Kamo 🍲
From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
- WORK IN PROJESS
- Super nice project.
-
I like how we take care of each other, it is something new for me in the context of a
collective project.
- The attention to the group's pace was something really precious.
- The exchange of knowledge
- Self organized workshops, something we should do more and regularly!
- Developing software that suits us
- Check in moments
- A lot of meetings
- A lot of meetings
- Communication is difficult.
- We should explore more the idea of a shared glossary
- Even if misunderstandings are nice sometimes and lead to unexpected outcomes
- Self directed project: i like it, but at some point difficult
- I mean like in the real world
- Cristina: helped a lot during decision making
- Cristina: super high quality contents and approaches
- 👹 & 👺: constantly raising the level.
- 👹 & 👺: Continously questioning industry' standards
-
👹 & 👺: We arrived with some grazy ideas and they replied with something even grazier
-
👹 & 👺: Super stimulating to prototype something and then they showed how to do the
same thing but with a more horizontal, accessible and inclusive approach
-
👹 & 👺: we need more prototyping hours, or organized differently. Once in a week is not
really ideal. What about split in 2?
- Steve: nice writing exercises they were super helpful
-
During the excercise for writing the manifesto I had my headphones on listening to ? and
at some point I was super focused writing and I heard at the same time the music and the
silence in the room. It was really an ecstatic moment.
- Not read enough tho, I was too much into exploring and doing things
-
Reading session with Erica and Mitsa at the beginning. Was nice we should do it
regularly
- Clara's lecture was my fav: thank you
- Angeliki and Wordmord were great
- Danny was intresting
-
Simon was intresting but the timing of the lesson totaly wrong, really hard to focus
right after lunch & the meeting
- Really liked the iterative process of develop—share—adapt things
- Even if sometimes it hurt
- the joy of digital DIY
- the pain of digital DIY
- Our API was something like an ecosystem: messy, exotic, vernacular
- And im really happy about it
- technology as a social and shared space
- I worked with the most of us
- But not with everyone
- The right idea landed 10 days late
- But it couldn't be otherwise I think
-
Ideas arrive always at the right moment, what we could do while waiting it's just setup
the environment
-
Maybe it's easier to begin and adjust the direction meanwhile, rather than being
stubborn on everything being clear and perfect from the start
-
It's true that choosing a format at the beginning could be helpful, but at the same time
the ideal medium for something could not be chosen in advance
- It's also true that constraining ourselves since the beginning it's stimulating
- And helps to focus
- I like how slowly we got all together to the idea of the API
- Sometimes I was afraid of pushing things to much!
- It was not easy to trust each other but really rewarding
- Trusting each other in the process of work is also a way to manage energies better
- I like to rely on others for things I'm really not good at
- But i found out is nice also for things I'm good at
- Because in the end the result feels more shared, and with plural voices
- Sharing expertise
-
Visual Identity outcomes were not really my thing at the beginning and I was a bit
panicking, because I'm super sensible and conditioned by visual outcomes.
- But at the end I got to like the direction and I was super happy with the result.
-
Even if I'm still not really sure about the text indent, doesn't it feel a bit messy in
the website?
- We aimed super high
-
But there were moments in which i felt to slow down everyone because of technical
issues. Sorry
- Technical issues always slow down the work
-
Actually this is a constant of working with technology, so not really a problem. More an
epistemic thing. The borders of a project are its technical issues? Woa mr F. this is so
dryyy have a break pls
- Technical issues: prompt new perspective on how to do things
-
Setting up the infrastructure for the special issue at the end required a lot of time
- I would have preferred to focus more on the actual contents
- Because it is true that we worked with the politics of access to our materials etc
-
But at the end the most of materials were left out ah ah and this is a pity because they
were super intresting things