User:AvitalB/thesis/research/autoethnography

[https://www.jstor.org/stable/23032294?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Autoethnography&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DAutoethnography%26acc%3Don%26wc%3Don%26fc%3Doff%26group%3Dnone%26refreqid%3Dsearch%253A27e099803f20d1df18bd867555852bb5&ab_segments=0%2Fbasic_SYC-5187_SYC-5188%2F5188&refreqid=fastly-default%3A6a406061824a6007af2437ce29468a70&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents Autoethnography: An Overview / Carolyn Ellis, Tony E. Adams and Arthur P. Bochner] In the 80's scholars began to began challenging scientific research. The understanding of a connection between author, audience and texts and therefore a complexity of stories as a meaningful phenomena that introduced moral and ethics. These made helped people make sense of themselves and others. Researchers understood that subjectivity is almost impossible and that we should embrace the researcher influence on the research rather hiding it. A researcher can be influenced by an institute, personal circumstances, location, resources etc. Most conventional research methods are advocating a white, masculine, upper-middle class, christian perspective.