Interfacing the law 2019

Pirate libraries, shadow libraries, piratical text collections, amateur digital libraries, peer produced libraries and how to read them together.

Letter 1: In solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-Hub
Letter 2: Alexandra Elbakyan to Mr. Robert W. Sweet
Letter 3: Dear participants in Interfacing the law!

WORKSHOP WITH FEMKE

Thursday 18 April

11:00 Intro: m-e-t-h-o-d-o-l-o-g-i-e-s (or not)
11:15 Q + Q
12:00 Response-ability
13:00 Lunch / move to Museumpark
14:00 Phenomenal cartography
15:30 s\p\e\l\l\i\n\g and/or Diffractive reading and/or Renaming|reframing
17:00 Feedback + next session

Download kit: m-e-t-h-o-d-o-l-o-g-i-e-s (or not)

Workshop with Bodo Balasz

text

text

text

text

text

text

Travel to Riedveld Library

https://pad.constantvzw.org/p/rietveld_library
http://catalogue.rietveldacademie.nl/about.html

Workshop with Eva Weynmayr

Borrowing / Poaching / Plagiarising / Pirating / Stealing / Gleaning / Referencing / Leaking / Copying / Imitating / Adapting / Faking / Paraphrasing / Quoting / Reproducing / Using / Counterfeiting / Repeating / Translating / Cloning / Silencing / Editing / Omitting / Reducing / Appending / Redirecting / Recontextualising / Focusing / (Faithfully) Reproducing / Caring / Reformatting / Bootlegging / Reframing / Retracing

BOOK 1 — Feminism/Postmodernism

Reproducing (but not exactly.) Producing again - not reproducing. improving materiality (imposition, bindng), adding value
Localizing
Crafting

This book was photocopied and assembled in a copy store, when asked by a client not imitating, or copying. the design of the cover is clearly different. it doesn't try to reproduce perfectly, or faking it. There are design decisins made. Spine writing updide down. (recultured)

What is the price of these books? What is the price of a reprodution? Original book: 35dollars, in amazon.us

Cover

Wouldn't it be easy to photocopy the whole cover? It was a choice to only have the title and other elements, probably took more time if they had to use a paper to hide the other elements in the photocopy machine. Back cover is also very different: no information about the author, or short biography. the emphasis on the author is removed.

Spine

Authoratitive book has title from top to bottom. Reproduced one has from bottom to top. it's crafted. (Crafting)

Format

Printed Size, Paper, Binding are slighly different. deliberate decision: bit smaller size than A5: maybe they chose this size of their convenience for printing?

Digital copy from LibGen:

The cover is same The contents are photocopied. There is no Back-cover.

In the authoritative copy there's a paper reminding the person who borrowed the book to put it back, this in 2004.

BOOK 2 — A Room of One's Own

Adapting
Caring
Adding
Quoting
Inserting
influencing
opinioning
bringing into conversation
layering
merging

marginal notes, very simillar approach with the annotated text we were doing in Steve's class How many people were involved?

You can see the photocopy marks.

The notes are all readable in terms of having their own space, they are not all on top of each other. How was this done? Someone designed and edited the notes, or are all the authors using the same book? Is this one book annotated by different people, or many books annotated by the owner of each copy of the book?

Very subjective vision, your reading is being interrupted by others' thoughts. The authorship is shared, collective way of reading and writing: Authorship is participative. Interdependent. You trasmit your knowledge, the reading is shared

Cover looks like Reclam publisher, but different. Just like the Feminism/Postmodernism cover of the copy, it doesn't try to reproduce perfectly, or faking it.

Workshop with Dusan Barok

Tuesday 4 June

XPUB1 Special Issue 9: 10:00 - 17:00 / with Dusan + Femke in the small project space
Workshop with Dusan Barok

10:00 Discuss launch, plans, TODO-lists (Femke)
11:00 Dusan Barok on Monoskop
13:00 Lunch
14:00 Dusan on annotation; return to plans together

Digital (hidden) Labour in digital libraries

File:WORKSHOP INTERFACING THE LAW.PNG
Anonymity and acknowledgment on (hidden) (digital) labor in shadow library

Authorship - economy
Subjective of categorization as a form of annotation
Labour - collectivity?
How metadata is edited in this libraries and how is the work that is behind that
Harvesting of full metadata sets from libgen for example

- Relation between authorship and work.
- Anonymity vs acknowledgment.

Story?

Thinking about authorship in the context of hidden labour in shadow libraries, I question what does it mean to possess authorship when an act of pirating is happened, how can authorship be made, what are hidden accumulated labours that we don't see physically. These labours are made by sharing, editing, scanning, modifying, downloading files, however, these materials are usually not being considered as part of 'content' as annotation, it is considered to be ignored or intentionally hidden. What, Why, and how are they hidden, how can we divulge? Do we want to acknowledge on our labour or leave it anonymously?

Method? (How to?)

— Stretching the Idea of Shadow(ing): The meaning of shadow is an area of darkness, being blocked by something, and being unofficial. And the meaning of Shadowing is a method for observing the ultrastructure of biological specimens by increasing visibility of electron microscope in order to see cells minutely. If I think of 'Shadowing' in the context of hidden labour in shadow libraries, an act of shadowing is that zooming-in the invisible layer of the library to witness traces of what is being hidden.

Workshop?

Knowledge labour in the pirate library/ Being a knowledge labourer means to download, to edit, to modify, and to upload files — finding out what labours were spent when pirating.

How?

Diving into a forensic way of investigation on labour: In order to reveal the hidden labour in shadow library, Participant will be a detective to find digital labour footages. Being in a detective mode, we'll track down traces/labours that are made throughout the process of select, copy, scan, upload, download, modify, edit, categorize files and put metadata etc...

New knowledge?

Being as a knowledge labourer, you are aware of thinking on the concept of acknowledgment on hidden labours in shadow library.

A role of annotation?

Annotation becomes a tool to acknowledge hidden labour produced in shadow libraries. It will be considered as more like a investigation(workshop) report on revealing the hidden labour.

Aim?

To experience the behind scene of what's going on in pirate libraries To be aware of legality, anonymity, and acknowledgment. To find out what possible digital labours were being hidden, and why is it important to think of? To understand anonymity in pirating and acknowledging its authorship.

Tool?

Exiftool

Blurry Boundaries Workshop

Introduction

Welcome to our {frictions, gain or loss} workshop. When one medium {physical book} is transferred to another {digital book}, situations that happen in the process are unintentionally invisible. Through the workshop, we will experience what are the steps necessary to build a phygital {physical-digital} library and reveal meticulously on what is the hidden labour and work process behind it. With this activity, we aim to reflect upon the physicality of a book when it is converted into a digital file, and vice versa. During the workshop we will question together on how we keep what is lost during these steps and how we could increase the life of the source.

Select, annotate, analyze, scan, correct, digitize, print, read, transfer, erase, encode, curate, hack, interface, work, copy...

What libraries become possible when you transform physical books into digital files, and vice versa? When a digital copy of a book is made for a digital library specific steps are followed. Each of these steps requires a decision – to use tools and to spend time. The work involved in digitising a book is invisible and the digital version often loses its connection to the physical book and the library it came from.

We aimed to reflect upon different topics such as:

  the friction between the physical and digital book, what is lost and what is gained when you pass from one format to another.
  the physicality and contingency of these passages, the labor involved to produce those copies and its hidden position.
  the mindset of the librarian who has to choose how to produce the digital library, which format to chose and what kind of information to reveal.
  the possibility of a digital library which provides the history of the book and the people involved in its life.
  annotations which reveal information and challenge the common, static idea of the book.

Final Labour Form

Labour form sketches

Explanation

In the papers that we are giving you, there is the hidden labour's form that you have to compile while following each step. It is important to write down the starting time of each process to notice how much time do you needed for each step. In the end we are going to scan and append it to the digital book (to produce a file with those, oherwise hidden, information of the labour involved to prduce it). The final file will contain the readable pdf, the text produced by trying to convert the scanned image into text and a copy of the hidden labour's form.

Each of you will have a computer with the main tools we are going to use on the purple sheet there is an explaination of each step to follow to help you during the process of compiling the form.

1. For first we are going to ask you to choose a book from Leeszaal, just make sure it fits the scanner.
2. The second step consist in the condition report where we are going to analyze the physical condition of the book.

There is a scale to check the weight of the book and meant to be compared with the size of the final digital file.
A chart provided by ebay when you want to sell a book. There you can check the physical condition of the book.
And on the purple sheet, there is a list of traces as marginalia, underlines and other particular marks that you could find on your book.

3. At the third step, starts the digitalization of the book, here you can chose one or more pages to scan that will become a .jpg image to be renamed and saved in the workshop_folder on the desktop.

To run the scanner you can run the 'scan.sh' icon in the folder.
4. Then you can open the image with Pinta (a linux version of paint) or Gimp and correct the image. For example turn it in its original direction, crop it or delete unwanted marks. Then you can save it again in the folder.
5. Now it starts the most complicate step, the translation of the image into text. This process can be done manually but actually there are softwares called OCR which optically recognize the characters in the image.
By running the file called 'ocr.sh' in the folder, the software will automatically start and convert your .jpg into a readable pdf. You can open the pdf with the browser to see how it looks like.
6. Unfortunately the ocr process is not perfect and usually needs a further step to correct it. To see what is the actual text of the ocr ouput, you can open your pdf file with LibreOffice writer, delete the image and reveal the text hidden behind it.
Then you can compare it with the original pdf and save this text in a new pdf inside your folder.
7. At this point we will use the concept of metadata, set of data that describes and gives information about other data. In fact the form will act exactly as a dataset containing your hidden labour.
To make it visible we will ask you to scan it and save it as a pdf into your folder.
8. After that you can run the 'merge_files.sh' in your folder, it will produce your final pdf that you have to rename. It will contain:

the pdf produced by the ocr
the pdf with the text of the ocr output
the pdf of the hidden labour's form

9. The last step will be to print your work and to upload it in our server which you will find on the bookmarks of the browser. This small digital library that we are going to create is meant to share our works and document the workshop. It will be online in the special issue website

Post workshop - Interviewing with Dusan

Who is Dusan Barok

INTRODUCTION

Dušan Barok is a researcher, artist and cultural activist, involved in critical practice in the fields of software, art, and theory. Graduated in information technologies from the University of Economics of Bratislava, he then passed to the Networked Media masters course from the Piet Zwart Institute in Rotterdam, to finally land in a doctorate in conservation of contemporary art in Amsterdam. He is best known for a Monoskop, a platform for avant-garde media studies, and its practice range from net art,

Monoskop is a wiki for collaborative studies of the arts, media and humanities, started in 2004 as a project to document and map media art and culture in the eastern part of Europe. In one year it expanded toward arts and humanities to take its final form of media library in 2012 as Dusan Barok's graduation project in the Networked Media master course of Piet Zwart Institute. The wiki provides an indexed collection of information, materials and links around those fields, focusing on less-known phenomena. While the parallel project called Monoskop Log, release digital books and papers to create an exhaustive archive of resources directly linked to the wiki entry. Books are available in different formats and their digitization is done by Monoskop but also users can contribute or you can find the link to the original file usually from other digital libraries.

WHY/HOW

--- Dusan Barok works with art, theory and software. He is founding member of Monoskop, an initiative for the collaborative study of art, media, and the humanities; a graduate of the Piet Zwart Institute in Rotterdam, and a member of La Société Anonyme. He currently works as a resercher at the University of Amsterdam. --- Dušan Barok is an artist, writer, and cultural activist involved in critical practice in the fields of software, art, and theory. After founding and organizing the online culture portal Koridor in Slovakia from 1999–2002, in 2003 he co-founded the BURUNDI media lab where he organized the Translab evening series. A year later, the first ideas about building an online platform for texts and media started to emerge and Monoskop became a reality. More than a decade later, Barok is well-known as the main editor of Monoskop. In 2016, he began a PhD research project at the University of Amsterdam. His project, titled Database for the Documentation of Contemporary Art, investigates art databases as discursive platforms that provide context for artworks. In an extended email exchange, we discuss the possibilities and restraints of an online ‘archive’. ---

Letter to Dusan Barok

Hi Dušan,

Thank you for your reply. We're glad that you would like to take part in our interview. Sorry that we're in a hurry but we will start the production of the publication from the 8th of this month. We were wondering what would be best for you to further talk with us. We'd like to meet you in person to have a conversation, however, we understand that it's not the most convenient period for that. So, we would like to suggest that we could either do an online video call session, or we could receive answers by email. Our questions are between the lines below, along with a small introduction about you and Monoskop that we'd like to include in our publication. If you'd like to make any changes or comments on this bio and/or our questions, please feel free to do so.

————————————————

Dušan Barok is a researcher, artist and cultural activist, involved in critical practice in the fields of software, art, and theory. Graduated in information technologies from the University of Economics of Bratislava, he then moved to the Netherlands to complete Networked Media masters course at the Piet Zwart Institute in Rotterdam, to finally land in a doctorate in conservation of contemporary art in Amsterdam. He is best known for Monoskop (monoskop.org), a wiki for collaborative studies of the arts, media and humanities, started in 2004 as a project to document and map media art and culture in the eastern part of Europe. It expanded toward arts and humanities to take its final form of a media library in 2012, as Dušan Barok's graduation project at the Piet Zwart Institute. The wiki provides an indexed collection of information, materials and links around those fields, focusing on less-known phenomena, while the parallel project called "Monoskop Log", releases digital books and papers to create an exhaustive archive of resources directly linked to the wiki entries. Books are available in different formats and their digitization is done by Monoskop but also users can contribute or you can find the link to the original file usually coming from other digital libraries.

1. As the librarian of Monoskop, do you feel the responsibility to regularly share new files and improve how they are organized?

2. Digitizing books involves decisions in how to manage human and non-human traces present in the physical book. When you select a book, do you follow any rules to manage those traces? Do you also leave your personal inprints?

3. In the Monoskop catalog we have found books such as "Umenie dnes" by Tomáš Štrauss (for example, page 3, 158, and 172) where the digital copy contains marks from the physical source. When did this preoccupation start and what does it means for you to explore the processes in the margins of readable sources?

4. Libraries, as the Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden where you were involved, are starting to implement digital archives for their collections. However, the historical memory of the physical book with its time frame within a specific library and its spatial position in it are not represented, showing a loss of criticism in the relation between books, institutions and people involved in its fruition. Do you think is it important to keep this historical information in the digital implementation of a library?

5. As for the physical library, the digital archive produces a series of data that can reveal hidden processes behind its circulation, transformation and disappearence in the web. Some of the books in Monoskop Log are linked to the digital library of origin; what is your intention in providing this kind of historical path of the file? Do you keep track of the viability of these links?

6. In 2003 you gave an interview in Neural Magazine where you say that the take down notices are often a reality for Monoskop. Do you keep records of which books you were asked to remove, and by whom you were asked to do it? Do you think this kind of practice could reveal valuable information on how free access to texts is tracked by publishers and how to escape systematic control?

7. Monoskop explores the condition of digital books but it is a project strictly related to the evolution of art in its most contemporary and digital forms. In terms of your doctoral studies in the conservation of contemporary art, what is the relation between the digital artwork and the digital book? Should their processes of conservation and reproduction be addressed in the same way?

——————————————————

Thank you very much for your participation, and we're looking forward to hearing from you soon.

Best, Pedro, Tancredi and Bo

User:Bohye Woo/Special Issue 9

Contents