View source for Derrida, Jacques - Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression

==Notes==

In simple terms, I found the text to describe how the archive is essentially an attempt to control a subject. In Greece, the subject were the subjects - the people that lived within the hierarchical greek society: for them, the archive had a 'sequential' and 'jussive' function - it placed events and objects in a temporal space ("commencement"), but also within a legal space of power and control ("commandment"). So the archive has a dual function: to record, but to record in such a way as to control. The archons (the 'superior magistrates'), for example, are awarded the 'power to interpret the archives.' (2) The control comes from the archons' ability to omit, and their ability to include. As a result, the archive could be understood to be a tool to maintain a hegemonic structure.

Derrida also notes Freud's remarks about the human 'instinct of destruction' - the 'death drive'. (5) Derrida states that the consequence of this drive: "what permits and conditions archivization, we will never find anything other than what exposes to destruction, in truth what menaces with destruction introducing, a priori, forgetfulness and the archiviolithic into the heart of the monument." (6) I am slightly unclear on this point - does he mean to archive is a destructive act? Or is it to try to reclaim control over an instinct of self-destruction? If the former, in which way is it destructive? He clarifies at the end of section 1 of the introduction that the 'archive fever', the obsessive act of archiving, is created by the death drive: "There would indeed be no archive desire without the radical finitude, without the possibility of a forgetfulness which does not limit itself to repression. [...] There is no archive fever without the threat of this death drive." (7)

One point that particularly caught my attention is the 'interface' of the archive - the methods with which the archivist creates the documentary artifacts. Derrida states: "This should above all remind us that the said archival technology no longer determines, will never have determined, merely the moment of the conservational recording, but rather the very institution of the archivable event."  (6) He continues, discussing the "pressure of the printing, the impression", and how the tactile features of documentary medium inherently changes the processes and power-relationships within the act of archiving itself.
''-dave''

<font color="hotpink">
Interesting is that Derrida is psychoanalysing why we archive. It does have a negative tone though, how archive dictates culture. In that way it would not be very open to the new and unexpected. An unfortunate set of rules that would sort of go against the development of culture by learning about other cultures? ''-dennis''
</font>