Notes2ndtrim

The most elementary definition of ideology is probably the well-known phrase from Marx's Capital: "Sie wissen das nicht, aber sie tun es" ("they do not know it, but they are doing it"). The very concept of ideology implies a kind of basic, constitutive naïveté: the misrecognition of its own presuppositions, of its own effective conditions, a distance, a divergence between so-called social reality and our distorted representation, our false consciousness of it

it is the classic concept of ideology as 'false consciousness', misrecognition of the social reality which is part of this reality itself. Our question is: Does this concept of ideology as a naive consciousness still apply to today's world? Is it still operating today? In the Critique of Cynical Reason, a great bestseller in Germany (Sloterdijk, 1983), Peter Sloterdijk puts forward the thesis that ideology's dominant mode of functioning is cynical, which renders impossible- or, more precisely, vain — the classic critical-ideological procedure. The cynical subject is quite aware of the distance between the ideological mask and the social reality, but he none the less still insists upon the mask

The formula, as proposed by Sloterdijk, would then be: "they know very well what they are doing, but still, they are doing it". Cynical reason is no longer naïve, but is a paradox of an enlightened false consciousness: one knows the falsehood very well, one is well aware of a particular interest hidden behind an ideological universality, but still one does not renounce it.

Cynicism is the answer of the ruling culture to kynical subversion

This cynicism is therefore a kind of perverted 'negation of the negation' of the official ideology

It is clear, therefore, that confronted with such cynical reason, the traditional critique of ideology no longer works

We can no longer subject the ideological text to 'symptomatic reading'.

Adorno , ideology is, strictly speaking, only a system which makes a claim to the truth, not simply a lie but a lie experienced as truth, a lie which pretends to be taken seriously.

Totalitarian ideology no longer has this pretension. It is no longer meant, even by its authors, to be taken seriously — its status is just that of a means of manipulation, purely external and instrumental; its rule is secured not by its truth-value but by simple extra-ideological violence and promise of gain.

from CYNICISM AS A FORM OF IDEOLOGY SLAVOJ ZIZEK. THE SUBLIME OBJECT OF IDEOLOGY (LONDON; NEW YORK: VERSO, 1989), PP. 28-30. http://www.egs.edu/faculty/slavoj-zizek/articles/cynicism-as-a-form-of-ideology/

-=-= Marx, Sie wissen das nicht, aber sie tun es Zizek ideology as 'false consciousness',zizek cultural capitalism (todays form of capitalism) starbucks is mroe what u bying into. than what u buy. u are buyinh into a cofee ethics

the remedies are part of the disease last attempt to make capitalism work for socialism ETHICS global capitalism with a human face (mroe human more tolerant etc ) relative freedom, wellfare, security etc a certain type of misantrhopy which is much better than this charitable humanism? A MIXTURE zero point(biogenetiks nw aparthieds, eologiclly etc) repairing with the right hand what u destroy with the left hand George Soros gates etc reenergised 19th cent philantrhopy Sloterdijk ideology's dominant mode of functioning is cynical

the cinical subject is quite aware of the distance between the ideological mask and the social reality, but he none the less still insists upon the mask Adorno system which makes a claim to the truth, not simply a lie but a lie experienced as truth

they Live.sunglasses

how does psychoanalysis and re-enactment highlight the subjects relation to idealogy?

How does re-enactment in act of killing bring to surface the obsceneties? enjoy poverty should be 'performing poverty'

idealogy is hidden in plain sight.

"Desire is the agent of ideology." Desire for desire itself—excess ultimate melancholy experience is the loss of desire.

The excess is with us forever let’s have another coke (‘enjoy your symptom’)

HISTORY HOW THESE THINGS ARE ENSCRIBED IN HISTORY (RENZO AND ACT OF KILL AND THE SITUTATIONS AROUND ,DOCUMENATION MORE SUBJ?) PSYCHOPATHS IN FICTIONAL ?

BIG OTHER In a Stalinist universe there definitely is what in psychoanalytic theory we call the Big Other.

This Big Other in the Stalinist universe has many names. The best known of them are the necessity of historical progress towards communism or simply history. On the one hand, of course, the Big Other is the secret order of things like divine reason, fate or whatever, which is controlling our destiny.

Big other provides state of exception

This precisely is the function of the Big Other. We need for our stability, figure of Big Other for whom we maintain appearances.

They discovered the truth of what Jacques Lacan claims: there is no Big Other. There may be a virtual Big Other to whom you cannot confess.

Much more interesting is the Big Other as the order of appearances.

History itself is the big other. History is the necessary succession of historical stages.

ACT OF KILLING 'gangsters are people who work outside the system, not for the government.' through ideology, facts, events and even crimes are seen as 'natural', inevitable, history.

killing happily, psychological consequences uknown(self and social), appearances and the use of language, better economy, safety, city of good times, taking ecstasy after killing , nature and war, "morality is relative", history-narrative-identity madness unlimited, killing inspired by films, personal narrative , social narrative n crime

RENZO ALSO THS EFACT THAT INDIVIDUAL IS UNABLE TO FROM FOUCTUL ENCLOSED,THEN FROM DELEUZE WHERE INDIVIDUALS WHERE PASSING ONE TO ANOTEHR PLACE WITHOUTEND NOW U CAN GO SOMERHWRE(ACT) AND UR ACTSARE BEEING TRANSFOREMD INTO VIRTUAL ACTS

Y A FILM

why a film?

60-70s media representation of africa

RENZO MARTINS INTEVERIW I do not only film reality; film itself creates the social conditions into reality. Artists stage and create a lot of commentary on inequalities in the world. In and of itself, this is a good thing because obviously there are many problems in this world, and art is one way of addressing them Although many artists try to stage such collaborative projects through photos or videos, the trouble with these projects is that more often than not, the economic benefits of such art pieces are not found in the places where the piece the art intervenes or stages an alternativ

The IHA is not only working to close the gap, though it is a big chunk of what we do. We’re building an art center in the Congolese rainforest, and we’re asking for local people to participate. These include people who work for logging companies or on big plantations—subsistence farmers who make, let’s say, $20 a month. We ask them, and then we provide them with the opportunity to not only do what their normal job involves but also to critically reflect on their labor conditions by making drawings or videos or performance pieces. We can show them in presentations in some of the most prestigious art institutes in the world. Just imagine that a guy who has been working for 10 or 20 years on a plantation, earns about $200 a year with a full-time job, and then makes a drawing about that experience. So if we can show that drawing and then sell it to a gallery, one critical drawing about the worker’s lifestyle and his labor conditions can make five or ten times the money he’s earning from one year of work. As such, critical reflection on one’s life and labor conditions can be far more beneficial than just performing the labor one’s required to do.

We hope that the economic benefits of artistic critique can have an impact on the places where the critique came from. You can critique anything and everything. But what does this really mean, this artistic critique, if it has no impact on the lives of the people who live in the situation that you comment upon? So if people come to a place like that, they will probably be stimulated or pushed to make the artistic critique a little more poignant vis-à-vis the living conditions that they see.

objectivity

ownserhip