((in)ter)dependence
To be inextricably linked, in a way that is impossible to disentangle.
((in)ter)dependency tree
interdependence inter ──┘ └── independence in ──┘-------------------------┘ └── dependence
┌─────────────────────┐ ─┴─ ─────────┴───────── ( ( i n ) t e r ) d e p e n d e n c e ───────┬─────── ─────────┬───────── └──────────────────┘
inter
▚ Prefix: Used to form adjectives meaning "between or among the people, things, or places mentioned" ▞
┌ between; among; in the midst │ ├ reciprocal; reciprocally │ ├ located between │ ├ carried on between │ ├ occurring between │ ├ intervening │ ├ shared by, involving, or derived from two or more │ ├ between the limits of : within │ └ existing between
in
░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ <-- you are often not here ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░ outside ░ in ░ <-- isolated └───but instead in the space ░ between ░ categories ░ ░ topologies ░ ░ ░ ░ <-- apart from ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░ ░ ░ <-- inside of ░ ░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ the space between categories is erased ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░
independence
The state of wanting or being able to do things for yourself and make your own decisions, without help or influence from other people.
dependence
when you can't go about it on your own └┅when you need┅┅┅┅┅┅to lean on┅┅┅┅depend on┅┅┅┅rely on┅┅survive with ┏┅others┅┅loved ones┅┅strangers┅┅groups┅┅communities ┇ ┗┅resources┅┅material┅┅substantial┅┅substances┅┅help┅┅support┅┅mutual aid ┏┅immaterial structures┅┅coping mechanisms┅┅ ┇ ┗┅abstract systems┅┅┅┅┅┅┅┅┅┅┅┅┅┓ ┇ ┇ ┇ ┇ of education of justice ┛ ┇ ┇ ┗ of support of health ┛ ┗ of care
Borderlands and Monsters
Communities of Practise
Appears in Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology (Susan Leigh Star, 1994, find it here on the bootleg library), that builds on the concept from Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (Lave and Wenger, 1992).
A community of practise... ... is composed of people and things, themselves in ecological relation...> > > check ecological relations ... as a term emphasizes the ways in which people work together and act together to form communities ... is a way of talking about a linked web of actions, people, and artifacts
Objects in a community of practise... ... come to be only in the context and action and use ... exhibit a level of familiarity, 'taken-for-grantedness' ... are on a trajectory of naturalization ─┬─────────────┬───────────── │ └ the removal of contingencies of an object's creation and its situated nature │ [first computer rolls around and we're all Really aware of it but now smartphones are │ just a part of us, they have become naturalized, a part of our lives │ and the landscape, it's historical context is no longer that important] └ it is not predetermined an object will ever become naturalized or how long it will remain so
People in a community of practise... ... are considered 'newcomer' not through their relation with other people in the community but through their relation with the objects in the community ... are on a trajectory of membership ───────────────────────────────── (which ranges from illegitimate peripheral participation to full membership) that consists of a series of encounters with the objects in the community and increasingly being in a naturalized relationship with them
Ecological Relations
Those interactions that are analysed by Social ecology, the study of how individuals interact with and respond to the environment around them, and how these interactions affect society and the environment as a whole. So are those systems where ecological relations are highly taken into account those that have a deep interconnected connection between society, their members and the ecosystem that is formed around them?
We look at the text[1] again, page 152. Editorial team member C is taking notes. A: Could you break this question down? B: which one? A: 'So are ... around them?' B: I googled: where [noisenoisenoise] C: Sorry I missed it, the explanation B: Me as well aaah All: hahaha B: Where people care a lot about building a good environment. Togetherness. Flexible in relationships.
So could it be that social-ecological systems are those that are more flexible? \can absord better turbolescences. Are they less vulnerable as systems, do they accept their vulnerabilities?
A: So those ecological systems are more flexible than other systems? B: Yes? A: The last question I don't fully understand, because it starts with a statement. B: I found this piece that talked about social problems, vulnerabilities... Ecological means that as well, talking about vulnerabilities and care... I think I should write hours and hours to get a really good explanation.
In the text ecological relations emerge as the author describes her point of view of what information is, in the context of feminist method, and connected to the communities of practices.
So ecological relations within the communities of practice, communities where people work in cooperation to form groups
Digging into the meaning of the term "ecologically" we see how it can mean taking everything, every aspect of an outcome into account.
A: I really like the last sentence, 'how it can mean taking everything, every aspect of an outcome into account'. Maybe we can put it on top or somehow highlight it...
- ↑ Star, S.L. (2016) 'Misplaced concretism and concrete situations: feminism, method, and information technology,' in The MIT Press eBooks, pp. 143–168. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10113.003.0009.