19/business/media/how-hunger-games-built-up-must-see-fever.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


'''19-10-2017, 10 o'clock.
Dear reader, since our last meeting I've been focussing on reading, summarizing and analyzing relevant points for my thesis. To keep it clear, I've made a separate page with the 5 summaries of "text". See this link '''</span></p> <div style='font-family:Courier,Sans;font-size:14px;'>




<div>
<div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="background-color: #ffc300; color: black; border style: dots; font-family: Helvetica;"> [[Link to 5 summaries of relevant articles, books or videos in 200 words]]</span></p>
<div style='font-family:Courier,Sans;font-size:14px;'>


<div style='font-size:30px; padding-left:10px;margin-bottom:-18px;'>
<div style='font-size:30px; padding-left:10px;margin-bottom:-18px;'>
Line 14: Line 36:
<div style='font-size:14px; padding-left:10px;'>A research on the cause and effect of storytelling</div>
<div style='font-size:14px; padding-left:10px;'>A research on the cause and effect of storytelling</div>


<div>


<div>
==WHAT==
I  want my thesis to be about the cause and effect of storytelling, the methods of the rhetorics behind the manipulation. The way the story is told is very relevant to judge the trustworthiness of the information. But how important is it that a story is true? Is there is such a thing as Plato call's ''a noble lie''? What is noble? Was Edward Bernays intention noble if we would analyze his book ''organizing Choas''? I think I believe there is an ultimate truth, but couldn't you say that the truth is always subjective interpretation? That there would always exist an alternative version of my interpretation of truth and therefore I could never tell the truth?
 
==HOW==
The idea is to frame my thesis in a magazine structure, You could think of fictional interviews, small essays, film review, comics, etc. I think it is interesting to shape my thesis story into a form that connects to the target audience I'm aiming for: Interested in art, but doesn't feel they have the time for a pack of A4's. Herby, I would like to keep in mind the writing "rules" from George Orwell, to shape information in an approachable way. This form is the apple-sauce and the information/knowledge the necessary vegetables you need to eat to be healthy. (Does this make sense? Or is it a Dutch thing to mix apple-sauce with a meal to make their children eat vegetables?)
 
I would like to ask some help from others, for example:
* I would like a fellow artist to make illustrations by some of the essays.
* I would like a journalist to interview me about my work in the past and the graduation project. I can imagine it would be interesting to read about my work written by someone else.
* I would like to ask a Storyboard Artist to create a scene from one from the movie. [https://www.fiverr.com/animexstudios5r/draw-a-storyboard-for-you?context&context_referrer=search_gigs&context_type=auto&pos=9&ref_ctx_id=7dba36fd-4f16-46b3-8322-0a7fe6d35b2e&funnel=74a5af56-642c-4543-8fac-5650e51e5224|for example]
 
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="background-color:#42bfc5;color:WHITE; border style: dots; font-family: Helvetica;"> [http://irma-paperwork.com/style  CLICK HERE FOR MAGAZINE MOODBOARD PROPOSAL]</span></p>
<div style='font-family:Courier,Sans;font-size:14px;'>
 
==WHY==
With this thesis I want to accomplish several things:
 
*  to give the reader more inside into my work and related subjects. Every Character in my graduation movie is connected to a philosophy that I want to touch on in my research. The magazine-style will give me the grid to structure the different theories and show parts of my works in a different way.
 
* Get a clear understanding of theory I'm working with and how it connects to my work.
 
==Pages of magazine==


Note, I'm researching the idea to structure my thesis in a magazine structure, you could think of fictional interviews, small essays, film review, comic, etc.  
===Preface: So what's the point of this thesis?===
<span style="color:Blue;">
''In this chapter, I would like to introduce the reader to the themes within my artistic work and how this relates to this thesis. I want to give some insight on my choice of this magazine approach, what goals I had in mind with certain articles and how the research effects my main thesis question and my work as an artist.''


==Introduction==
In my artistic practice, I like to play with the language of communication and how this influence the interpretation of the audience. My work method, in a nutshell, is to analyze a recipe of a familiar visual communication language then use these rhetorics to plays with the expectation the public, often I try to create a tipping point in the project to express my comments or to create awareness on the theme I'm working with.
I want my thesis to be about the cause and effect of storytelling, the rhetoric's behind the manipulation in the mass media in comparison with social media. What has changed and what is and the effect it has on the interpretation of the truth. Telling the truth is generally appreciated, but couldn't you say that the truth is always subjective interpretation? That therefore there would always exist an alternative version of my interpretation of truth?


==Media Communication VS Social Media Communication==
Rhetorics in communication is used on a day to day bases and does affect us if we like it or not. These often well-known tricks are done in commercial marketing, but the seeds seem to have been spread trough politic and mass media communication. Could you say that in every form of information, there is a profit to be made? And if the information is offered for free then it's likely that the receiver is the product? This brings the receiver in a difficult position, they have to judge the intentions of the sender before they can accept the information as the truth. This thesis is representing my own personal struggle: I do believe there is an ultimate truth, an event happens in one way, not multiple ways. And I also believe there are senders with good intention, to tell the truth. But you can ever escape from someone's own interpretation? In my opinion, there is no such thing as an objective point. Believing in a truthful reproduction of an event therefor makes me feel naive. So where does this interpretation bring us? Should we still aim for the truth, even if we are not capable of bringing across a truthful story? When I try to explain my thesis outline to people within my bubble, I often get the response  '' 'But don't we already know that media, politicians, and marketers try to manipulate us?' '' Could you say that people are already are aware of this point, if so, why is everybody accepting it? Is it too hard to check the facts and are people convicted on their gut feelings?


When I try to explain my thesis outline to people within my bubble, I do get the response 'But don't we already know that media, politicians, and marketers lie to us?' I guess this is true, so how relevant is this research on the rhetorics of storytelling? My point of view today is that I wonder why we, me too, except that information could be (or probably is) a lie or misinterpretation? Why did we stop demanding the truth and accepting that they manipulate our interpretation? There is a difference between presenting only the bright side and an alternative fact.
So how relevant is this research on the rhetorics of storytelling en what insides could you give your reader? I'm interested in the gray area, most people recognise a lie, even if they accept it. Be I'm interested in the difference between presenting the bright side and claiming an alternative fact?


===CHAPTOR 1: When the marketing approach penetrated into Mass Media Communication, and how this influences our daily view on information===
Did politics change when Edward Bernays started advising President John Calvin Coolidge Jr.? Was this the moment marketing tactics entered politics? And what would happen if the gossip around Mark Zuckerberg running for the presidency would be true? How far can he influence our opinion with all the data he collected over the years?  Let's assume there are politicians whit good intentions and want to tell the truth and confidence the public with honest facts, what do they have to do to fight back? Does the good guy need a better spindoctor?  
Did politics change when Edward Bernays started advising President John Calvin Coolidge Jr.? Was this the moment marketing tactics entered politics? And what would happen if the gossip around Mark Zuckerberg running for the presidency would be true? How far can he influence our opinion with all the data he collected over the years?  Let's assume there are politicians whit good intentions and want to tell the truth and confidence the public with honest facts, what do they have to do to fight back? Does the good guy need a better spindoctor?  


Line 31: Line 77:
* Trump VS Press
* Trump VS Press
* Noam Chomsky VS Press
* Noam Chomsky VS Press
 
* Is Edward Bernays appearance in politics the tipping point?
* Edward Bernays
*
*


==philosophy, not as a chapter by itself, but a guideline throughout==
===CHAPTER 2: The power of the Storyteller===


* Socrates
A fictional conversation about the storytelling techniques with Charlie Kaufman VS Edward Bernays
* Plato - the notion of the noble lie
* Aristotle
* Nietzsche -  ''there are no facts, only interpretations''
** theory on Self-overcoming, trying to become a better version of your self, become who you really are, aim to be a superman (ubermensch)
*** Own up to Envy, use it as a guide to what we really want. See what you envy as a goal or role model.
*** Don't be a Christian (or don't follow
*** Never drink alcohol
*** God is death


** The religion of comfortableness
===CHAPTER 3: I'm online therefore I am===


{{#widget:YouTube|id=wHWbZmg2hzU}}
The freedom/duty of representing yourself as a persona
{{#widget:YouTube|id=bxiKqA-u8y4}}
{{#widget:YouTube|id=ti9zdpLlXf0}}
{{#widget:YouTube|id=vzcD-LCKuNs}}
 
== Representing a persona - '' I'm online therefore I am'' ==
 
The freedom/duty of representing yourself '' I'm online therefore I am''


* Rachel Dolezal - a white woman pretending to be black.
* Rachel Dolezal - a white woman pretending to be black.
Line 63: Line 93:
* Socrates
* Socrates


==The power of the Storyteller - fictional conversation about the storytelling techniques==
===CHAPTER 4: Is truth is in the eyes of the beholder?===
 
* Charlie Kaufman VS Edward Bernays
* Maybe Patricia Highsmith, Hitchcock
 
 
== What makes a reliable big other to follow? ==
 
Maybe this is the strange duck in my research, although I think this is a relevant theme within my practice.
 
* "The Big Other doesn't exist" - Slavoj Zizek
* The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins
 
==Truth in Neuroscience? ''Truth is in the eyes of the beholder?'' ==


How reliable is a human brain? Could you trust what you see is the truth? I think the brain has a very important role in the interpretation of information I'm fascinated to explore this knowledge of "system" thinking, the common cognitive biases and roles of the different parts of the brain  
If you look at researches done within Neuroscience, how reliable could a human brain be? Could you trust what you see is the truth? I think the brain has a very important role in the interpretation of information I'm fascinated to explore this knowledge of "system" thinking, the common cognitive biases and roles of the different parts of the brain  


* We are our brain - Dr. Swaab
* We are our brain - Dr. Swaab
Line 85: Line 102:
* How Stories Change the Brain - [https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_stories_change_brain Article by Pal J. Zak]
* How Stories Change the Brain - [https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_stories_change_brain Article by Pal J. Zak]


{{#widget:YouTube|id=nz2yn_kiH_A}} {{#widget:YouTube|id=YM4KIw_2YPw}}
{{#widget:YouTube|id=nz2yn_kiH_A}} {{#widget:YouTube|id=YM4KIw_2YPw}}
{{#widget:YouTube|id=GzGpWSPxYxM&t=78}}
{{#widget:YouTube|id=GzGpWSPxYxM&t=78}}


==Analysing artist that play with manipulation==
===CHAPTER 5: Artist that lie for the greater good===
 
Analysing artists who have a similar a method of manipulation in their artistic practice===
* The YESmen
* The YESmen
* Floris Kaayk
* Floris Kaayk
Line 96: Line 115:
* News satire television program's such as Daily Show
* News satire television program's such as Daily Show


==Bibliography==
===Philosophy, not as a chapter by itself, but a guideline throughout===
 
* Socrates
* Plato - the notion of the noble lie
* Aristotle
* Nietzsche -  ''there are no facts, only interpretations''
** theory on Self-overcoming, trying to become a better version of your self, become who you really are, aim to be a superman (ubermensch)
*** Own up to Envy, use it as a guide to what we really want. See what you envy as a goal or role model.
*** Don't be a Christian (or don't follow
*** Never drink alcohol
*** God is death
 
 
** The religion of comfortableness
 
{{#widget:YouTube|id=wHWbZmg2hzU}}
{{#widget:YouTube|id=bxiKqA-u8y4}}
{{#widget:YouTube|id=ti9zdpLlXf0}}
{{#widget:YouTube|id=vzcD-LCKuNs}}
{{#widget:YouTube|id=xxrmOHJQRSs}}
 
===What makes a reliable big other to follow?===
 
Maybe this is the strange duck in my research, although I think this is a relevant theme within my practice.
 
 
===Bibliography===
* ROLAND BARTHES
* The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation
* The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation
* "The Big Other doesn't exist" - Slavoj Zizek
* "The Big Other doesn't exist" - Slavoj Zizek
Line 113: Line 159:
* {{#widget:YouTube|id=Bp6IO1I7t3Q}}
* {{#widget:YouTube|id=Bp6IO1I7t3Q}}


== Feedback Fabian, Steve, Nadine ==
====Link to 5 summaries====


* It's not clear for Fabian, are these the chapters already?
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="background-color: #ffc300; color: black; border style: dots; font-family: Helvetica;"> [[Link to 5 summaries of relevant articles, books or videos in 200 words]]</span></p>
* It's not very clear what is the connection with Rachel or representing the persona.
<div style='font-family:Courier,Sans;font-size:14px;'>
* Something are a bit far fed, some a bit abstract, it could be more specific.
* Steve things a case study is a good idea, maybe a case study of her own work
* You've got storytelling, truth-telling, representation of true or false identity, but the o
* Social media communication is related to the film and previous work.
* Steve things an important element is rhetorics, but she should be more specific on what kind of rhetorics, you could analyze case studies instead of going in this historical path, that seems to far of your work.
* Storytelling as Rhetorics, Truth isn't relevant.
* Good to read about Post-truth, think about affective politics, this is more about emotion than reason.
(irma : Rhetorics to manipulate on an emotional level)
* Fabian, But you should realize that the thinking fast and slow, connection between emotional and reasonable thinking
* But we can agree that is is not about truth but the interpretation of truth. How storytelling affects the individual and she should use her own work as a case study.
 
* Steve : Take two of the books or articles that you are reading and write a synopsis. Use your instincts to select. 
* Book tip Steve - Post-truth by Matthew Dáncona
* Fabian Thinks about the power of words, book?


[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fU_UPISJuPBMaLBMH-e6LiGzMjfy2Fw0Sas0t2gV0EU/edit?usp=sharing Sigrun's notes on Irma's Outline]
== Irma's First thesis draft==
[[Irma's First Draft with notes]]

Latest revision as of 11:10, 25 November 2017

DOCU : Terms and Conditions May Apply (2013) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncouFwTR6Qg DOCU : genaration like (2014) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugaz-LwNPOk DOCU : Tallhotblond (2009) (trailer) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYOIL7tsxqk

movie based on story Tallhotblond (2012)

Artists tips, David:

Leeds 13 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leeds_13

Joseph Beuys https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2016/jan/30/fat-felt-fall-earth-making-and-myths-joseph-beuys


Article tip Marloes https://blendle.com/i/de-limburger/ik-word-gevolgd-dus-ik-verdien/bnl-delimburger-20170814-40d37702_7db1_11e7_94d0_894f1a18177f?sharer=eyJ2ZXJzaW9uIjoiMSIsInVpZCI6ImlybWFvbGRlbmJ1cmciLCJpdGVtX2lkIjoiYm5sLWRlbGltYnVyZ2VyLTIwMTcwODE0LTQwZDM3NzAyXzdkYjFfMTFlN185NGQwXzg5NGYxYTE4MTc3ZiJ9

Other https://blendle.com/i/the-new-york-times/drumming-up-business-get-a-you-tube-star-to-sell-your-product/bnl-newyorktimes-20160225-28_1?sharer=eyJ2ZXJzaW9uIjoiMSIsInVpZCI6ImlybWFvbGRlbmJ1cmciLCJpdGVtX2lkIjoiYm5sLW5ld3lvcmt0aW1lcy0yMDE2MDIyNS0yOF8xIn0%3D

How ‘Hunger Games’ Built Up Must-See Fever http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/19/business/media/how-hunger-games-built-up-must-see-fever.html






Isn't the alternative truth all we have?

A research on the cause and effect of storytelling

WHAT

I want my thesis to be about the cause and effect of storytelling, the methods of the rhetorics behind the manipulation. The way the story is told is very relevant to judge the trustworthiness of the information. But how important is it that a story is true? Is there is such a thing as Plato call's a noble lie? What is noble? Was Edward Bernays intention noble if we would analyze his book organizing Choas? I think I believe there is an ultimate truth, but couldn't you say that the truth is always subjective interpretation? That there would always exist an alternative version of my interpretation of truth and therefore I could never tell the truth?

HOW

The idea is to frame my thesis in a magazine structure, You could think of fictional interviews, small essays, film review, comics, etc. I think it is interesting to shape my thesis story into a form that connects to the target audience I'm aiming for: Interested in art, but doesn't feel they have the time for a pack of A4's. Herby, I would like to keep in mind the writing "rules" from George Orwell, to shape information in an approachable way. This form is the apple-sauce and the information/knowledge the necessary vegetables you need to eat to be healthy. (Does this make sense? Or is it a Dutch thing to mix apple-sauce with a meal to make their children eat vegetables?)

I would like to ask some help from others, for example:

  • I would like a fellow artist to make illustrations by some of the essays.
  • I would like a journalist to interview me about my work in the past and the graduation project. I can imagine it would be interesting to read about my work written by someone else.
  • I would like to ask a Storyboard Artist to create a scene from one from the movie. example

CLICK HERE FOR MAGAZINE MOODBOARD PROPOSAL

WHY

With this thesis I want to accomplish several things:

  • to give the reader more inside into my work and related subjects. Every Character in my graduation movie is connected to a philosophy that I want to touch on in my research. The magazine-style will give me the grid to structure the different theories and show parts of my works in a different way.
  • Get a clear understanding of theory I'm working with and how it connects to my work.

Pages of magazine

Preface: So what's the point of this thesis?

In this chapter, I would like to introduce the reader to the themes within my artistic work and how this relates to this thesis. I want to give some insight on my choice of this magazine approach, what goals I had in mind with certain articles and how the research effects my main thesis question and my work as an artist.

In my artistic practice, I like to play with the language of communication and how this influence the interpretation of the audience. My work method, in a nutshell, is to analyze a recipe of a familiar visual communication language then use these rhetorics to plays with the expectation the public, often I try to create a tipping point in the project to express my comments or to create awareness on the theme I'm working with.

Rhetorics in communication is used on a day to day bases and does affect us if we like it or not. These often well-known tricks are done in commercial marketing, but the seeds seem to have been spread trough politic and mass media communication. Could you say that in every form of information, there is a profit to be made? And if the information is offered for free then it's likely that the receiver is the product? This brings the receiver in a difficult position, they have to judge the intentions of the sender before they can accept the information as the truth. This thesis is representing my own personal struggle: I do believe there is an ultimate truth, an event happens in one way, not multiple ways. And I also believe there are senders with good intention, to tell the truth. But you can ever escape from someone's own interpretation? In my opinion, there is no such thing as an objective point. Believing in a truthful reproduction of an event therefor makes me feel naive. So where does this interpretation bring us? Should we still aim for the truth, even if we are not capable of bringing across a truthful story? When I try to explain my thesis outline to people within my bubble, I often get the response 'But don't we already know that media, politicians, and marketers try to manipulate us?' Could you say that people are already are aware of this point, if so, why is everybody accepting it? Is it too hard to check the facts and are people convicted on their gut feelings?

So how relevant is this research on the rhetorics of storytelling en what insides could you give your reader? I'm interested in the gray area, most people recognise a lie, even if they accept it. Be I'm interested in the difference between presenting the bright side and claiming an alternative fact?

CHAPTOR 1: When the marketing approach penetrated into Mass Media Communication, and how this influences our daily view on information

Did politics change when Edward Bernays started advising President John Calvin Coolidge Jr.? Was this the moment marketing tactics entered politics? And what would happen if the gossip around Mark Zuckerberg running for the presidency would be true? How far can he influence our opinion with all the data he collected over the years? Let's assume there are politicians whit good intentions and want to tell the truth and confidence the public with honest facts, what do they have to do to fight back? Does the good guy need a better spindoctor?

  • News- The war on facts
  • Trump VS Press
  • Noam Chomsky VS Press
  • Is Edward Bernays appearance in politics the tipping point?

CHAPTER 2: The power of the Storyteller

A fictional conversation about the storytelling techniques with Charlie Kaufman VS Edward Bernays

CHAPTER 3: I'm online therefore I am

The freedom/duty of representing yourself as a persona

  • Rachel Dolezal - a white woman pretending to be black.
  • Social media -
  • Jacques Lacan - mirror stage
  • Socrates

CHAPTER 4: Is truth is in the eyes of the beholder?

If you look at researches done within Neuroscience, how reliable could a human brain be? Could you trust what you see is the truth? I think the brain has a very important role in the interpretation of information I'm fascinated to explore this knowledge of "system" thinking, the common cognitive biases and roles of the different parts of the brain

  • We are our brain - Dr. Swaab
  • Wired for Storytelling - Lisa Cron
  • Thinking fast and slow - Daniel Kahneman
  • How Stories Change the Brain - Article by Pal J. Zak

CHAPTER 5: Artist that lie for the greater good

Analysing artists who have a similar a method of manipulation in their artistic practice===

  • The YESmen
  • Floris Kaayk

Commenting/bringing the news in a lighter/creative way

  • Southpark
  • News satire television program's such as Daily Show

Philosophy, not as a chapter by itself, but a guideline throughout

  • Socrates
  • Plato - the notion of the noble lie
  • Aristotle
  • Nietzsche - there are no facts, only interpretations
    • theory on Self-overcoming, trying to become a better version of your self, become who you really are, aim to be a superman (ubermensch)
      • Own up to Envy, use it as a guide to what we really want. See what you envy as a goal or role model.
      • Don't be a Christian (or don't follow
      • Never drink alcohol
      • God is death


    • The religion of comfortableness

What makes a reliable big other to follow?

Maybe this is the strange duck in my research, although I think this is a relevant theme within my practice.


Bibliography

  • ROLAND BARTHES
  • The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation
  • "The Big Other doesn't exist" - Slavoj Zizek
  • The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins
  • Jacques Lacan - mirror stage
  • MANUFACTURING CONSENT The Political Economy of the Mass Media by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky (1988)
  • Manufacturing Consent - Noam Chomsky And The Media-The Companion Book To The Award-Winning Film by Peter Wintonick and Mark Achbar (1994)
  • The Propaganda Model: a retrospective by Edward S. Herman
  • The Century of the Self -Adam Curtis
  • We are our brain - Dr Swaab
  • Wired for Story telling - Lisa Cron
  • Thinking fast and slow - Daniel Kahneman
  • Plotting and Writing suspense fiction - Patrica Highsmith
  • Post-truth by Matthew Dáncona

Link to 5 summaries

Link to 5 summaries of relevant articles, books or videos in 200 words

Irma's First thesis draft

Irma's First Draft with notes