((in)ter)dependence/Communities of Practise
Revision as of 12:53, 31 January 2024 by Thijshijsijsjss (talk | contribs) (Start 'paraphrasing' from Susan Leigh Star text)
Appears Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology (Susan Leigh Star, 2015, find it here on the bootleg library), that builds on the concept from Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (Lave and Wenger, 1992).
A community of practise... ... is composed of people and things, themselves in ecological relation, with numbers of representations and signals, and ways of working ... as a term emphasizes the ways in which people work together and act together to form communities ... is a way of talking about a linked web of actions, people, and artifacts
Objects in a community of practise... ... come to be only in the context and action and use ... exhibit a level of familiarity, 'taken-for-grantedness' ... are on a trajectory of naturalization -- the removal of contingencies of an object's creation and its situated nature -- that has elements of ambiguity and duration -> it is not predetermined an object wil ever become naturalized or how long it will remain so
People in a community of practise... ... are considered 'newcomer' not through their relation with other people in the community but through their relation with the objects in the community ... are on a trajectory of membership (which ranges from illegitimate peripheral participation to full membership) that consists of a series of encounters with the objects in the community and increasingly being in a naturalized relationship with them