User:Fabian Landewee/Flusser: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* ''Before the Alphabet there was a prehistorical way of thinking, traditional images were used as maps for the world. The structure of images involved a specific way of looking at the world which is the mythical way. | * ''Before the Alphabet there was a prehistorical way of thinking, traditional images were used as maps for the world. The structure of images involved a specific way of looking at the world which is the mythical way. | ||
* ''But when 3500 years ago the alphabet was introduced in the Western world, there was a total transformation of our experience and our actions. We went from a mythical way of looking at the world to a historical causal and critical way of thinking about the world.'' | * ''But when 3500 years ago the alphabet was introduced in the Western world, there was a total transformation of our experience and our actions. We went from a mythical way of looking at the world to a historical causal and critical way of thinking about the world.'' | ||
Revision as of 14:37, 3 October 2016
Flusser on writing, complexity, and the technical revolutions
Flusser argues that the most important dimensions of the present cultural revolution is not sufficiently accentuated. Namely the fact that, linguistic communication, both the spoken and written word, are no longer capable of transmitting the thoughts and concepts which we have concerning the world.
It is his firm believe that if you want, nowadays, to have a clear distinct communication of your concepts, you have to use synthetic images, no longer words.
In his terminology he says that before the invention of writing, people thought in a pre-historical way, after the invention of the alphabet, historical consciousness was elaborated. And now we are in the process of elaborating a post-historical structural way of thinking.
- Before the Alphabet there was a prehistorical way of thinking, traditional images were used as maps for the world. The structure of images involved a specific way of looking at the world which is the mythical way.
- But when 3500 years ago the alphabet was introduced in the Western world, there was a total transformation of our experience and our actions. We went from a mythical way of looking at the world to a historical causal and critical way of thinking about the world.
- Now that discourse has been substituted by calculus, historical progressive thinking is being abondoned in favor of a new type of thinking. The post-historical structural way of thinking is more capable of transmitting the thoughts and concepts of the world we live in now.''
Flusser makes a distinction between a structural and functional complexity
- - Structurally complex: for instance, there can be systems where elements maintain a very complex relation with eachother. A structually complex system may be functionally simple, like television, which has a structure of complexity, but the use of it is simple.
- - Funtionally complex: simple system, but can be used in a complex way. For example a chess game.
Functionally complex systems are a challenge to creative thought. Whereas functionally simple systems are stupifying, idiotic.
Now the complex systems which now are coming about, are complex in structural sense, whether they will be functionally complex or not, depends on us. Flusser finds it necessary to have a new attituted towards the image: They no longer represent the world. The new images are now articulations of thought.
Flusser finds it necessary to have a new attituted towards the image:
They no longer represent the world. The new images are now articulations of thought.