David 26/09/13 & David 03/10/13
Recap from the tutorials with David
task_| 26.09.13
"I would like you to write your own personal manifesto. What do you think (your) art** can or should achieve? I'm interested in your reasons, opinions and views. You can be radical, address wider issues if you wish, but please remain honest."
other than sit on its ass in a museum….
….I am for art that is flipped on and off with a switch.
Asked to write own manifesto ( or what our work manifests) I came up with the following ( very much provoked by the quotes above):
I am for art that can trigger.
or can leave a trace of (in the memory)
I am for art that can survive/ inhabit a space outside the museum / the white box.
in parallel the theater outside the black box.
I am for art that asks questions …(?) or draw a map of invisible ( the critical ME ) or leave you speechless…(the visual ME).
I am for art that allow you to participate involve you as a viewer / user / abuser. ----- more on that
The art of participation, elaborates collectivist rather than individual consumption.
I am for art that is not for the elite / privileged / the curators / the art critics / art for artists. / art for the sake of art.
following by interesting discussion on what does define/ deferentialize the difference between Fine arts from Media program in PZI ?or what is MEDIA DESIGN? we came with the conclusion that they both refer to the same questions: How do you communicate the work? What is the subject of your work? or what and how you find a subject of the work you are making?
// media field forms a third area - serves as a democratic aria where the form of the final work is shaped and contextualized, unfolding the research topic.
==
David 03/10/13
Time for show and tell--->David's feedback:
Start producing.( practice based ) forming your own voice in terms of pushing the idea to the unique personal approach.
form a personal dialog
reference work on the surveillance Jill Magid Evidence_ Locker