User:Emily/20160529: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
➡️Areas of research: SCOs in comtemporary art:<br> | ➡️Areas of research: SCOs in comtemporary art:<br> | ||
Duchamp's '''readymades''', and the '''informatioanl circuit'''<br> | Duchamp's '''readymades''', and the '''informatioanl circuit'''<br> | ||
'''The changing face of readymades''': in Guy Ben-Ner's work, ''I'd Give It to You If I Could But I Borrowed It''<br> | '''The changing face of readymades''': in Guy Ben-Ner's work, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvKUn0MKgeU ''I'd Give It to You If I Could But I Borrowed It'']<br> | ||
'''Sharable readymades''', a work of Rob Myer, who "[http://robmyers.org/shareable-readymades/|return iconic art historical objects to the cultural commons]"(Pipe, Ballon dog and Urianl).<br> | '''Sharable readymades''', a work of Rob Myer, who "[http://robmyers.org/shareable-readymades/|return iconic art historical objects to the cultural commons]"(Pipe, Ballon dog and Urianl).<br> | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
'''The readymade comprise not found obejcts, but instead "found structures beyong visible reality and its seeming concreteness."''' -- art historian Benjamin Buchloh<br> | '''The readymade comprise not found obejcts, but instead "found structures beyong visible reality and its seeming concreteness."''' -- art historian Benjamin Buchloh<br> | ||
Like the readymades once towed the boarder-line of the art in the institutional museum-garllery, the sharable 3d printed files follows the same manner question what can be shared as digital commons.<br> | Like the readymades once towed the boarder-line of the art in the institutional museum-garllery, the sharable 3d printed files follows the same manner question what can be shared as digital commons.<br> | ||
====<span style='font-size:12px;text-transform:uppercase;font-family:Verdana;background:#141212;color:#33FF99;padding:5px;'>Symbolic network</span>==== | ====<span style='font-size:12px;text-transform:uppercase;font-family:Verdana;background:#141212;color:#33FF99;padding:5px;'>Symbolic network</span>==== |
Revision as of 08:20, 30 May 2016
overview of the research project
The central figure of the research project is Symbolically charged obejects.
Be it in cinema, contemporary art, or ditial commons culture (specifially among these shared 3D files in the network culture), SCOs are distallations of certain structures, no matter if it's cinematic narration, institutional categorization or social condition at large.
The research and practice draw the attention to the affinity relationship between the chosen objects with readymades.
The above will be explained in two parts that are mixed up, one is my own practices and the other is influences of the particular way of looking at objects that informs what I do.
sybolically charged obejects in circulation
➡️Areas of research: Cinematic Objects (Objects as protagonists):
Hitchcockian objects: The key in Notorious and Dial M for Murder, the wedding ring in Shadwo of a Doubt and Rear Window, the lighter in Strangers on a Train
Typical MacGuffin/cienmatic pretext: Opening scene from Milano Calibro 9 (1972)
Object of exchange: compare the key in Dial M for Murder with the letter in The Purloined Letter.
➡️Areas of research: SCOs in comtemporary art:
Duchamp's readymades, and the informatioanl circuit
The changing face of readymades: in Guy Ben-Ner's work, I'd Give It to You If I Could But I Borrowed It
Sharable readymades, a work of Rob Myer, who "iconic art historical objects to the cultural commons"(Pipe, Ballon dog and Urianl).
➡️Areas of research: SCOs in ditial commons culture:
Thingiverse as a case study: the leading website for 3d printing designs in its repository are free to upload and download.
A group of objects are selected from Thingiverse, the most popular website for sharing creative commons of 3D files. They exist in a grey zone, a disputed border which questions what objects can be shared and produced.
It goes to show the power of certian forms even when they are separated from their function.
The readymade comprise not found obejcts, but instead "found structures beyong visible reality and its seeming concreteness." -- art historian Benjamin Buchloh
Like the readymades once towed the boarder-line of the art in the institutional museum-garllery, the sharable 3d printed files follows the same manner question what can be shared as digital commons.
Symbolic network
Symbolic efficiency:
public-supposed-to-believe: "it can travel without being stopped and questioned"; "it can coexist nicely with deception or distrust" as long as "people are willing to let it pass".
symbolic institution must also register this "fact".
"There are no commons without community: commons are always maintained and managed by a community."
Graduation project
For the Common Good
The culture of 3D shapes online (part of the ‘digital commons’) embraces a vast variety of methods of distribution. Within the context of the boom in 3D printing, virtual models easily become physical. The relation between the digital and physical features enhances the current hype about this medium. In For the Common Good, a group of objects are selected from Thingiverse, the most popular website for sharing creative commons of 3D files. They exist in a grey zone, a disputed border which questions what objects can be shared and produced. However, many shapes share the same coordinates, which provide the foundation for further shapes to be built. By viewing the physically printed objects, people are invited to discuss what they understand the objects to be. A video features the artist as an anonymous performer with a selection of ambiguous objects. The work requires people to reconsider the cognitive relationship with objects.
Learning from other works
- the well-organised absense of information that draws us in
- storytelling without a dialogue, the purest form of cinematic storytelling
- the domain of the production of artists