User:Manetta/i-could-have-written-that/text-mining-critique

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
< User:Manetta‎ | i-could-have-written-that
Revision as of 16:01, 26 November 2015 by Manetta (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<div style="width:100%;max-width:750px;"> __NOTOC__ =what about text-mining?= 750px ==text mining, what about it!?== * * ==points of critique== <small>fr...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

what about text-mining?

File:None.png

text mining, what about it!?

points of critique

from: Critical Algorithm Studies: a Reading List

  • 0. overviews
    • 0.1 technical and philosophical precursors / emic “what are algorithms?” essays
    • 0.2 field surveys / keywords / initial provocations
    • 0.3 books about algorithms addressed to broader audiences
    • 0.4 lists of algorithm studies resources
  • 1. the specific implications of algorithms and the choices they make
    • 1.1 algorithms have embedded values / biases, lead to personalization / social sorting / discrimination
    • 1.2 with algorithms come rationalization / automation / quantification,and the erasure of human judgment / complexity / context
    • 1.3 questions of accountability and policy responses around algorithms
  • 2. algorithms fit with, and help advance, specific ideological worldviews
  • 3. algorithms are complex technical assemblages, that have to be mapped
  • 4. algorithms aren’t just technical artifacts, they’re fundamentally human in their design and their use
    • 4.1 people design and maintain algorithms, in specific ways, and that matters
    • 4.2 people work, play, and live algorithms, in specific ways, and that matters
    • 4.3 what do users understand about algorithms
    • 4.4 the discursive production of algorithms to shape their public perception
  • 5. methods and approaches for studying algorithmic systems


notes

(...)

references


related

* project: WordNet