Criteria for evaluation (Thesis): Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:




  evidence of a clearly structured analysis and argument
* evidence of a clearly structured analysis and argument


use of relevant source material and references
* use of relevant source material and references


clarity of writing
* clarity of writing


attention to alternate arguments and sources
* attention to alternate arguments and sources


ability to research texts and practices and reflect upon them analytically
* ability to research texts and practices and reflect upon them analytically


ability to manage ‘interdisciplinary’ material
* ability to manage ‘interdisciplinary’ material


clear referencing according to the Harvard system
* clear referencing according to the Harvard system


ability to position ones own views within a broader context

* ability to position ones own views within a broader context






Revision as of 11:46, 11 September 2019

Here are the outcome criteria for essays and Thesis that the students are encouraged to follow:


  • evidence of a clearly structured analysis and argument
  • use of relevant source material and references
  • clarity of writing
  • attention to alternate arguments and sources
  • ability to research texts and practices and reflect upon them analytically
  • ability to manage ‘interdisciplinary’ material
  • clear referencing according to the Harvard system
  • ability to position ones own views within a broader context



Back to main:

http://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Graduate_Seminar_2019-2020#Session_2:_19_September