BACK TO AITANA
#Arabella (16/04)
She perceives that as characters, so different characters
what's going on here?
funny/surreal
The colors of the French flag
She imagined a team of people working together, two characters : the first one tries to convince someone to do something. She perceives two texts and three actors, 2 of them are the boss.
I is super clear
II is hard to read, feels as the introduction of a new character
III She asks why are they overlapping?, may be -> HIERARCHIES AND POWER DYNAMICS?
The voice of the man feels serious and opaque
#Sara (17/04)
poco a poco me he ido dando cuenta de qué iban
que cosa tan violenta
y tan graciosa
el útlimo tine muchísima chicha
me gusta como has utilizado la polifonía
hay barullo, pero se sigue entendiendo
están muy bien sincronizadas las tres voces
es como una radionovela moderna
creo que me han violentado los primeros más, y me han recordado a conversaciones quehemos tendio acerca de charlas con hombres autoritarios y ser sumisas, o no
#Ine (17/04)
She feels an unity and a collision in the IV
She recommends Glen Gold, trilogy Up North, radio composition
First thing she imagined: a dialogue, monologue taked from a film, from cheap American movies, Wall Street kind of
She felt threatened to returned to a period she no longer believes on
She feels the entity, she feels the beginning and the end are very much connected: first and last chapter, you imagine a scene.
"I'm so happy I'm not in that world" she says
II Is this about people who don't listen to each other? but may be very literal
III Singing. The text might be about the circumstances of work, quite revolutionary. So may be this one is related to the first one, talking back
IV Echoing. He is talking and not seeing anything: about miscommunications
V She understands they were talking with him!
Then
About if I can or cannot work with this, yes absolutely yes, I don't have to worry. What's deep down in the text, what.
It is a beautiful text (!)
With the voices it feels colorful, the one voice is mono-color
#Rosella (17/04)
She says it is a parody of corporate speech. Voice speaking.
In II it feels playful, it feels a break, a peculiar effect
THE TEXT IS NOT REALLY GOING ANYWHERE, which combines well with the space which seems that doesn't have any kind of sense or reason.
What about the intentionality of the languages: WHY? is it a reference of this kind of thinking?
#REFERENCES: OULIPO experiment, RAYMOND QUENEAU: exercices in style
#Laura (17/04)
Material extraido de la realidad
Texto verosimil
Re-enactment
VIOLENCIA SOLAPADA - VIOLENTO Y FORMA ESTILISTICA - TOXICIDAD (es algo como un favor)
Sobre la voz, ella siente que necesita un actor, algo mas llevado al campo de la oralidad, que la lectura no es muy interesante. Mi voz suena mas encarnada, menos vulnerable.
Sobre el video de "OK" Ella siente que no es lo suficientemente elocuente
LA TECNOLOGIA TIENE GENERO
EL LENGUAJE COMO CAMPO DE OPRESION
ASUMIR
LENGUAJE: FASCINACION CON LA MANERA EN QUE LAS COSAS SON ENUNCIADAS, FUENTE LA TRANSCRIPCION EXACTA, LENGUAJE BANAL
CUESTIONES DE ACCESO
#REFERENCES: Joanna Hogg, Le souvenir / Marta Rosler, Semiotics of the kitchen, alteration del espacio domestico, Historia del cine de Goddard, el texto se vuelve imagen.
#yo ahora estoy pensando en:
MARIANELA
PIGMALION
Y
LOS TORREZNOS
