Special Issue: Research Notes: Difference between revisions
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
Redundant technologies, hierarchical societies, exploitation and domination are the key words of our era: there’s a common feeling of oppression and scarce that comes from our abundance of resources and technologies. | Redundant technologies, hierarchical societies, exploitation and domination are the key words of our era: there’s a common feeling of oppression and scarce that comes from our abundance of resources and technologies. | ||
What if we would start to reconsider all of these necessities that we apparently have? | ''What if we would start to reconsider all of these necessities that we apparently have?'' | ||
The enormous possibilities of our time could maybe begin to mature and start to being distribute in different ways? | ''The enormous possibilities of our time could maybe begin to mature and start to being distribute in different ways?'' | ||
Could be possible to turn this “western obsession” of being privileged into a tool to produce liberation and new potentialities? | ''Could be possible to turn this “western obsession” of being privileged into a tool to produce liberation and new potentialities?'' | ||
''What if the economic growth of our society should leave its confident facade and however start to be seen in its transparency of being an impossible and fake system of development? | |||
'' | |||
The unsustainability of our system has become common knowledge. It creates a sense of another history characterized by a subtle intuition of “what is that could be otherwise” if abundance will be managed in other ways. | The unsustainability of our system has become common knowledge. It creates a sense of another history characterized by a subtle intuition of “what is that could be otherwise” if abundance will be managed in other ways. | ||
The problem of capitalism is that those two consciousness, realizing which are the problems and imagining new solutions, are living in constant tension. | The problem of capitalism is that those two consciousness, realizing which are the problems and imagining new solutions, are living in constant tension. | ||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
Scarcity is disconnection, separation, financial speculation, poverty of intellect and sociality, cultural reductionism, uniformity, mass production and totalitarian politics. | Scarcity is disconnection, separation, financial speculation, poverty of intellect and sociality, cultural reductionism, uniformity, mass production and totalitarian politics. | ||
What if we start to reconnect our cognitive potencies in new bodies of collective imagination, what if the unimaginable becomes imaginable? | ''What if we start to reconnect our cognitive potencies in new bodies of collective imagination, what if the unimaginable becomes imaginable?'' | ||
In order to make a little step in this sense, we write this publication: | In order to make a little step in this sense, we write this publication: | ||
Revision as of 11:40, 5 October 2016
METHODS | Structure of the publication
*1st PART: RESEARCH [27 Sep - 16 Oct ]
During this period of time, all the XPub students are researching and finding topics to explore and study in the publication.
*2nd PART: PRACTICING - EXPERIMENTING - CREATING CONTENTS [17 Oct- 24 Oct]
From those topics, the creation of the contents starts. The idea is to gather a wide range of issues and transform them in different kinds of forms. From interview 'till essays, journalistic reports or fictions, experiments and performances with a public with their guidelines written in form of manual.
*3nd PART: INTERACTION ! [17 Oct- 24 Oct]
If the topic needs an interaction with a public, in this part an intervention to involve other people in the process will happen.
*4nd PART: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PUBLICATION [24 Oct - 06 Dec]
The last part consist in the physical construction of the publication: the moment where all the contents and the experimentations should be organized in a structured form.
MANIFESTO | Personal Intents
Talking about scarcity means recognize the wideness and the hypothetical paradoxes of the significance of the term. From the french “escarcete”, “scarce” is something restricted in its quantity, insufficient in satisfying a need.
The significance of the term depends on a series of factors like
- the geographical context
- the economic system
- the politic.
It goes without saying that from these factors some other questions are popping out:
- Can we talk about a global scarcity?
- Which is the economical system who causes scarcity ?
- Who are the people that are suffering from a situation of scarcity?
- Which are the existents regulations that are trying to solve the problem?
Modernity turned into a “hypermodernity” where the idea of an infinite progress seems to be the major faith.
This infinite escalation to an ideal form of technological, social and economical progress is strictly linked to an idea of catastrophe: our current idea of progress has “derailed or is on the wrong track”, in sense that the capability of our aspiration to an infinite acceleration is not sustainable, and it never was. Our system of patriarchalism, privatization, class domination and capitalism produced the scarcity that we’re going to meet and we are currently exploring.
Redundant technologies, hierarchical societies, exploitation and domination are the key words of our era: there’s a common feeling of oppression and scarce that comes from our abundance of resources and technologies.
What if we would start to reconsider all of these necessities that we apparently have?
The enormous possibilities of our time could maybe begin to mature and start to being distribute in different ways?
Could be possible to turn this “western obsession” of being privileged into a tool to produce liberation and new potentialities?
What if the economic growth of our society should leave its confident facade and however start to be seen in its transparency of being an impossible and fake system of development? The unsustainability of our system has become common knowledge. It creates a sense of another history characterized by a subtle intuition of “what is that could be otherwise” if abundance will be managed in other ways. The problem of capitalism is that those two consciousness, realizing which are the problems and imagining new solutions, are living in constant tension. They cannot really fit together. The actuality of our domination system cannot definitely match with the potentiality of living in freedom.
There’s a necessity of reviewing of all our parameters in order to find new forms of dialogue and collectivity. Scarcity is disconnection, separation, financial speculation, poverty of intellect and sociality, cultural reductionism, uniformity, mass production and totalitarian politics.
What if we start to reconnect our cognitive potencies in new bodies of collective imagination, what if the unimaginable becomes imaginable?
In order to make a little step in this sense, we write this publication: a collective embodied encyclopedia of methods, analysis and speculations around possible new forms to discuss and talk about scarcity.