User:Aitantv/Tuck & Ree (2013) A Glossary of Haunting

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
< User:Aitantv
Revision as of 20:47, 2 February 2023 by Aitantv (talk | contribs)

Tuck, E & Ree, C (2013) A Glossary of Haunting. Handbook of Autoethnography, edited by Stacey Holman Jones, Tony E. Adams, and Carolyn Ellis, pp639–658. Left Coast Press. (Download: http://www.evetuck.com/writing)

  • "In this case, the glossary appears without its host— perhaps because it has gone missing, or it has been buried alive, or because it is still being written. Maybe I ate it. It has an appendix, a remnant, which is its own form of haunting, its own lingering." (Tuck 2013 p640)
  • "This glossary is about justice, but in a sense that is rarely referenced. It is about righting (and sometimes wronging) wrongs; about hauntings, mercy, monsters, generational debt, horror films, and what they might mean for understanding settler colonialism, ceremony, revenge, and decolonization." (Tuck 2013 p640)
  • "Yet this glossary is a fractal; it includes the particular and the general, violating the terms of settler colonial knowledge which require the separation of the particular from the general, the hosted from the host, personal from the public, the foot(note) from the head(line), the place from the larger narrative of nation, the people from specific places." (Tuck 2013 p640)
  • On American horror: "the audience, are meant to feel outrage in the face of haunting, we are beckoned to root for the innocent hero, who could be us, because haunting is undeserved, even random. !e hero spends the length of the film righting wrongs, slaying the monster, burying the undead, performing the missing rite, all as a way of containment." (Tuck 2013 p641)
  • "Haunting, by contrast, is the relentless remembering and reminding that will not be appeased by settler society’s assurances of innocence and reconciliation.... Haunting doesn’t hope to change people’s perceptions, nor does it hope for reconciliation. Haunting lies precisely in its refusal to stop. Alien (to settlers) and generative for (ghosts), this refusal to stop is its own form of resolving. For ghosts, the haunting is the resolving, it is not what needs to be resolved." (Tuck 2013 p642)
  • "Haunting is the cost of subjugation. It is the price paid for violence, for genocide. Horror films in the United States have done viewers a disservice in teaching them that heroes are innocent, and that the ghouls are the trespassers. In the context of the settler colonial nation-state, the settler hero has inherited the debts of his forefathers." (Tuck 2013 p643)
  • "Erasure and defacement concoct ghosts; I don’t want to haunt you, but I will." (Tuck 2013 p643)
  • " " (Tuck 2013 p)
  • "" (Tuck 2013 p)
  • "" (Tuck 2013 p)
  • "" (Tuck 2013 p)
  • "" (Tuck 2013 p)
  • "" (Tuck 2013 p)
  • "" (Tuck 2013 p)
  • "" (Tuck 2013 p)
  • "" (Tuck 2013 p)
  • "" (Tuck 2013 p)
  • "" (Tuck 2013 p)
  • "" (Tuck 2013 p)
  • "" (Tuck 2013 p)
  • "" (Tuck 2013 p)
  • "" (Tuck 2013 p)
  • "" (Tuck 2013 p)