User:)biyibiyibiyi(/RW&RM 04/thesis outline sesh3

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki

Introduction

Background

Variations of P2P production, parallel to and as alternative to centralized services. Open source, global commons maker culture taking place around the world, originated in Silicon Valley as new forms of enabling new forms of science citizens and to democratize technology. Open source culture that take place around in different parts of the world pertain to different characteristics, there shouldn't be a dominating homogeneity in open source maker culture. maker culture in economical precarity. communities of experimental publishing making ways of making things public as gestures of decentralization and transparent porous making.

Thesis Statement

Contemporary phenomenons of centralization and decentralization found root in development of network culture, counter culture in 60s and 70s. Critical examination on old media can shed light on contemporary practices.

Body

First topic: Examination of P2P production, does p2p provides infrastructural possibility

examples overview of P2P infrastructure, various kinds.

examples of how P2P is used in various instances, look into Dat and Beaker browser in more details. And Torrents.

But does it grant a productive commons, or does it re-iterate principles of capitalism, such as BitCoin mining?

Bit Coin mining costs significant energy and resources.

Culture of geek masculinity in competitive problem solving scenario.

Origins of network media may shed light on how we conduct and practice decentralization/DIY hacking.

The rise of the Net needs to be rooted in the 1960s, in both the "closed world" of the Cold War and the open and decentralized world of the antiwar movement and the counter culture. Understanding these dual origins enables us to better understand current controversies over whether the Internet will be "open" or "closed", over whether the Net will foster democratic dialogue or centralized hierarchy, community or capitalism, or some mixture of both.

Origins of Networking implied centralized communication

ARPAnet

I DON'T KNOW

Counter culture, computer lib, homebrew computer club, usernet

talk the examples, I need to look more into them and I don't know now.

Supporting evidence

mixture of both

example here

example here

Inventing means and modus operandi for decentralized publishing

definition of decentralized publishing

shadow libraries

Open Source Publishing

Homogeneity of maker culture originated in Silicon Valley

Shanzhai

<?>

III. Conclusion

1. Summarize the main points of your paper and Restate your thesis in fresh words.2.Make a stong/memorable final statement

proposal outline

What do you want to make?

Before making, I want to address the implications and reasons of adopting certain formats, as I consider the formats taking a decisive roles in the project;s investigation, presentation and distribution. Think of water in different form of containers that may suggest their different types of use. I am interested in producing, presenting and distributing my research in formats that carry a distributive, participatory nature, such as hybrid publications, zines, and participatory events. I see these formats as a way to share, invite, interject discourses in an open, public field, as a way to instigate collective critical making.

My research topic is reflective of why I conduct my research in the aforementioned formats, or vice versa. I am interested in contemporary practices of DIY hacktivism, networking, infrastructures, and the topics' antecedent transformations in the lens of media archaeology. Additionally, I am also intrigued about the alterations the research will cause, when I situate it in the context of rising urbanism and technological transformation in contemporary China.

I want to create distributive work that stimulate inquiry to DIY making and alternative networks, both contemporarily and archaeologically.

How do you plan to make it?

I will conduct research in DIY hacktivism, maker movement, zine culture, hybrid publishing and experimental publishing culture.

How do you plan to make it?

I will conduct research in DIY hacktivism, maker culture and media archaeology. Annotation on garnered bibliography is a good tool to relate literature to initiate my prototypes.

I am also interested in the medium of "blogging", to write in articles of blogs to form a hands on research project. The blog can include theoretical research, how-to manuals, news about the project, etc.

As for prototypes, I am more sure about producing publishing prototypes, but I am not very sure about prototypes that exist in other forms (retro networking device, for example. I recently found out about this topic but I haven't had experience prototyping with retro devices.)

What is your time table?

September - making hackpacts, gathering bibliography and making annotations.

October - making larger prototypes and become more decicive and lucid towards how to use the bibliographies.

November - continue works in October. In November will (?) participate in WORM zine fest, it will be a good opportunity to reflect on the previous small publishing projects.

December - temporary wrap up and prepare for assessment

January – prepare to enrich the thesis

February – Thesis writing and prototyping

March – Thesis writing and prototyping

April – Submission of thesis and embark on graduation project prototyping

May - Graduation project prototyping

June - Graduation project prototyping

Why do you want to make it?

because, to decentralize is to 1. collaborate 2. offer porosity 3. corroborate 4. stanch 5. speculate 6. combat imperialism 7. combat orientalism 8. expose 9.localize 10. contextualize 11. play 12. temporalize

Sonia comment: this is quite powerful to read and please explain more!

I will expand this motivation to a speculative manifesto

Who can help you and how?

Alternative Network community has many documentation and writings.

Relation to previous practice

{}

Relation to larger context

On infrastructure and networking: critique towards infrastructure centralization, demystifying infrastructures, decentralization, network typology.

On Experimental Publishing: hybrid publishing, rewriting of codes of conduct, user manuals, terms of service.

On decentralization: P2P protocols, communities such as DAT and Scuttlebut.

References:

Rosenzweig, R. (1998). Wizards, Bureaucrats, Warriors, and Hackers: Writing the History of the Internet. The American Historical Review, 103(5), 1530-1552. doi:10.2307/2649970

Hacking with Chinese Characteristics: The Promises of the Maker Movement against China's Manufacturing Culture

Bauwens,M.,Kostakis,V.andPazaitis,A.2019.PeertoPeer:TheCommonsManifesto. Pp. 33–45. London: University of Westminster Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/ book33.c. License: CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0

Anarchive as technique in the Media Archaeology Lab | building a one Laptop Per Child mesh network