I don't want people

Conversations about

#Arabella (16/04)

She perceives that as characters, so different characters
what's going on here?
funny/surreal
The colors of the French flag
She imagined a team of people working together, two characters : the first one tries to convince someone to do something. She perceives two texts and three actors, 2 of them are the boss.
I is super clear
II is hard to read, feels as the introduction of a new character
III She asks why are they overlapping?, may be -> HIERARCHIES AND POWER DYNAMICS?
The voice of the man feels serious and opaque

#Sara (17/04)

poco a poco me he ido dando cuenta de qué iban
que cosa tan violenta
y tan graciosa
el útlimo tine muchísima chicha
me gusta como has utilizado la polifonía
hay barullo, pero se sigue entendiendo
están muy bien sincronizadas las tres voces
es como una radionovela moderna
creo que me han violentado los primeros más, y me han recordado a conversaciones quehemos tendio acerca de charlas con hombres autoritarios y ser sumisas, o no

#Ine (17/04)

She feels an unity and a collision in the IV
She recommends Glen Gold, trilogy Up North, radio composition
First thing she imagined: a dialogue, monologue taked from a film, from cheap American movies, Wall Street kind of
She felt threatened to returned to a period she no longer believes on
She feels the entity, she feels the beginning and the end are very much connected: first and last chapter, you imagine a scene.
"I'm so happy I'm not in that world" she says
II Is this about people who don't listen to each other? but may be very literal
III Singing. The text might be about the circumstances of work, quite revolutionary. So may be this one is related to the first one, talking back
IV Echoing. He is talking and not seeing anything: about miscommunications
V She understands they were talking with him!

Then

About if I can or cannot work with this, yes absolutely yes, I don't have to worry. What's deep down in the text, what.

It is a beautiful text (!)

With the voices it feels colorful, the one voice is mono-color

#Rosella (17/04)

She says it is a parody of corporate speech. Voice speaking.
In II it feels playful, it feels a break, a peculiar effect
THE TEXT IS NOT REALLY GOING ANYWHERE, which combines well with the space which seems that doesn't have any kind of sense or reason.
What about the intentionality of the languages: WHY? is it a reference of this kind of thinking?
#REFERENCES: OULIPO experiment, RAYMOND QUENEAU: exercices in style

#Laura (17/04)

Material extraido de la realidad
Texto verosimil
Re-enactment
VIOLENCIA SOLAPADA - VIOLENTO Y FORMA ESTILISTICA - TOXICIDAD (es algo como un favor)
Sobre la voz, ella siente que necesita un actor, algo mas llevado al campo de la oralidad, que la lectura no es muy interesante. Mi voz suena mas encarnada, menos vulnerable.
Sobre el video de "OK" Ella siente que no es lo suficientemente elocuente
LA TECNOLOGIA TIENE GENERO
EL LENGUAJE COMO CAMPO DE OPRESION
ASUMIR

LENGUAJE: FASCINACION CON LA MANERA EN QUE LAS COSAS SON ENUNCIADAS, FUENTE LA TRANSCRIPCION EXACTA, LENGUAJE BANAL
CUESTIONES DE ACCESO
#REFERENCES: Joanna Hogg, Le souvenir / Marta Rosler, Semiotics of the kitchen, alteration del espacio domestico, Historia del cine de Goddard, el texto se vuelve imagen.

Reading magazines

Conversations about

# David (07/05)

He liked it, he smiled a lot

Very sculptural: a conversation about materials
He imagined that the "Ok, yes" belonged to a conversation in a photo shooting. He smiled a lot and said "everything is ok".

Advertising set a lifestyle and the video echoes that

CORRELATION 

How important is it? What do you want to talk about? De qué te gustaría hablar más?

About the voice in the back: he is aware that other conversation is taking place, the rhythm below is subtracted from a source that already exists. THE RHYTM is common with other practices.

I share with him my feelings when I find myself questioning the why of the project

My practice as a wide range practice with different approaches

This video is a conversation about not knowing: the idea of not knowing instead of a practice that need to be justified. Research based practice.

#Diana (07/05)

Trata de una etapa precisa: el francés lo sitúa en un momento y espacio de las grandes agencias fotográficas, también en el boom publicitario y económico de esa etapa

Con respecto al audio: le hace pensar en castings o en 

Hay una cuestión de adaptación de lo visual al audio. Piensa en un casting/fotografia

Audio servicial/obediente

Normas/canones. Hay una afirmación o una legitimación de normas previas: vision delimitada del mundo. Estética determinada.  Imaginario con todo lo que se quiere crear. 

- La dirección de la mirada en la sistematización/subordinación constante. 

- Crítica radical subordinada. (voz de hombre)

#Recommendations: 

Farocki: "El nacimiento de una imagen", "The advertising info", "Still life", "A day in the life of a consumer", "As you see".

Mariana Enríquez (elementos ideológicos?)

Hito Steryl: La imagen pobre.

- EXPLORAR A QUE IMAGINARIO ESTAS EXPUESTA, generando un deseo para ser legitimada. 

- IMAGINARIO DE UNA EPOCA ANTES QUE LO DIGITAL EXPLOTE.

Los textos con las imágenes funcionan bien como lenguaje paralelo. Cual es el nivel de reproducción de mensajes. 

Entendiendo mas a fondo qué -> desde el prisma del ahora -> qué implica narrar desde el hoy -> QUÉ IMPLICA

+ ensayistico, pero es experimental y es accesible.


(talk about iterations, forma de ensayo)

#SABINE (15/05)

- WHAT IS THE OFF-SCREEN REALITY? WHAT ABOUT THIS WORLD THAT WE DONT SEE?

- We see this woman is speaking for herself

The only real reference we have is "Power rangers"

Talking about generations, it seems that she speaks from the outer space

- TO PLAY WITH FRAMES OF REFERENCE

- Now it kind of feels like obvious and thick, like "hahaha" it is funny and easy to watch and compelling, but what else?

- What is the next step in a narrative mood, as it is now feels like fitting more in a installation.

#yo ahora estoy pensando en:

MARIANELA Y MY FAIR LADY
PIGMALION
Y
LOS TORREZNOS

Notes on

Marshall McLuhan argued “the word read means to guess – look it up in the big dictionary. Reading is an activity of rapid guessing because any word has so many meanings – including the word reading – that to select one in a context of other words requires very rapid guessing. That’s why a good reader tends to be a very quick decision-maker.”[1] This is very true of human reading, where multiple interpretations lead to various equivalent understandings of a text, but false when applied to machine reading, which only operates with predefined ways of interpreting text.

Image: "the word read means to guess" A quote from Marshall McLuhan during a live television broadcast, 1977

↑ McLuhan, M., Available at https://mcluhangalaxy.wordpress.com/2013/06/18/acute-abstruse-things-marshall-mcluhan-said-in-australia-in-1977/

Make it work Aitana

Contents

I don't want people

Conversations about

Reading magazines

Conversations about

Notes on

Recursos

Referencias

Marta Rosler (L)