User:Ssstephen/Reading/intertwingled

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
< User:Ssstephen‎ | Reading
Revision as of 12:32, 14 January 2024 by Ssstephen (talk | contribs) (→‎The Future of Transclusion, Akscyn, R.M. (2015))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The Future of Transclusion, Akscyn, R.M. (2015)

Akscyn, R.M. (2015). The Future of Transclusion. In: Dechow, D., Struppa, D. (eds) Intertwingled. History of Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16925-5_15

Expiditee is a system that removes many concepts of data, programming and interaction that we are used to. No desktop, dialogue boxes, files, folders, layers or menu bars. No editing mode, no focus, no scrolling. No names, text cursor or saving, apparently no user interface just content. Classes (and objects, as well as over a hundred other concepts of object-oriented programming)

No declarations (variables are self-typing). No functions (there are only procedures). No keywords (no reserved terms). No programs (there is no program level, execution can begin at any block). No symbol-controlled calling (all calls are done by links).

3.4 Results of Omissions Trajectory
In short, the over-40 years of ZOG/KMS/Expeditee trajectory has been an embarrassingly slow “de-learning” of many of the concepts computer science has used to advance the state of the art over the past five decades. Thus, from the outside, these systems appear as though little or nothing has been developed, which is precisely what was intended so that, akin to a car windshield, users are rarely aware they are using a system. Instead, they are able to keep their attention on the task at hand.

Layers in graphics programs as an example of transclusion, also style sheets. What is transcludable for me? What if transclusions like style sheets are filtered the way a graphic layer can be. What are the blending modes for css stacks? Why cascading what other forms of confluence can there be? Meeting of the waters in Brazil, the Alaknanda and the Bhagirathi at Devprayag, Uttarakhand.

He offers four dimensions to expand transclusion:

Expanding the sources of accessible material that is permissibly transcludable (i.e., does not violate copyright as well as generally accepted norms)
Expanding the set of transformations that can be performed on the transcluded material
Decreasing the size of the smallest grain size of transcludeable material
Making transclusions recursive

I think the second one interests me the most but maybe also the third. Can I transclude just the third paragraph or just the last eleven seconds of your tiktok. Can I just transclude your print styles or every page on your wiki written by more than one author.

It will always be better to be able to use just the right-sized building block for the purpose at hand, e.g., only part of an image, text, or code.
the fastest way to do something is to not have to do it at all

What can a <trans> element be? Can it be seen without being defined? Is there space for it? How is it allowed to behave? Does it exist, if so where? Wrong questions maybe. Where else? Still the wrong question.