User:Kim/reading/The Webs Grain

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
< User:Kim‎ | reading
Revision as of 21:14, 4 February 2025 by Kim (talk | contribs)

Frank Chimero, 2015, https://frankchimero.com/blog/2015/the-webs-grain

  • starts with stating his growing frustration and disappointment in tech
  • states some basic but Website Questions regarding responsiveness
  • Bicycle Bear Websites Websites that do what they are not supposed to (going against their grain) -- to what extend can that be good or bad?

Every Material has a grain, including the web. [...] Too often the internet is cast as a wide-open, infinitely malleable material.

Web Interfaces

  • brings some website interface design examples

We use text as interface, because the nuanced but significant differences in technology's abstractions are difficult to communicate visually.

  • we share similar design solutions because they make sense for the web, we're using the same materials

What would happen if we stopped treating the web like a blank canvas to paint on, and instead like a material to build with?

David Hockney

  • Hockney's photographs resemble designing for screen vs Mona Lisa stands for designing for print
  • control vs discovery, uniformity vs multiplicity

an edgeless surface of unknown proportions comprised of small, individual, and variable elements from multiple vantages assembled into a readable whole that documents a moment

Flux and Edgelessness

  • Chimero presentation "What screens want", what does it mean to natively design for screen?
  • he says flux – the capacity for things to change.
  • and edgelessness – what I am not so sure about – there are edges we just dont often see them visually
  • Chimero then states that on a practical level, working on websites also brings forth edgelessness of disciplines - maybe ideally but not yet!

Edgelessness in Interface Design

  • In web design we dont have a fixed container size (like the printed page)
  • so lets start with arrangements of content and then put them in different sizes



  • ends the text with call to be cautious of too much convenience (in digital tech) because it limits agency