User:Thijshijsijsjss/Human Parser/About Playtesting

Playtesting as an Artistic Practise

And yes, from here on out I’ll be talking about videogames as an art form. What I mean by this is that games, digital and otherwise, transmit ideas and culture. (Anna Anthropy, 2012)

I like this statement from Anna Anthropy's book The Rise of Videogame Zinesters for its simplistic power. Games are (or can be) many things, that ultimately all fall under the transmission of experiences. Like with any other art form, this invites games to be the subject conversation and mutual reflection. While the position of games as an art is increasingly explored and accepted, it is unfortunate that many aspects of their creation are seldom considered as artistic practise. Unfortunate, not because these activities would need artistic justification, but unfortunate, because we might limit ourselves in a contrained way of thinking about these practises. By considering them artistic, and by taking inspiration from other fields of art, we might learn valuable insights to open up our design process.

One such aspect of creation is playtesting. Though often lauded as the backbone of game creation, I've seen it rarely be considered artistic -- as a practise of transmitting ideas and culture. It is often data-driven and rigid. My own experiences with playtesting (both as host and as participant) are just that: either playing by yourself, filling out forms and writing down bugs, or a vague self-indulgent activity so say 'yes, this game has been playtested'. In either case, these tests felt like a skewed dynamic between creator-observer and empty-shell-participant. Not much interpersonal transmission was happening here.

And while such tests can definitely have their merit, I wonder if this does not provide opportunity for something different. Something more personal. Something that is more promising of what games can be as a medium. Can playtests not be a moment of transmission?