Claudio's Thesis - INTRO/OUTRO
Claudio's Thesis - INTRO/OUTRO SteveSuggests
First draft of INTRO (first chapter of the thesis)
things to reconsider in the structure of my thesis
(title)
remove flashes (?)
BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRACES, FLICKERS AND FAILURES
First draft of INTRO (first chapter of the thesis)
This text is titled INTRO.
INTRO is a general outline of the starting point of my graduation research project, BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES. It will present its premises, its pinciples, the thematic fields that the project will cross and address, the questions driving it, the tools I plan to use, the attitudes I will rely on.
INTRO is a self-analyisis of where I am at right now. Now that I have written my Project Proposal and I am starting to grasp what I am making yet I feel much will change and evolve and I still have many doubts to figure out. Also, it will serve me as an exercise to reach a temporary state of clarity over the next month and devise an effective and convincing way to present and frame my intentions at the assessment in January.
I will write another text - OUTRO - just before the final due date for thesis. It will be a complementary, mirror text to INTRO, an attempt at recapping the work made and reflecting on its achievements and failures, its discoveries and future trajectories. Also, a more detailed description of the form that this project will take in the graduation show.
BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES is a visual research project that I will carry on over the coming months, towards the graduation. During the first year I focused on a rather broad yet quite specific field of research, which I would frame as the theory and practice of image-making, and, conversely, of the experience of images, considered in their complex implications - technological/technical, material, semiotic, affective/existential - between their digital and analog nature. In other words, I have been concerned with the conditions of possibility of images by constantly lingering on their limits. This project belongs to the same research path. It's an attempt at reaching its core and making it more radical both in content and form.
BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES will be an elemental exploration of fundamental questions about seeing and being: the way we see, what we see, why we see, and where we stand. It will give form to a critical discourse and practice that weaves together and questions the experience of the world by seeing it, through light, on images and screens, the materiality of these - as physical/analog and virtual/digital objects, and the related quest to find meaning and stand in between these, living the tension between nihilism and the sublime. A personal reflection on the experience of seeing as well as a (self)reflection on the possibilities of the medium of (moving) images.
BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES will take the form of a cumulative, open-ended, expansive work on visual material from different sources and with different qualities. Its subjects will be piercing light leaks and dark black holes, over- and under- exposed shots, blinding flashes and fast flickers, windows, curtains, screens, eyes, pixels, digital noise, black and white blank frames [tbc...], collected and choreographed together in short, stand-alone sketches/fragments.
An annotation process will run parallel, unfolding meaning in written form, producing text material that will end up in this thesis work and in the final piece for the graduation show.
BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES will find its outcome at the graduation show as an experimental moving image work, in an installation form. I envision it either as a single-screen compilation or a multi-channel installation comprising of (4?) speculative episodes/parts.
moved the text about the piece I made last year on another page. I am thinking to use it as a separate part of the thesis. maybe I should mention it here in INTRO
(WHAT) I'M INTERESTED IN (WHAT) (COULD this also evolve into a separate CHAPTER OF THE THESIS?)
Here I try to write down, in simple sentences, what I am interested in, as an artist.
I try to define the field in which i am moving. As I often struggle to clearly understand and therefore explain what I'm interested in, what and why I make, I will commit to an exercise of repeatedly writing short paragraphs trying to pinpoint the .
I’m interested in exploring the fundamental elements and conditions of vision, its limits and the notion of blindness in relation to images and image-making.
I’m interested in light and its double potential to make things visible and to make blind. Its absence and presence, its double effects on images and vision. To drown in light, or to emerge from it. To appear and conceal. To make the world exist, or vanish.
I'm interested in the fine line between visibility and invisibility, between transparency and opacity.
I'm interested in those liminal moments when nothing (or everything) is seen as something, or when something that can't be seen becomes nothing. Things becoming nothing, something, everything in and through light, in and trough images.
I'm interested in exploring the liminal states between seeing something, everything, nothing.
I'm interested in the paradoxical link between nihilism and the sublime.
I'm interested in explore the tension between pure abstraction and mere materiality of images, between representation of the world and presentation of the medium, between seeing everything and not seeing anything.
I’m interested in images and screens as supports for such paradoxical coexistence of showing and hiding.
I'm interested in the concept of blind spot. Ocular blind spots in retinal structures; blind(ing) elements in the "structure" of images (over/under exposures, out-of-focus, flickering ...); images and screens as blind objects; also, blind spots in perception of the world.
I'm interested in exploring light as a flash. The flash of light as a concept, an image, and a physical phenomenon. The flash as the basic unit of light; as a (im)pulse for/on vision. As a singular, sudden event of extreme light that paradoxically reveals and blinds. As a device for apparition and concealment, of existence and negation. As a metaphor and image for both nihilism and the sublime. Also, the flash as the fundament of every experience of moving images, and of digital screens too.
The failure of images is another key notion I'm interested in. The paradox of making fail-ed/-ing images as part of my image-making practice as a visual artist. I'm interested in exploring and working on events of failure of images. Failed images as images that question and subvert their expected representative value. Images that represents nothing-ness, that show themselves as images, that are blind and that blind the viewer, both physically and conceptually.
Hereafter, I compile an expansive list of keywords that are somehow called into question by BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES. I will consider translating it into a conceptual diagram/map to give a visual sense of their mutual implications, their relevance and position in the project. This list is a prelude to another part of this thesis (A CATALOG/COMPENDIUM OF CONCEPTS), which will further and deeper elaborate on some of these notions in closer relation to the actual development of the project over the coming months.
seeing/not seeing
showing/hiding
seeing/watching/staring/gazing
vision/blindness
visibility/invisibility
transparency/opacity
representation
materiality/abstraction
edges/borders/thresholds/margins/limits/interfaces
errors-glitches-artifacts-failures
flashes, flickers
immateriality-materiality in/of (digital) images
blind spots
gaze/image/screenphisicality of images and image-making devices
lenses, sensors, screens, human eye structures
software/hardware, digital/analog, virtual/physical
technology/the technicalexistentialism, nihilism/sublime
A SET OF TOOLS AND ATTITUDES AKA HOW I WANT TO WORK
In working on BLIND SPOTS, LIGHT TRICKS/TRACES, FLASHES AND FAILURES, I plan to set for myself a set of limited tools and attitudes
fragmented sketching - work against the fetish of the final piece
redundancy/repetition/variation
sculptural attitude
exercises in seeing. for me while making, for the viewer watching
TOOLS / SELF IMPOSED LIMITATIONS
black and white
simple images
two channels of edting (4 tracks in total in davinci + 1 adj layer) - keep the editing tricks simple
film 16mm?
sound?
there s something with
deepness and flatness
surface of the screen and its movement, its rupture
holes in surfaces
modules/units and structures/patterns/repetitions
redundancy to articulate tensions
use of a simple, reduced, minimal language
short video fragments, still images (often screenshots from somewhere else)
editing / post production techniques as ways of layering new meaning on appropriated imagery
lo-fi, DIY attitude
black and white / monochrome / grayscales
structural elements and devices of (mostly digital) images and image-making (pixel grids, screens)
(video) loop form.
minimalism
reduction
abstraction
. description - tautology - self-reflection
embrace an approach to images that is more sculptural and open-ended - a DIY, constant sketching, “non-finito” approach. Produce rapid, rough, short sketches, yet consistently, as a body of short fragments whose meaning is made by their whole. It is the way of working that I feel more at ease with and I believe it can be the most effective one in exploring and reaching the core topics and interests of my artistic work. I want to work with images in a more dirty, reckless, less polished way. Also, while I’m still interested in using found footage, I would like to work more substantially behind the lens, making and working with my own images too.
Through a work of annotation, reflection and speculation, I will progressively track its unfolding and draw connections to those theoretical and artistic references that lay in the background of my work. In line with the open and explorative nature of the project, references and links will come up along the way. However, as a starting point, I will refer to two main fields of theory. On one side, media theory, visual studies, semiotics, aesthetics, theories of images, screens, of vision/visual perception/gaze. On the other side, I will reflect on influences from minimal and conceptual art tradition, structural filmmaking from the 60s/70s, as well as more contemporary moving image artists.
WHERE I'M AT RIGHT NOW AKA WHAT I'M MAKING WHILE WRITING THIS TEXT
FEW LINES, NOT MUCH,it's already too long text
working digitally right now, plan to transition to 16mm from january, trying to figure out the workflow for that
working to produce something concrete for the assessment already
considering the place that text and sound will have, necessity of a narrative of some sort / how and to what extent give information to audience.
MANY DOUBTS, THE BIGGEST ONE:
IS THIS TOO FORMALISTIC, TOO SELF REFERENTIAL, NOT INTEREESTING, NOT SAYING ANYTHING ON THE EXTERNAL WORLD OUT THERE? IS IT JUST FORM WITHOUG T CONTENT - THIS IS WHAT DAVID IS WARNING ME ABOUT
- HOW CAN I MAKE IT MORE APPEALING, MORE RELATABLE FOR AN AUDIENCE, HOW CAN I FIND ENTRY POINTS FOR OTHERS?
(END OF INTRO)
1. A brief presentation of the project - title, topics, tools (from PP)
2. A reading of an epiphanic moment in my practice last year that I recognize as a significant starting point of this project (new text)
3. What i'm interested in exploring now. A manifesto (for myself) of interests and intentions. Written as a loose, expansive list of things I'm interested in dealing with. (already in PP + expand with new text)
4. How I want to work. A set of tools and attitudes (from PP mainly but expand with new text).
5. Where I'm at now / What I'm doing right now (from PP mainly but expand with new text)