User:Ssstephen/thesisoutline
thesis outline
overly confident abstract
… h a s a n y o n e e v e r a s k e d y o u t h e q u e s t i o n : w h y a r e y o u h e r e s t e p h e n ? t h e y a s k e d m e a n d I ' m s t a r t i n g t o f o r m a b i t o f a n o p i n i o n o n t h e m a t t e r . I t ' s s l o w b u t i t ' s c e r t a i n l y f o r m i n g . B u t i w i l l f i g h t t o k e e p i t a m o r p h o u s t h i s t i m e , u n s t r a t i f i e d , w e l l t i l l e d . I w i l l d i g a r o u n d i n i t a c t i v e l y a n d p l a y w i t h i t . B u t i n t h e m e s s a n d c o n f u s i o n i t ' s o k t o i d e n t i f y o r d e s c r i b e . N o t l i k e L i n n a e u s b u t l i k e l y i n g i n t h e g r a s s m a k i n g s t o r i e s f r o m t h e c l o u d s . T h a t o n e l o o k s l i k e t h e g r i d s h a v e b e e n t a k e n a w a y . T h a t o n e l o o k s l i k e a p o e m , i t s a y s ; c o n s c i o u s l y , w i t h l o v e , c a r i n g a n d c a r e f u l . T h a t o n e a r o u n d t h e s u n l o o k s l i k e a g r e e n l i o n . T h a t o n e l o o k s w a i t w h e r e d i d i t g o , i t ' s c o m p l e t e l y e s c a p e d n o t e v e n a c l o u d a n y m o r e . A n d n o w w e ' r e l y i n g w h e r e t h e c l o u d s w e r e , d i s s o l v e d , f a l l i n g , f l y i n g . T h e r e ' s a n i r o n y i n a b l a c k s m i t h w h o w a n t s t o g i v e u p c o n t r o l . A n d t h e s h a m a n t r y i n g t o d o t h e s a m e . M e a n w h i l e t h e i r b r o t h e r t h e p r i n c e h a s n e v e r b e e n a b l e t o c o n t r o l t h e m . T h e t r i c k i s t o r e m o v e t h e v i e w p o i n t o f c y b e r n e t i c s e n t i r e l y . W h e r e w i l l t h i s t o o l f l o w t o ? W h a t i s t h i s s t r a n g e n e w d a n c e , I k i n d a l i k e i t ? D o y o u w a n t t o p l a y a g a m e w i t h u s ? O h I l i k e y o u r p i c t u r e c a n y o u t e a c h m e h o w t o d r a w l i k e t h a t ? I ' m t r y i n g t o w o r k o u t a w a y t o m a k e g r a p h i c d e s i g n w i t h o u t a n d t h a t c a n e s c a p e f r o m a n d t h a t i m a g i n e s o t h e r w i s e . I d o n ' t r e a l l y l i k e s o m e o f t h i s w o u l d i t b e o k i f I m a d e a f o r k ? D o y o u h a v e c o f f e e h e r e ? I f I m a d e a p o t w o u l d a n y o n e h a v e s o m e ? I s t h i s p r a c t i c e s u s t a i n a b l e ? C a n w e m a k e i t b e s o m e h o w , i t m i g h t b e a b i t l e s s s t r e s s f u l t h e n ? W h a t h a p p e n s i f I p l u g t h i s i n h e r e ? I t ' s a b o u t i n t e g r a t i o n a n d c o m b i n i n g p a r t s t h a t w e r e p r e v i o u s l y d e f i n e d a s s e p a r a t e . E v e r y t h i n g i s g o i n g t o b e f i n e , t h a t ' s w h y i t s c a l l e d r e f i n i n g. E v e n t u a l l y i f y o u s m a s h u p a l l t h e s h a r d s e n o u g h t h e y w i l l f l o w l i k e s a n d . H a v e y o u e v e r b e e n t o M u r v a g h b e a c h t h e s a n d i s s o f i n e …
terminology
To de-sign design, I will assign a sign:
⊞
Divided. Square. Equilateral. Gridded. Structured. Compartmentalised. In the land surveying of the roman empire, a tool called the groma was used to measured and split the land: north to south, east to west. Conquered. A basis for a military camp, or a trading village. The territory becomes the map. Normung bringt Ordnung. But René was also a dreamer and a mystic. Grids and magic squares have been used for a long time as a medium with magical powers. What about the designer as shaman, potter, or sacred smith? Someone who embues objects with power. ⊞ seems so rigid and structured but it's convoluted, full of magic and freedom even in maths. Even maths can escape. I'd like to take my shapes back now thank you.
overly confident abstract, but slightly more tangible this time
This paper explores the compartmentalisations I find intra- and inter- personally in my life, in particular as they relate to the "profession" / "practice" / "field" / "whatever" of ⊞, the ⊞er. It documents examinations of these and explorations of ways to cross apparent categories and boundaries. It dissolves and reintegrates. The text is about the discipline and potential to be undisciplined, or transdisciplinary, but that's not as exciting. It is about living life within particular working conditions, a point or points in social economic and cultural webs, becoming aware of this location and exploring new imaginaries of relating practices and people. I tell my story through autoethnographic documentation, reflection, academic reference and positioning, description of new connections I have made and am making that may or may not be technological/tool-based, imaginative ravings.
Outline three key issues you want to explore.
- What is a ⊞er and what is the act of ⊞? (reflexive mode, contextual, multiple lenses. What compartments and boundaries exist, why are they there what do they do, what do they prevent). I would like this to be based on various modes of describing, examining and understanding. It is not about one practice but the reality of being more as a person than one practice. An example that a life doesnt fit into categories neatly. Being aware of my white gmt male position also and the privileges that allow me to flow between these categories and occupy this much space.
- What can a ⊞ be and what can the act of ⊞ be? (imaginative and description of practice: tools and breaking boundaries of disciplines, destructuring my self). Again it is not about this one category. From the observations in the first question and the growing awareness that will hopefully come from this, making tools and work that cross structural boundaries. It is an anticapitalist action as it is about disclosing what has been enclosed. As a human this is my time and my space. Again I'm aware not everyone has the freedom to do this and I would like to draw attention to that.
- Where else can these categories be opened and shattered and bridged and dissolved? (imaginative and description of practice: interpersonal and collaborative, destructuring society). Some of the boundaries are interpersonal rather than within or solvable by one person. I think structural issues will appear in the research of the first issue about division of labour as well as class stratification of society. Similar to the second part I hope I can find ways to bridge or break or seep through the walls.